KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences / 2022 / Sayı: 63

Neden paylaşmıyoruz? Sosyal ağlar ve gizlilik endişeleri, Türkiye ve Malezya’daki iletişim akademisyenlerinin karşılaştırmalı bir analizi

Why don’t we share? Social networks and privacy concerns, a comparative analysis of academics of communication field in Turkiye and Malaysia

Betül Önay Doğan(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8468-7767
Nihal Kocabay-şener(İSTANBUL TİCARET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4018-082X
Selçuk Kıran(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6088-2701
Hasrina Mustafa(Universiti Sains Malaysia)0000-0002-5256-6343
Sayfa
87–122
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Elde edilen bulgular değerlendirilerek nitel ve nicel veriler arasındaki ilişki tartışılmıştır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Sosyal Ağ Siteleri (SNS’ler), kullanıcıların içerik paylaşmasına izin verir ancak kullanıcılar bazen çeşitli nedenlerle kasıtlı olarak paylaşımlarını sınırlandırabilir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Elde edilen bulgular değerlendirilerek nitel ve nicel veriler arasındaki ilişki tartışılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Söz konusu bulgular, iki ülkenin sosyal medya kaygılarında önemli farklılıklar olduğu vurgusunu ortaya koymaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Sosyal ağ siteleri · otosansür · mahremiyet endişesi

Özet

Sosyal Ağ Siteleri (SNS’ler), kullanıcıların içerik paylaşmasına izin verir ancak kullanıcılar bazen çeşitli nedenlerle kasıtlı olarak paylaşımlarını sınırlandırabilir. Bu araştırma, Türkiye ve Malezya’daki iletişim alanındaki akademisyenlerin sosyal ağlardaki paylaşımları ile ilgili endişelere odaklanmaktadır. Karma yöntem yaklaşımı benimsenerek, nicel verilerin anket yoluyla toplanmasının ardından katılımcılarla derinlemesine görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular değerlendirilerek nitel ve nicel veriler arasındaki ilişki tartışılmıştır. Gizlilik bilinci ve otosansür puanları her iki ülkede de benzerdir. Malezyalı akademisyenlerin mahremiyet kaygısı puanları Türkiye’den yanıt verenlere göre daha yüksektir ve kaygıları takipçilere odaklanmaktadır. Türkiye’den yanıt verenlerin endişeleri, paylaşılan bilgilerin üçüncü şahıslar tarafından nasıl kullanıldığı konusunda daha yüksektir. Akademik kimlik her iki ülkede de sosyal medya paylaşımlarında kısıtlayıcıdır. Ayrıca Malezyalı katılımcılar dini alanda düzenleme yapılmasını önermişlerdir. Söz konusu bulgular, iki ülkenin sosyal medya kaygılarında önemli farklılıklar olduğu vurgusunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Abstract

While Social Network Sites (SNSs) allow users to share content, some users may sometimes deliberately limit what they share for various reasons. The present research focuses the concerns about what academics share on SNSs in the field of communication in Turkey and Malaysia. Adopting a mixed-method approach, the collection of quantitative data through questionnaires was followed by in- depth interviews with the participants. The findings obtained from both data collection tools were evaluated and the relation between the qualitative and quantitative data was discussed. The results showed that privacy awareness and self-censorship scores were similar in both countries. The privacy concern scores of Malaysian academics were higher than the respondents from Turkey, their concerns focusing on the followers. The concerns of respondents from Turkey about the use of shared information by third parties were higher than their Malaysian counterparts. Academic identity was found as a restrictive factor for social media sharing in both countries. In addition, regulation in the religious field was recommended by the respondents of Malaysia. The findings overall emphasized the significant differences between these two contexts.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Doğan, B. Ö., Kocabay-şener, N., Kıran, S., Mustafa, H. (2022). Neden paylaşmıyoruz? Sosyal ağlar ve gizlilik endişeleri, Türkiye ve Malezya’daki iletişim akademisyenlerinin karşılaştırmalı bir analizi. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, Sayı: 63, 87–122. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1176989

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (67)

