Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Psychological Capital: A Positive Psychological Resource and Its Relationship with Creative Performance Behavior

Sayfa
101–118
Yayın Tarihi
2016-08-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, it was demonstrated that psychological capital components had significant effect on explaining creative performance behavior.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz Creative performance behavior and psychological capital concepts having theoretical roots of positive organizational behavior and positive psychological capital have been examined in a number of studies in literature for investigating high performance and innovative organizations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It is recognized that the employee creative performance behavior has been the investigated with its associations with several concepts including supportive managerial implementation, job characteristics, organizational climate and culture, personality factors.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, it was demonstrated that psychological capital components had significant effect on explaining creative performance behavior.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Psychological Capital · Positive Psychology · Creativity

Özet

Öz Creative performance behavior and psychological capital concepts having theoretical roots of positive organizational behavior and positive psychological capital have been examined in a number of studies in literature for investigating high performance and innovative organizations. It is recognized that the employee creative performance behavior has been the investigated with its associations with several concepts including supportive managerial implementation, job characteristics, organizational climate and culture, personality factors. The present study has focused on the assumption regarding the relationship between psychological capital components of self-efficacy, hope, optimism and resilience with creative performance behavior. Based on the extant resources and conceptual rationale, it is expected that psychological capital variables could have significant explanatory power on employee creative performance behavior. With that respect, a research study was performed in a large size White Good Company in Turkey which has been indicated as an innovative and high performance organization by relevant research results. 165 first line and middle level white and blue collar employees have participated in the questionnaire survey. The data were analyzed through the use of SPSS and LISREL programmes. Each variable of the model was evaluated by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) methods. According to the results, it was revealed that the total psychological capital and each of the psychological capital components had significant positive relationships with employee creative performance behavior. In addition, it was demonstrated that psychological capital components had significant effect on explaining creative performance behavior.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAŞTAN, A. P. D. S. B. (2016). Psychological Capital: A Positive Psychological Resource and Its Relationship with Creative Performance Behavior. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 101–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/9278

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Abbas, M., Raja, U. (2014). Impact of perceived organizational politics on supervisory-rated ınnovative performance and job stress: evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 2(2), 1-34.
  2. Akdoğan A.A., Polatçi S., (2013). Psikolojik sermayenin performans üzerindeki etkisinde iş aile yayılımı ve psikolojik iyi oluşun etkisi. Atatürk University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 17, 273-293,
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (vol. 10, pp. 123-167), Greenwich: JAI Press.
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1996).
  5. Creativity in Context. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
  6. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 18-26.
  7. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity (pp. 77- 87). Harvard Business School Publishing. Amabile, T. M., Barsage, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 350-367.
  8. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Managemen Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
  9. Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5-32.
  10. Ambrose, M. L., Kulik, C. T. (1999). Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 231-292.
  11. Atilla-Bal, E. (2008). Self-efficacy, contextual factors and well-being: The impact of work engagement. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, Social Sciences Institute, Department of Organizational Behavior, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. Averill, J. R. (1999). Individual differences in emotional creativity: Structure and correlates. Journal of personality, 67(2), 331-371.
  12. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Jensen, S. M. (2009). Psychological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management, 48(5), 677-693.
  13. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M. (2010). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(2), 430-452.
  14. Avey, J. B., Patera, J. L., West, B. J. (2006). The implications of positive psychological capital on employee absenteeism. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(2), 42-60.
  15. Avey, J. B.,