KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

The Validity and Reliability of General Measurement and Evaluation Efficiency Scale for Physical Education Teachers

Cevdet CENGİZ
Nurdan GÜMÜŞBAŞ YAYKIN
Sayfa
29–45
Yayın Tarihi
2021-08-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, the MECCP Scale was found to be valid and reliable for Turkish in-service PE teachers and is therefore highly recommended to evaluate in-service PE teacher's perceptions of the measurement and evaluation of common competency and also to establish new experimental designs to support the development of general efficiency levels of measurement and evaluation by PE teachers.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Measurement and evaluation are critical elements in curriculum programs and for physical education (PE) teachers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Therefore, the purpose of this study is to establish the validity and reliability of the Measurement and Evaluation of Common Competency Perception (MECCP) Scale for in-service PE teachers (n=878).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, the MECCP Scale was found to be valid and reliable for Turkish in-service PE teachers and is therefore highly recommended to evaluate in-service PE teacher's perceptions of the measurement and evaluation of common competency and also to establish new experimental designs to support the development of general efficiency levels of measurement and evaluation by PE teachers.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Physical Education · In-Service Teachers · Measurement

Abstract

Measurement and evaluation are critical elements in curriculum programs and for physical education (PE) teachers. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to establish the validity and reliability of the Measurement and Evaluation of Common Competency Perception (MECCP) Scale for in-service PE teachers (n=878). For construct validity, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) (n=440) were conducted with two different samples. According to the EFA results (n=438), the three-factor MECCP Scale contained 23 items. After CFA (n=440), the three-factor structure was 23 items using Schumacker and Lomax LISREL analyses. Findings indicated good fit indices with χ2/sd=4.83, RMSEA=0.09, CFI=0.96, IFI=0.96, and NFI=0.95. In addition, Cronbach alpha scores were calculated as 0.50-0.77. In conclusion, the MECCP Scale was found to be valid and reliable for Turkish in-service PE teachers and is therefore highly recommended to evaluate in-service PE teacher's perceptions of the measurement and evaluation of common competency and also to establish new experimental designs to support the development of general efficiency levels of measurement and evaluation by PE teachers.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CENGİZ, C., YAYKIN, N. G. (2021). The Validity and Reliability of General Measurement and Evaluation Efficiency Scale for Physical Education Teachers. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 29–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/931702

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Arslan, Y., Erturan-İlker, G., & Demirhan, G. (2013). Geliştirilen bir ölçme ve değerlendirme gelişim programının beden eğitimi öğretmen adaylarının ölçme ve değerlendirmeye ilişkin algılarına etkisi. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 1107-1124.
  2. Avşar, Z. (2012). Creating initial physical education teacher education standards for Turkey. (Unpublished master's thesis). Eskisehir, Turkey: Department of Educational Sciences Curriculum and Instruction Program, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Anadolu University. Retrieved from http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/
  3. Azzarito, L., & Ennis, C.D. (2003). A sense of connection: Toward social constructivist physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 8, 179-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573320309255
  4. Baş, G., & Beyhan, Ö. (2016). Öğretmenlerin eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirmeye yönelik özyeterlik algılarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 7(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.34199
  5. Bell, S.S. (2001). Beginner's guide to uncertainty of measurement, Issue: 2, United Kingdom: National Physical Laboratory. Bıçak, B., & Çakan, M. (2004). Views of the high school teachers about assessment and evaluation practices in classroom. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Middle School Restructuring Symposium Proceedings, Ankara.
  6. Boyd, W. (1966). The History of Western Education, 8th ed., revised by E. J. King (London: Adam & Charles). Brennan, J., & Teichler, U. (2008). The future of higher education and of higher education research. Higher Education, 56, 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9124-6.
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Factor analysis: basic concepts and using to development scale. Ankara University, School of Education, Department of Educational Sciences, Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 8(32), 470-483.
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, O.E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2012). Scientific Research Methods. Ankara:
  9. Pegem Akademi. Byrne, B.M. (2001). Multivariate applications book series. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ, U.S.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  10. Çalık, S. (2007). A study on the perceptions of classroom teachers about measurement and evaluation process of new primary school curriculum. In Proceedings of the 16. National Educational Sciences Congress (pp. 252-253).