KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ilahiyat Studies / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Reflection of Qāḍīzādelīs-Khalwatīs Tension on the Islamic Heresiography: Muṣṭafá ibn Ibrāhīm and His Alphabetical Classification of Sects

Mehmet KALAYCI
Muhammet Emin EREN
Sayfa
249–290
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, the Arabic version of the text with the developed text structure is presented as an appendix.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Islamic heresiography has a long history whose roots go back to the second century of Hegira.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This article suggests that the author lived in the 18th century and belonged to the Qāḍīzādelī environment.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, the Arabic version of the text with the developed text structure is presented as an appendix.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Heresiography · Qāḍīzādelīs · Khalwatīs

Abstract

Islamic heresiography has a long history whose roots go back to the second century of Hegira. The development process, which started with individual articles (maqālah), continued with encyclopedic works. As far as we know, the alphabetical classification of firqahs is the first attempt at Islamic heresiography. This classification, which was written by Muṣṭafá ibn Ibrāhīm in the late period of the Ottomans and reached the present day as a single copy, is remarkable in terms of both the author’s environment and the subjects it contains. This article suggests that the author lived in the 18th century and belonged to the Qāḍīzādelī environment. First, the identification of the author is clarified, and then the content of the heresiographical treatise is analyzed. Finally, the Arabic version of the text with the developed text structure is presented as an appendix.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KALAYCI, M., EREN, M. E. (2018). Reflection of Qāḍīzādelīs-Khalwatīs Tension on the Islamic Heresiography: Muṣṭafá ibn Ibrāhīm and His Alphabetical Classification of Sects. Ilahiyat Studies, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 249–290. https://ajindex.com/articles/884271

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Shaybānī. Musnad al-Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal. Edited by Shuʿayb al-Arnāʾūṭ, ʿĀdil Murshid, Muḥammad Naʿīm al-ʿIrqsūsī, Ibrāhīm al-Zaybaq, Muḥammad Riḍwān al-ʿIrqsūsī, and Kāmil al-Kharrāṭ. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 1999. al-Āmidī, Ibrāhīm al-Qaramānī. Muntakhab al-Hayʾah al-saniyyah fī l-hayʾah al-sunniyyah. Ankara:
  2. National Library, MS A 7486, fols. 13v-64v. al-Āqḥiṣārī, Aḥmad al-Rūmī. Risālah fī l-radd ʿalá l-Maqābiriyyah. Istanbul: Süleymaniye Library, Fatih, MS 5398, fols. 71-86. Arıkan, Âdem. Hanefîliğin Bidat Karşıtı Söylemi: Dâmiğatu’l-Mübtedi‘în Örneği. Ankara: Ilahiyat Yayınları, 2016.
  3. Aydıner, Mesut. “Râgıb Paşa.” In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi (DİA), XXXIV, 403-406. al-ʿAynī, Meḥmed Fiqhī. Kashf al-ghawamiḍ fī aḥkām al-Rawāfiḍ. Istanbul: Âtıf Efendi Library, MS 1179, fols. 334-363. al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl al-Juʿfī. al-Jāmiʿ al-ṣaḥīḥ al-musnad min ḥadīth Rasūl Allāh ṣallá llāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam. Edited by Muḥibb al-Dīn al-Khaṭīb and Muḥammad Fuʾād ʿAbd al-Bāqī. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿah al-Salafiyyah wa-Maktabatuhā, 1980. Bursalı Mehmed Tahir. Osmanlı Müellifleri. 3 vols. Edited by A. Fikri Yavuz and İsmail Özen. Istanbul: Meral Yayınları, n.d. Demir, Necati and Mehmet Dursun Erdem. “Türk Kültüründe Destan ve Battal Gazi Destanı.” Turkish Studies/Türkoloji Dergisi 1, no. 1 (2006): 97-139.
  4. Eren, Muhammet Emin. Hadis, Tarih ve Yorum: 73 Fırka Hadisi Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Istanbul: KURAMER, 2017.
  5. Fığlalı, Ethem Ruhi. “İbn Sadru’d-Din eş-Şirvânî ve İtikâdî Mezhepler Hakkındaki Türkçe Risâlesi.” Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 24 (1981): 249-276. Fındıqlīlī ʿIṣmet Efendī. Takmilat al-Shaqāʾiq fī ḥaqq ahl al-ḥaqāʾiq. In Şakaik-i Numaniye ve Zeyilleri, edited by Abdulkadir Özcan, Vth vol. Istanbul: Çağrı Yayınları, 1989. al-Gelībūlī, Muṣṭafá ibn Ibrāhīm. Zubdat al-amthāl li-wuqūʿihā ʿumdat al-aqwāl. Istanbul: Süleymaniye Library, Bağdatlı Vehbi, MS 1751, fols.1v-48r. Gömbeyaz, Kadir. “Bir Fırak Müellifi Olarak Fahreddin er-Râzî.” In İslam Düşüncesinin Dönüşüm Çağında Fahreddin er-Râzî, edited by Ömer Türker and Osman Demir, 347-378. Istanbul: ISAM, 2013.
  6. Gömbeyaz, Kadir. “İslam Literatüründe İtikâdî Fırka Tasnifleri.” PhD diss., Bursa, Uludağ University, 2015.
  7. Halaçoğlu, Yusuf. “Adana (İslamî Devir).” In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi (DİA), I, 349-353. Ibn Mājah, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Yazīd al-Qazwīnī. Sunan al-Ḥāfiẓ Abī ʿAbd Allāh M