KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Aviation / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Air Cargo Carrier Selection: The Case of Turkey

Serdar ALNIPAK
Yusuf Can TUNABOYLU
Sefa CEYHAN
Sayfa
242–250
Yayın Tarihi
2023-07-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Another important result of this research is that Turkish Cargo is ranked first and MNG Airlines and Transportation is ranked second.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, 5 companies operating in Turkey and carrying out the most air cargo shipments in 2021 (Turkish Cargo, MNG Airlines and Transportation, ACT Air Cargo, ULS Airlines Cargo Transportation and Sunexpress Cargo Transportation.) were investigated The aim is to evaluate and analyze them according to different criteria.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:These are 12 different criteria: Breadth of the network, the productivity of employees, adequacy of equipments, flexibility, undamaged delivery, image, cost, customer information systems, handling customer requests and complaints, special cargo handling capabilities, flight frequency, and punctuality.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Another important result of this research is that Turkish Cargo is ranked first and MNG Airlines and Transportation is ranked second.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Aviation · Aviation Management · Air Cargo

Abstract

In this study, 5 companies operating in Turkey and carrying out the most air cargo shipments in 2021 (Turkish Cargo, MNG Airlines and Transportation, ACT Air Cargo, ULS Airlines Cargo Transportation and Sunexpress Cargo Transportation.) were investigated The aim is to evaluate and analyze them according to different criteria. These are 12 different criteria: Breadth of the network, the productivity of employees, adequacy of equipments, flexibility, undamaged delivery, image, cost, customer information systems, handling customer requests and complaints, special cargo handling capabilities, flight frequency, and punctuality. In the research design, using the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, the opinions of 9 different experienced and active experts in the sector were used to evaluate the relevant criteria. A scale of 1 to 5 was used in the evaluation of the companies, with a value of 5 representing the maximum benefit for this criterion. As a result of the research, it was found that the most significant criteria in selecting air cargo companies are undamaged delivery, costs, and on-time delivery. In addition, (1) image, (2) flexibility, and (3) special cargo handling capabilities are among the results of the research, which are the least significant criteria. Another important result of this research is that Turkish Cargo is ranked first and MNG Airlines and Transportation is ranked second.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALNIPAK, S., TUNABOYLU, Y. C., CEYHAN, S. (2023). Air Cargo Carrier Selection: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Aviation, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 242–250. https://ajindex.com/articles/953344

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Akoğlu, B. & Fidan, Y. (2020). Dünyada Hava Kargo Taşımacılığı ve Türkiye'nin Yeri. Ekonomi İşletme ve Yönetim Dergisi, 4(1), 30-51.
  2. Alshurideh, M., Alsharari, N. M. & Al Kurdi, B. (2019). Supply Chain Integration and Customer Relationship Management in the Airline Logistics. Theoretical Economics Letters, 9(02), 392. Ayçin, E. (2019). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme: Bilgisayar Uygulamalı Çözümler. Ankara:
  3. Nobel Yayınevi.
  4. Aytekin, A. (2022). Çok Kriterli Karar Analizi. Ankara:
  5. Nobel Yayınevi.
  6. Bailey, D., Goonetilleke, A. & Campbell, D. (2003). A New Fuzzy Multicriteria Evaluation Method for Group Site Selection in GIS. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(6), 337-347.
  7. Ballis, A. (2003). Airport Site Selection Based on Multicriteria Analysis: The Case Study of The Island of Samothraki. Operational Research, 3, 261-279.
  8. Bircan, H. (2020). ÇKKV Problemlerinde Kriter Ağırlıklandırma Yöntemleri. Ankara:
  9. Nobel Yayınevi.
  10. Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2006). A Fuzzy Topsis Methodology to Support Outsourcing of Logistics Services. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 294-308.
  11. Brooks, R., M. (1990). Ocean Carrier Selection Criteria in a New Environment. Logistics and Transportation Review, 26(4), 339-355.
  12. Chen, C. J., Huang, J. W. & Hsiao, Y. C. (2010). Knowledge Management and Innovativeness: The Role of Organizational Climate and Structure. International journal of Manpower. Degraeve, Z., Labro, E. & Roodhooft, F. (2004). Total Cost of Ownership Purchasing of a Service: The Case of Airline Selection at Alcatel Bell. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(1), 23-40.
  13. Dehdasht, G., Mohamad Zin, R., Ferwati, M.S., Mohammed Abdullahi, M., Keyvanfar, A. & McCaffer, R. (2017). “Dematel-Anp Risk Assessment in Oil and Gas Construction Projects”, Sustainability, 9(8), 1420. Demir, G., Özyalçın, A.T. ve Bircan, H. (2021). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ve ÇKKV Yazılımı ile Problem Çözüm. Ankara:
  14. Nobel Yayınevi.
  15. Demirbilek, A., Sabri, Ö. Z. & Fidan, Y. (2018). Lojistik Performans Endeksi ve Havayolu Kargo Taşimaciliği Ilişkisi: 2007-2016 Türkiye Örneği. Ekonomi İşletme ve Yönetim Dergisi, 2(1), 1-24. DHMİ. (2023, January 24) https://www.dhmi.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Istatistikler.aspx
  16. Doğan, A. (2013). “Hava Kargo Taşımacılığının Türkiye Ekonomisindeki Yeri” Ankara Üniversitesi,
  17. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İktisat Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, 2013. Dožić, S., Lutovac, T. & Kalić, M. (2018). Fuzzy AHP Approach to Passenger Aircraft Type Selection. Journ