Dergiler / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2026 / Volume: 31 Issue: 2

Biostimulants and Microbial Technologies for Sustainable Field Crops: From Mechanisms to Precision Deployment

Ihsanullah Daur(The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan)0000-0002-9616-0062
Emre İlker(EGE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF FIELD CROPS, DEPARTMENT OF FIELD CROPS)0000-0002-4870-3907
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-12
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The main challenge is no longer finding promising traits, but turning them into reliable, profitable outcomes with proven environmental benefits under real farming conditions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Biological inputs often perform well in controlled studies yet respond inconsistently in farmers’ fields.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Across 1,087 paired observations from 180 open-field studies, non-microbial biostimulants increased yield by 17.9% on average (95% confidence interval: 16.7-19.0%), but this mean masked variation among products, crops, soils, climates and application strategies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The main challenge is no longer finding promising traits, but turning them into reliable, profitable outcomes with proven environmental benefits under real farming conditions.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Climate resilience · Microbiome engineering · Nutrient-use efficiency

Abstract

Biological inputs often perform well in controlled studies yet respond inconsistently in farmers’ fields. This review examines the conditions under which microbial inoculants and non-microbial biostimulants can be deployed as reliable technologies for cereals, grain legumes, oilseeds, fibre, sugar and forage crops. Across 1,087 paired observations from 180 open-field studies, non-microbial biostimulants increased yield by 17.9% on average (95% confidence interval: 16.7-19.0%), but this mean masked variation among products, crops, soils, climates and application strategies. Rhizobia, beneficial bacteria, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Trichoderma, endophytes and designed consortia can improve nitrogen fixation, nutrient mobilisation, root development, stress signalling and rhizosphere function; humic substances, seaweed extracts and protein hydrolysates can strengthen plant acclimation and microbial establishment. We propose a five-fit framework in which reliable field performance depends on crop genotype, soil and resident microbiome, climate and stress timing, formulation and delivery, and management and economics. Biological inputs should therefore be developed and recommended as precision technologies, not universal products. Future progress will depend on identifying effective microbes, developing stable and seed-compatible formulations, tracking their field performance, and predicting response, risk and economic return. The main challenge is no longer finding promising traits, but turning them into reliable, profitable outcomes with proven environmental benefits under real farming conditions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Daur, I., İlker, E. (2026). Biostimulants and Microbial Technologies for Sustainable Field Crops: From Mechanisms to Precision Deployment. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Volume: 31 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.2007464

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (48)

