KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2026 / Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Accuracy assessment of digital surface models from unmanned aerial vehicles’ imagery on archaeological sites

Emre Senkal(Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi)0000-0003-3366-3786
Gordana Kaplan(ESKİŞEHİR TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, YER VE UZAY BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0001-7522-9924
Uğur Avdan(Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi)0000-0001-7873-9874
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2021-07-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, while there was 1 m difference between the data without the use of control points, and the use of control points significantly improved the results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:With the developing technologies, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles’s (UAV) is increasing in all areas.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The comparison of the results showed significant difference between the UAV images and images collected by conventional methods.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, while there was 1 m difference between the data without the use of control points, and the use of control points significantly improved the results.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Unmanned Aerial Vehicle · Digital surface model · Accuracy analysis

Abstract

With the developing technologies, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles’s (UAV) is increasing in all areas. Compared with the conventional photogrammetry and remote sensing sensors, UAVs are more convenient to collect data for small areas. In this study, the accuracy of UAV products was investigated in the archeological area of Eskişehir Şarhöyük. In order to produce reference data for the orthophoto and DTM accuracy analysis, a digital map from the test area was produced using in-situ measurements. Also, for the comparison of the point cloud, a small test area was determined and reference point cloud data was collected with terrestrial laser scanner. The comparison of the results showed significant difference between the UAV images and images collected by conventional methods. Thus, while there was 1 m difference between the data without the use of control points, and the use of control points significantly improved the results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Senkal, E., Kaplan, G., Avdan, U. (2021). Accuracy assessment of digital surface models from unmanned aerial vehicles’ imagery on archaeological sites. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Volume: 6 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.696001

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (25)

  1. Anderson K & Gaston K J (2013). Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(3), 138-146. DOI:10.1890/120150
  2. Chiabrando F, Nex F, Piatti D & Rinaudo F (2011). UAV and RPV systems for photogrammetric surveys in archaelogical areas: two tests in the Piedmont region (Italy). Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(3), 697-710. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.022
  3. Colomina I & Molina P (2014). Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 92, 79-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013
  4. Comert R, Avdan U, Gorum T & Nefeslioglu H A (2019). Mapping of shallow landslides with object-based image analysis from unmanned aerial vehicle data. Engineering Geology 260: 105264. DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105264
  5. Comert R & Kaplan O (2018). "Object based building extraction and building period estimation from unmanned aerial vehicle data. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 4(3).
  6. Comert R, Matcı D K & Avdan U (2018). Detection of collapsed building from unmanned aerial vehicle data with object based image classification. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi-B Teorik Bilimler 6, 109-116.
  7. Costa F G, Ueyama J, Braun T, Pessin G, Osório F S & Vargas P A (2012). The use of unmanned aerial vehicles and wireless sensor network in agricultural applications. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 5045-5048.
  8. d'Oleire-Oltmanns S, Marzolff I, Peter K D & Ries J B (2012). Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for monitoring soil erosion in Morocco. Remote Sensing 4(11): 3390-3416. DOI:10.3390/rs4113390
  9. DeBell L, Anderson K, Brazier R E, King N & Jones L (2016). Water resource management at catchment scales using lightweight UAVs: Current capabilities and future perspectives. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 4(1): 7-30. DOI:10.1139/juvs-2015-0026
  10. Eisenbeiß H (2009). UAV photogrammetry. PHD Thesis, ETH Zurich.
  11. Eisenbeiss H & Zhang L (2006). Comparison of DSMs generated from mini UAV imagery and terrestrial laser scanner in a cultural heritage application. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36(5): 90-96.
  12. Fugazza D, Senese A, Azzoni R S, Smiraglia C, Cernuschi M, Severi D & Diolaiuti G A (2015). High-resolution mapping of glacier surface features. The UAV survey of the Forni Glacier (Stelvio National Park, Italy). Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria, 38, 25-33. DOI 10.4461/GFDQ.2015.38.03
  13. Garcia-Fernandez M, Alvarez-Lopez Y, Gonzalez-Valdes B, Rodriguez-Vaqueiro Y, Arboleya-Arboleya A, Heras F L & Pino A (2018). GPR system onboard a UAV for non-invasive detection of buried objects. IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, 1967-1968.
  14. Gindraux S, Boesch R & Farinotti D (2017). Accuracy assessment of digital surface models from unmanned aerial vehicles’ imagery on glaciers. Remote Sensing, 9(2): 186. 10.3390/rs9020186
  15. Hasting L (2019). "Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Technology for Archaeology: A Case Study of Petra, Jordan." Scholars Week, 30.
  16. Holness C, Matthews T, Satchell K & Swindell E C (2016). Remote sensing archeological sites through unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imaging. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 6695-6698. DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7730748
  17. Ilci V, Ozulu I M, Bilgi S & Alkan R M (2019). The usage of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for 3D mapping of archaeological sites. FEB-Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28(2), 968-974.
  18. Karakış S (2012). Searching The Posibilities of Large Scale Photogrammetric Map Production via Model Aircraft. Harita Dergisi, 147, 13-20. (in Turkish)
  19. Lin A Y-M, Novo A, Har-Noy S, Ricklin N D & Stamatiou K (2011). Combining GeoEye-1 satellite remote sensing, UAV aerial imaging, and geophysical surveys in anomaly detection applied to archaeology. IEEE Journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing, 4(4), 870-876.
  20. Pérez J A, Gonçalves G R & Charro M C (2019). On the positional accuracy and maximum allowable scale of UAV-derived photogrammetric products for archaeological site documentation. Geocarto International, 34(6): 575-585. DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1421714
  21. Rusli N, Majid M R, Razali N F A A & Yaacob N F F (2019). Accuracy assessment of DEM from UAV and TanDEM-X imagery. IEEE 15th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications (CSPA), 127-131, Penang, Malaysia.
  22. Sauerbier M & Eisenbeiss H (2010). UAVs for the documentation of archaeological excavations. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(5), 526-531.
  23. Tache A V, Sandu I C A, POPESCU O-C & PETRIŞOR A-I (2018). UAV solutions for the protection and management of cultural heritage. Case study: Halmyris Archaeological site. International Journal of Conservation Science, 9(4), 795-804.
  24. Themistocleous K (2017). The use of UAVs to monitor archeological sites: the case study of Choirokoitia within the PROTHEGO project. Fifth International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2017), International Society for Optics and Photonics. DOI: 10.1117/12.2292351
  25. Tscharf A, Rumpler M, Fraundorfer F, Mayer G & Bischof H (2015). On the use of UAVs in mining and archaeology-geo-accurate 3D reconstructions using various platforms and terrestrial views. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 2, 15-22.