  1. Abdulahi, A., Samadi, B., & Gharleghi, B. (2014). A study on the negative effects of social networking sites such as Facebook among Asia Pacific University scholars in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(10).
  2. Abokhodair, N., & Hodges, A. (2019). Toward a transnational model of social media privacy: How young Saudi transnationals do privacy on Facebook. New Media & Society, 21(5), 1105 - 1120. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444818821363
  3. Akdeniz, P. C., & Dursun, Y. (2021). Çevrimiçi kimlik hırsızlığı korkusunun çevrimiçi gizlilik endişesi ve satın alma davranışına etkisi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (60), 609-632.
  4. Aktas, V., Nilsson, M., & Borell, K. (2019). Social scientists under threat: Resistance and self-censorship in Turkish academia. British Journal of Educational Studies, 67(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2018.1502872 Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday. https://doi. org/10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142
  5. Andrejevic, M. (2004). The Work of Watching One Another: Lateral Surveillance, Risk, and Governance. Surveillance & Society, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i4.3359
  6. Avcılar, M. Y., Güreş, N., Bozkurt, S., & Açar, M. F. (2021). Çevrimiçi alışveriş bağlamında tüketiciler tarafından algılanan gizlilik endişesinin kişisel bilgi koruma davranışına etkisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30(3), 181-197. //doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.998460
  7. Bauman, Z. ve Lyon, D. (2013) Akışkan Gözetim Istanbul:Ayrıntı Yayınları
  8. Bäck, E. A., Bäck, H., Fredén, A., & Gustafsson, N. (2019). A social safety net? Rejection sensitivity and political opinion sharing among young people in social media. New Media & Society, 21(2), 298–316. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444818795487
  9. Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., Kobrin, S. J., & Lohse, G. L. (2004). International differences in information privacy concerns: A global survey of consumers. Information Society, 20(5), 314-324.
  10. Bright, L. F., & Lim, H. S. (2021). “Should I Post or Ghost?”: Examining how privacy concerns impact social media engagement in US consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 38(10), 1712-1722. 10.1002/mar.21499
  11. Cain, J., & Imre, I. (2021). Everybody wants some: Collection and control of personal information, privacy concerns, and social media use. New Media & Society, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211000327
  12. Cain, J., Linos, E., & Chretien, K. C. (2019). Cyberbullying in Academic Medicine: A Framework for Managing Social Media Attacks. Academic Medicine, 94(5), 626–629. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002649
  13. Carter Olson, C., & LaPoe, V. (2018). Combating the Digital Spiral of Silence: Academic Activists Versus Social Media Trolls. In J. R. Vickery & T. Everbach (Eds.), Mediating Misogyny: Gender, Technology, and Harassment (pp. 271–291). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_14
  14. Chai, S. (2020, October). Does Cultural Difference Matter on Social Media? An Examination of the Ethical Culture and Information Privacy Concerns. Sustainability, 12(19). 10.3390/su12198286
  15. Chen, H.-T. (2018). Spiral of silence on social media and the moderating role of disagreement and publicness in the network: Analyzing expressive and withdrawal behaviors. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3917–3936. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818763384
  16. Cox, G. C. (2020). Dear Professor, Be Careful with Those Tweets, OK? Academic Freedom and Social Media. PS: Political Science & Politics, 53(3), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000219
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2021). Karma Yöntem Araştırmalarına Giriş (M. Sözbilir, Trans.). Pegem Akademi. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Araştırma Tasarımı. Nobel.
  18. Das, S., & Kramer, A. (2013). Self-Censorship on Facebook. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 7(1), 120–127.
  19. Data Never Sleeps 10.0. (n.d.). Domo. Retrieved October 26, 2022, from https://www.domo.com/data-never-sleeps#
  20. Doerfler, P., Forte, A., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., Blackburn, J., & McCoy, D. (2021). ‘I’m a Professor, which isn’t usually a dangerous job’: Internet-facilitated Harassment and Its Impact on Researchers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 341:1-341:32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476082
  21. Erdoğan, M. (2020). Sosyal Medyada Gözetimin İçselleştirilmesi: İletişim Disiplini Alanındaki Lisansüstü Öğrenciler Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 8(1), 244–275. https://doi.org/10.19145/e-gifder.671276
  22. Feng, Y., Yao, Y., & Sadeh, N. (2021). A Design Space for Privacy Choices: Towards Meaningful Privacy Control in the Internet of Things. CHI ‘21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445148
