Dergiler / International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) / 2023 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

EFFECT OF TWO INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES ON SPELLING PERFORMANCE OF PUPILS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES IN IBADAN, NIGERIA

Sayfa
15–24
Yayın Tarihi
2023-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, teachers should employ the visual imagery and cloze spelling instructional strategies while teaching spelling to pupils with learning disabilities.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Spelling is a crucial skill for academic success however many pupils with learning disabilities lag behind in academic tasks because of poor spelling skills and its accompanying negative effects.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Thus, the objective of the study was to examine the core effects of visual imagery and cloze spelling instructional strategies on pupils with learning disabilities’ performance in spelling.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, teachers should employ the visual imagery and cloze spelling instructional strategies while teaching spelling to pupils with learning disabilities.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Pupils with learning disabilities · visual imagery · cloze spelling strategy

Abstract

Spelling is a crucial skill for academic success however many pupils with learning disabilities lag behind in academic tasks because of poor spelling skills and its accompanying negative effects. Past studies on pupils with learning disabilities focused more on reading than on spelling skills. Thus, the objective of the study was to examine the core effects of visual imagery and cloze spelling instructional strategies on pupils with learning disabilities’ performance in spelling. The pretest-posttest control group quasi-experimental design of 3 x 2 factorial matrix was adopted. Sixty pupils with learning disabilities (Male = 38, Female = 22, Mean age = 9.35) from three government-run primary schools were chosen using purposive sampling. Three instruments used were Pupil Rating Scale (Revised) (r = .76), Right Word Recognition (r = .91) and Pupils’ Note Books on Dictated Words. Data were analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. The results showed that the core effect of treatment on the performance in spelling of pupils who experience disabilities in learning was significant F¬(3,56) = 2.085. p<.05, η2 = .418), but gender had no significant core effect. Therefore, teachers should employ the visual imagery and cloze spelling instructional strategies while teaching spelling to pupils with learning disabilities.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LAZARUS, K. U., AUDU, O. O. (2023). EFFECT OF TWO INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES ON SPELLING PERFORMANCE OF PUPILS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES IN IBADAN, NIGERIA. International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE), Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 15–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/884313

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Adams, A. M., & Simmons, F. R. (2019). Exploring individual and gender differences in early writing performance. Read Writ, 32, 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9859-0
  2. Adoniou, M. (2014). What should teachers know about spelling?. Literacy, 48(3), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12017
  3. Adoniou, M. (2016). Spelling it out. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Barker, O., & Puente, M. (2013). Does spelling still matter? USA Today, 6. Bowers, J. S., & Bowers, P. N. (2017). Beyond phonics: The case for teaching children the logic of the English spelling system. Educational Psychologist, 52(2), 124-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1288571
  5. Dymock, S., & Nicholson, T. (2017). To what extent does children’s spelling improve as a result of learning words with the look, say, cover, write, check, fix strategy compared with phonological spelling strategies? Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 22(2), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2017.1398766
  6. Ehri, L. C. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200020030-00005
  7. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330).
  8. London, England: Erlbaum. Galuschka, K., Grogen, R., Kalmar, J., Haberstroh, S., Schmalz, X., & Schulte-Korne, G. (2020). Effectiveness of spelling interventions for learners with dyslexia: A meta-analysis and systematic review, Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1659794
  9. Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in “GNYS AT WRK”. The Reading Teacher, 36, 192–200.
  10. Gentry, J. R. (2010). No spelling book in your child’s book bag spells trouble ahead!. Psychology Today. Haddad D (2017). Gender differences in learning disabilities. Learning disabilities Basics. USA: HONcode standard for trustworthy health. Hamdi, S. (2016). An analysis of lexical errors in the English compositions of EFL Tunisian learners. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS), 2(4), 643-652.
  11. Jensen, A. R. (1962). Spelling errors and the serial-position effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 105-109. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042141
  12. Lazarus, K. U. (2016). Academic achievement deficits of adolescents with learning disabilities: Implications for re