KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2021 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Accuracy assessment of digital surface models from unmanned aerial vehicles’ imagery on archaeological sites

Emre SENKAL
Gordana KAPLAN
Uğur AVDAN
Sayfa
81–89
Yayın Tarihi
2021-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, while there was 1 m difference between the data without the use of control points, and the use of control points significantly improved the results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:With the developing technologies, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles’s (UAV) is increasing in all areas.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The comparison of the results showed significant difference between the UAV images and images collected by conventional methods.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, while there was 1 m difference between the data without the use of control points, and the use of control points significantly improved the results.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Unmanned Aerial Vehicle · Digital surface model · Accuracy analysis

Abstract

With the developing technologies, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles’s (UAV) is increasing in all areas. Compared with the conventional photogrammetry and remote sensing sensors, UAVs are more convenient to collect data for small areas. In this study, the accuracy of UAV products was investigated in the archeological area of Eskişehir Şarhöyük. In order to produce reference data for the orthophoto and DTM accuracy analysis, a digital map from the test area was produced using in-situ measurements. Also, for the comparison of the point cloud, a small test area was determined and reference point cloud data was collected with terrestrial laser scanner. The comparison of the results showed significant difference between the UAV images and images collected by conventional methods. Thus, while there was 1 m difference between the data without the use of control points, and the use of control points significantly improved the results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SENKAL, E., KAPLAN, G., AVDAN, U. (2021). Accuracy assessment of digital surface models from unmanned aerial vehicles’ imagery on archaeological sites. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 81–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/929664

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Anderson K & Gaston K J (2013). Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(3), 138-146. DOI:10.1890/120150 Chiabrando F, Nex F, Piatti D & Rinaudo F (2011). UAV and RPV systems for photogrammetric surveys in archaelogical areas: two tests in the Piedmont region (Italy). Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(3), 697-710. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.022 Colomina I & Molina P (2014). Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 92, 79-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013 Comert R, Avdan U, Gorum T & Nefeslioglu H A (2019). Mapping of shallow landslides with object-based image analysis from unmanned aerial vehicle data. Engineering Geology 260: 105264. DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105264 Comert R & Kaplan O (2018). "Object based building extraction and building period estimation from unmanned aerial vehicle data. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 4(3). Comert R, Matcı D K & Avdan U (2018). Detection of collapsed building from unmanned aerial vehicle data with object based image classification. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi-B Teorik Bilimler 6, 109-116.
  2. Costa F G, Ueyama J, Braun T, Pessin G, Osório F S & Vargas P A (2012). The use of unmanned aerial vehicles and wireless sensor network in agricultural applications. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 5045-5048. d'Oleire-Oltmanns S, Marzolff I, Peter K D & Ries J B (2012). Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for monitoring soil erosion in Morocco. Remote Sensing 4(11): 3390-3416. DOI:10.3390/rs4113390 DeBell L, Anderson K, Brazier R E, King N & Jones L (2016). Water resource management at catchment scales using lightweight UAVs: Current capabilities and future perspectives. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 4(1): 7-30. DOI:10.1139/juvs-2015-0026 Eisenbeiß H (2009).
  3. UAV photogrammetry. PHD Thesis, ETH Zurich. Eisenbeiss H & Zhang L (2006). Comparison of DSMs generated from mini UAV imagery and terrestrial laser scanner in a cultural heritage application. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36(5): 90-96.
  4. Fugazza D, Senese A, Azzoni R S, Smiraglia C, Cernuschi M, Severi D & Diolaiuti G A (2015). High-resolution mapping of glacier surface features. The UAV survey of the Forni Glacier (Stelvio National Park, Italy).