  23. Gearhart, S., & Zhang, W. (2014). Gay Bullying and Online Opinion Expression: Testing Spiral of Silence in the Social Media Environment. Social Science Computer Review, 32(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313504261 Gearhart, S., & Zhang, W. (2015). “Was It Something I Said?” “No, It Was Something You Posted!” A Study of the Spiral of Silence Theory in Social Media Contexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(4), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0443
  24. Gökaliler, E., & Saatçioğlu, E. (2020). Sosyal Büyük Veri Ekseninde Kişisel Gizlilik Sorunsalı: Türkiye’de Eğitimli ve Kentli Sosyal Ağ Kullanıcılarının Gizlilik Sorunlarına Yaklaşımları. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 58, 133-167. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0085
  25. Hargittai, E., & Marwick, A. (2016). “What Can I Really Do?” Explaining the Privacy Paradox with Online Apathy. International Journal of Communication, 10(0), 21.
  26. Huang, J., Kumar, S., & Hu, C. (2020). Does Culture Matter? A Comparative Study on the Motivations for Online Identity Reconstruction Between China and Malaysia. SAGE Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020929311
  27. Jozani, M., Ayaburi, E., Ko, M., & Choo, K. K. (2020). Privacy concerns and benefits of engagement with social media-enabled apps: A privacy calculus perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 107. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106260
  28. Kesvani, H. (2021, April 26). The future of social media is sharing less, not more. Wired UK. Retrieved October 26, 2022, from https://www.wired.co.uk/article/social-media-future-sharing
  29. Kutlu, A. (2019). Suskunluk sarmali 2.0: türkiye’de facebook kullanimi üzerine bir araştirma. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, 6(1), 43–75. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.528027
  30. Kwon, K. H., Moon, S.-I., & Stefanone, M. A. (2015). Unspeaking on Facebook? Testing network effects on self- censorship of political expressions in social network sites. Quality & Quantity, 49(4), 1417–1435. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11135-014-0078-8
  31. Lambillotte, L., Bart, Y., & Poncin, I. (2022). When Does Information Transparency Reduce Downside of Personalization? Role of Need for Cognition and Perceived Control. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 3(57). Journal of Interactive Marketing
  32. Li, Y. J., Qu, Q. X., & Hao, D. M. (2022). How Does Perceived Overload in Mobile Social Media Influence Users’ Passive Usage Intentions? Considering the Mediating Roles of Privacy Concerns and Social Media Fatigue. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 38(10), 983-992. http://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1986318
  33. Lowry, P. B., Cao, J. W., & Everard, A. (2011). Privacy Concerns Versus Desire for Interpersonal Awareness in Driving the Use of Self-Disclosure Technologies: The Case of Instant Messaging in Two Cultures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 4(27), 163-200. http://doi.org/10.2753/Mis0742-1222270406
  34. Lyon, D. (2013). Gözetim Çalışmaları (A. Toprak, Trans.). Kalkedon.
  35. Mak, M. K.F., Koo, A. Z.Y., & Rojas, H. (2022). Social media engagement against fear of restrictions and surveillance: The mediating role of privacy management. New media and society, 1-22. doi.org/10.1177/14614448221077240
  36. Marder, B., Joinson, A., & Shankar, A. (2012). Every Post You Make, Every Pic You Take, I’ll Be Watching You: Behind Social Spheres on Facebook. 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 859–868. https:// doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.12
  37. Marder, B., Joinson, A., Shankar, A., & Thirlaway, K. (2016). Strength matters: Self-presentation to the strongest audience rather than lowest common denominator when faced with multiple audiences in social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.005
  38. Margulis, S. T. (2003). Journal of Social Issues Journal of Social Issues Full Access Privacy as a Social Issue and Behavioral Concept. Journal of Social İssues, 2(59), 243-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00063
  39. Marwick, A. (2012). The Public Domain: Surveillance in Everyday Life. Surveillance & Society, 9(4), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v9i4.4342
  40. Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
  41. McLaughlin, C., & Vitak, J. (2012). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(2), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811412712
  42. Mohamed, N., & Ahmad, I. H. (2012). Information privacy concerns, antecedents and privacy measure use in social networking sites: Evidence from Malaysia. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2366-2375.
  43. Mutambik, I., Lee, J., Almuqrin, A., Halboob, W., Omar, T., & Floos, A. (2022). User concerns regarding information sharing on social networking sites: The user’s perspective in the context of national culture. Plos One, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263157
  44. Ngcongo, M. (2016). Mobile communication privacy management in romantic relationships: A dialectical approach. Communicatio, 42(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2016.1140666
  45. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The Spiral of Silence A Theory of Public Opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
