KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2022 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Yield and Fiber Quality Characteristics of Some Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Cultivars Grown in the Southeastern Anatolian Conditions

Ramazan ASLAN
Yusuf Ziya AYGÜN
Mehmet MERT
Sayfa
285–292
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

PG 2018 are more suitable for cultivation in Batman ecological conditions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to determine cotton cultivars for high yield and fiber technological characters in Southeastern Anatolian ecological conditions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this purpose, the study was carried out with 11 cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars in 2019 and 2020.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:PG 2018 are more suitable for cultivation in Batman ecological conditions.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Cotton · cultivar · fiber yield

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine cotton cultivars for high yield and fiber technological characters in Southeastern Anatolian ecological conditions. For this purpose, the study was carried out with 11 cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars in 2019 and 2020. Field experiment was designed based on randomized complete block design with four replications. The results of combined analysis indicated that there were significant differences between cultivars in terms of yield and quality parameters except for the number of monopodia, fiber strength and fiber fineness. It was determined that cv. Edessa and cv. PG 2018 were superior to other cultivars for seed cotton yield, in respectively 4006.25 kg ha-1, 3971.42 kg ha-1. While these cultivars had higher fiber yield than all others, they were the least affected by the year difference. Cv. PG 2018 also had the highest plant height and ginning turnout. It was concluded that cv. Edessa and cv. PG 2018 are more suitable for cultivation in Batman ecological conditions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ASLAN, R., AYGÜN, Y. Z., MERT, M. (2022). Yield and Fiber Quality Characteristics of Some Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Cultivars Grown in the Southeastern Anatolian Conditions. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 285–292. https://ajindex.com/articles/865171

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Ali, H., R.A. Hameed. 2011. Growth, yield and yield components of American cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as affected by cultivars and nitrogen fertilizer. Int J Eng Sci., 2:1–13.
  2. Anwar, A.M., M.I. Gill, D. Muhammad and M.N. Afzal. 2002. Evaluation of cotton varieties at different doses of nitrogen fertilizer. The Pak. Cottons. 46(1-4): 35-41.
  3. Arshad, M., A. Wajid, M. Maqsood, K. Hussain, M. Aslam, M. Ibrahim. 2007. Response of growth, yield and quality of different cotton cultivars to sowing dates. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 44(2): 208-212.
  4. Aygun, Y.Z. and M. Mert. 2020. Effects of soil conditioners and nitrogen applications on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and fiber technological properties. Biological Diversity and Conservation 13(3): 290-297.
  5. Bechere, E., L. Zeng, R.G. Hardin. 2016. Relationships of lint yield and fiber quality with ginning rate and net ginning energy in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). The Journal of Cotton Science 20:31-39.
  6. Bradow, J.M. and G.H. Davidonis. 2000. Quantitation of fibre quality and the cotton production-processing interface: a physiologist's perspective. Journal of Cotton Science 4: 34– 64. Culp, T.W. 1992. Simultaneous improvement of lint yield and fiber quality in upland cotton. pp. 247-288. In: C.R. Benedict (ed.). Proc. Cotton Fiber Cellulose: Structure, Function, and Utilization Conference. National Cotton Council, Memphis Tenn. Cagirgan, O. and A. Barut. 2000. Traits of cotton varieties of genetic stock in Nazilli Cotton Research Institute. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Directorate of Nazilli Cotton Research Institute, Nazilli-Aydin, Publication No: 58 (in Turkish). Copur, O. 2006. Determination of yield and yield components of some cotton cultivars in semi-arid conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 9: 2572-2578.
  7. Durkal, O. and M. Mert. 2017. Determination of the nitrogen requirement of organically grown cotton cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Mustafa Kemal University 22(2):19- 34 (in Turkish). Ehsan, F., A. Ali, M.A. Nadeem, M. Tahir, A. Majeed. 2008. Comparative yield performance of new cultivars of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci. 6(1): 1-3.
  8. Ertekin, I., I. Atis, Y.Z. Aygun, S. Yilmaz, M. Kizilsimsek. 2022. Effects of different nitrogen doses and cultivars on fermentation quality and nutritive value of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) silages. Anim Biosci., 35(1): 39- 46. Ertekin İ., İ. Atış, Ş. Yılmaz, E. Can, M. Kızılşimşek. 2019. Co