  46. Pagani, M., Hofacker, C. F., Goldsmith R. E. (2011) The Influence of Personality on Active and Passive Use of Social Networking Sites, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 28(5): 441–456. DOI: 10.1002/mar.20395
  47. Parks, L., Goodwin, H., & Han, L. (2017). “I Have the Government in My Pocket…”: Social Media Users in Turkey, Transmit-Trap Dynamics, and Struggles Over Internet Freedom. Communication, Culture and Critique, 10(4), 574–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12173
  48. Plano Clark, V. L., & Ivankova, N. V. (2018). Karma Yöntemler Araştırması—Alana Yönelik Bir Kılavuz (Ö. Çokluk Bökeoğlu, Trans.). Nobel.
  49. Sleeper, M., Balebako, R., Das, S., McConahy, A. L., Wiese, J., & Cranor, L. F. (2013). The post that wasn’t: Exploring self-censorship on facebook. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ’13, 793. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441865
  50. Stevic, A., Schmuck, D., Koemets, A., Hirsch, M., Karsay, K., & Thomas, M. F. (2021). Privacy concerns can stress you out: Investigating the reciprocal relationship between mobile social media privacy concerns and perceived stress. Communications-European Journal of Communication Research. http://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2020-0037
  51. Stoycheff, E. (2016). Under Surveillance: Examining Facebook’s Spiral of Silence Effects in the Wake of NSA Internet Monitoring. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 296–311. https://doi. org/10.1177/1077699016630255
  52. Suki, N. B. M., Ahamd, M. I., & Thyagarajan, V. (2002). Motivation and concern factors for internet shopping: A Malaysian perspective. The Electronic Journal for E-commerce Tools and Applications, 1(1), 1-18.
  53. Tanczer, L. M., Deibert, R. J., Bigo, D., Franklin, M. I., Melgaço, L., Lyon, D., Kazansky, B., & Milan, S. (2020). Online Surveillance, Censorship, and Encryption in Academia. International Studies Perspectives, 21(1), 1–36. https:// doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekz016
  54. Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2021). How to shape academic freedom in the digital age? Are the retractions of opinionated papers a prelude to “cancel culture” in academia? Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2, 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100035
  55. Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 705–713. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.014
  56. Topbaş, H., & Gazi, M. A. (2016). Sosyal ağlarda gizlilik kaygisinin ölçülmesi: inönü üniversitesi öğrencilerine yönelik bir araştirma. İnönü Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 143-160.
  57. Tosunay, D., & Çolak, F. Ü. (2016). Sosyal medyada otosansür: Facebook örneği. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 4(2), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.19145/gujofoc.95244
  58. Turner, J. J., & Amirnuddin, P. S. (2018). Social Media Privacy and The Law: Perspectives from Malaysian and UK Consumers. The Journal of the South East Asia Research Centre for Communication and Humanities, 10(2), 31-58. Väliverronen, E., & Saikkonen, S. (2021). Freedom of Expression Challenged: Scientists’ Perspectives on Hidden Forms of Suppression and Self-censorship. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(6), 1172–1200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920978303
  59. Van Royen, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., & Adam, P. (2017). “Thinking before posting?” Reducing cyber harassment on social networking sites through a reflective message. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.040
  60. Wang, Y., Norice, G., & Cranor, L. F. (2011). Trust and Trustworthy Computing (Issue 6740) [Conference Proceedings]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21599-5_11
  61. Warner, M., & Wang, V. (2019). Self-censorship in social networking sites (SNSs) – privacy concerns, privacy awareness, perceived vulnerability and information management. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 17(4), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-07-2018-0060
  62. We Are Social (2022). More than 5 billion people now use the internet. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from https:// wearesocial.com/jp/blog/2022/04/more-than-5-billion-people-now-use-the-internet/
  63. Worldometer (2022). Worldometer from https://www.worldometers.info/
  64. Yılmaz, B. S., Doğru, H., & Bahçeci, V. (2017). What if You Cannot Access the Internet in the Surveillance Society? Individuals’ Perceptions Related to the Internet Censorship and Surveillance in Turkey. Journal of Media Critiques, 3(11), 73–86.
  65. Yilmaz, B., & Soylu, D. (2015). Self-Censorship in Social Media: A Case Study of Hacettepe University. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 14(01), 1550010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649215500100
  66. Zhong, B., Sun, T., Zhou, Y., & Xie, L. L. (2022). Privacy matters: reexamining internet privacy concern among social media users in a cross-cultural setting. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 1-18. http://doi.org/10.108 0/15456870.2022.2099548
  67. Zuboff, S. (2021). Gözetleme Kapitalizmi Çağı: Gücün Yeni Sınırında İnsan Geleceği İçin Savaş. (T. Uzunçelebi, Trans.) Istanbul: Okuyan Us Yayınevi.