  1. Backer R, Rokem JS, Ilangumaran G, Lamont J, Praslickova D, Ricci E, Subramanian S, Smith DL. (2018). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 9:1473. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01473
  2. Bashan Y, de-Bashan LE, Prabhu SR, Hernández JP. (2014). Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: Formulations and practical perspectives (1998–2013). Plant Soil. 378:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1956-x
  3. Begum N, Qin C, Ahanger MA, Raza S, Khan MI, Ashraf M, Ahmed N, Zhang L. (2019). Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth regulation: Implications in abiotic stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 10:1068. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01068
  4. Bhatla SC, Ranjan P, Singh N, Gogna M. (2023). Pure biochemicals and nanomaterials as next generation biostimulants for sustainable agriculture under abiotic stress – recent advances and future scope. Plant Signal Behav. 18(1):2290336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2023.2290336
  5. Canellas LP, Olivares FL, Aguiar NO, Jones DL, Nebbioso A, Mazzei P, Piccolo A. (2015). Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-015-0040-6
  6. Chami B, Touzout N, Guemouri-Athmani S, Baali-Cherif D, Mihoub A, Černý J, Saeed MF, Jamal A, Yassine HM, Dewir YH, Scavo A. (2024). Bacterial inoculation and co-inoculation improves durum wheat productivity in alkaline calcareous soils. Phyton-Int J Exp Bot. 93(12):3313–3329. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2024.059865
  7. Chen H, Xiong L. (2005). Pyridoxine is required for post-embryonic root development and tolerance to osmotic and oxidative stresses. Plant J. 44(3):396–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02538.x
  8. Colla G, Nardi S, Cardarelli M, Ertani A, Lucini L, Canaguier R, Rouphael Y. (2015). Protein hydrolysates as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic. 196:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.037
  9. Compant S, Samad A, Faist H, Sessitsch A. (2019). A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. J Adv Res. 19:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004
  10. du Jardin P. 2015. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci Hortic. 196:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
  11. European Parliament and Council. (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 laying down rules on the making available on the market of EU fertilising products. Off J Eur Union. L170:1–114.
  12. Fassih B, Ben-Laouane R, Fakhech A, Ait-El-Mokhtar M, Wahbi S. (2026). Biostimulants for sustainable and resilient agriculture. Sustainability. 18(14):7342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147342
  13. Finkel OM, Salas-Gonzalez I, Castrillo G, Conway JM, Law TF, Teixeira PJPL, Wilson ED, Fitzpatrick CR, Jones CD, Dangl JL. (2020). A single bacterial genus maintains root growth in a complex microbiome. Nature. 587:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2778-7
  14. Francioli D, Kampouris ID, Kuhl-Nagel T, Babin D, Sommermann L, Behr JH, Chowdhury SP, Zrenner R, Moradtalab N, Schloter M, Geistlinger J, Ludewig U, Neumann G, Smalla K, Grosch R. (2025). Microbial inoculants modulate the rhizosphere microbiome, alleviate plant stress responses, and enhance maize growth at field scale. Genome Biol. 26:148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03621-7
  15. Glick BR. (2014). Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol Res. 169:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.009
  16. Hanif MS, Tayyab M, Baillo EH, Islam MM, Islam W, Li X. (2024). Plant microbiome technology for sustainable agriculture. Front Microbiol. 15:1500260. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1500260
  17. Hungria M, Campo RJ, Souza EM, Pedrosa FO. (2010). Inoculation with selected strains of Azospirillum brasilense and A. lipoferum improves yields of maize and wheat in Brazil. Plant Soil. 331:413–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0262-0
  18. Izquierdo J, Arriagada O, García-Pintos G, Ortiz R, García-Pintos M, García-Pintos M. (2025). Humic field biostimulation as a sustainable agricultural practice to increase yield of main grains: Evidence from on-farm trials. Front Plant Sci. 16:1709876. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1709876
  19. Ke J, Wang B, Yoshikuni Y. (2021). Microbiome engineering: Synthetic biology of plant-associated microbiomes in sustainable agriculture. Trends Biotechnol. 39:244–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.07.008
  20. Khan H, Akbar WA, Shah Z, Rahim HU, Taj A, Alatalo JM. (2022). Coupling phosphate-solubilizing bacteria with inorganic phosphorus fertilizer improves mungbean phosphorus acquisition, nitrogen fixation, and yield in alkaline-calcareous soil. Heliyon. 8:e09081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09081
  21. Kleinbölting N, Fiore A, Cangioli L, Visca A, Huang L, Hett J, Costanzo M, Sevi F, Tabacchioni S, Aprea G, Mengoni A, Pihlanto A, Neuhoff D, Sczyrba A, Schlüter A, Bevivino A. (2026). Impact of microbial consortia and fertilization regimes on the soil microbiome in maize field trials. Sci Rep. 16:17313. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47528-0
  22. Koziol L, McKenna TP, Bever JD. (2025). Meta-analysis reveals globally sourced commercial mycorrhizal inoculants fall short. New Phytol. 246:821–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20278
  23. Lau SE, Teo WFA, Teoh EY, Tan BC. (2022). Microbiome engineering and plant biostimulants for sustainable crop improvement and mitigation of biotic and abiotic stresses. Discov Food. 2:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-022-00009-5
  24. Li J, Van Gerrewey T, Geelen D. (2022). A meta-analysis of biostimulant yield effectiveness in field trials. Front Plant Sci. 13:836702. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.836702
  25. Li J, Wang J, Liu H, Macdonald CA, Singh BK. (2023). Microbial inoculants with higher capacity to colonize soils improved wheat drought tolerance. Microb Biotechnol. 16:2131–2144. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14350
  26. Lutz S, Bodenhausen N, Hess J, Valzano-Held A, Waelchli J, Deslandes-Herold G, Schlaeppi K, van der Heijden MGA. (2023). Soil microbiome indicators can predict crop growth response to large-scale inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nat Microbiol. 8:2277–2289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-023-01520-w
  27. Ma B, Lu C, Wang Y, Yu J, Zhao K, Xue R, Ren H, Lv X, Pan R, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Xu J. (2023). A genomic catalogue of soil microbiomes boosts mining of biodiversity and genetic resources. Nat Commun. 14:7318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43000-z
  28. Marcos AW, Tomaz JP, Nogueira AF, Mosela M, Alves DS, dos Santos Neto J, Watanabe LS, Afonso L, Faria MV, Scislowski L, Fagundes DFV, Cava HB, Cabral PDS, Wisniewski da Conceição R, de Assis R, de Azevedo SV, Candido LS, Gonçalves LSA. (2026). Bacillus velezensis Ag129 and Ag132: Two novel probiotics enhancing drought tolerance and agronomic performance in maize and soybean. Front Plant Sci. 17:1711687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1711687
  29. Melini F, Luziatelli F, Bonini P, Ficca AG, Melini V, Ruzzi M. (2023). Optimization of the growth conditions through response surface methodology and metabolomics for maximizing the auxin production by Pantoea agglomerans C1. Front Microbiol. 14:1022248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1022248
  30. Mitter EK, Tosi M, Obregon D, Dunfield KE, Germida JJ. (2021). Rethinking crop nutrition in times of modern microbiology: Innovative biofertilizer technologies. Front Sustain Food Syst. 5:606815. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.606815
  31. Molina-Favero C, Sánchez Rizza L, González Olano AM, Maroniche G, Polizzi M, de Gerónimo E, Creus C, Curatti L, Pagnussat LA. (2026). Eukaryotic microalgae-bacteria synthetic consortia boost crop productivity and drought tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Front Plant Sci. 16:1726084. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1726084
  32. Moreno-Lora A, Sousa-Ortega C, Recena R, Perea-Torres F, Delgado A. (2023). Microbial inoculants improve nutrients uptake and yield of durum wheat in calcareous soils under drought stress in the Mediterranean region. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 69(11):2233–2247. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2022.2146099
  33. O'Callaghan M. (2016). Microbial inoculation of seed for improved crop performance: Issues and opportunities. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 100:5729–5746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7590-9
  34. Olanrewaju OS, Glick BR, Babalola OO. (2017). Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 33:197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-017-2364-9
  35. Patil SD, Jobanputra AH, Upadhye VJ, Mujahid MH, Ahmed S. (2026). Field evaluation of novel PGPM consortium bioinoculants for growth regulation and yield enhancement in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.). BMC Plant Biol. 26:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-07909-5 Peiffer JA, Spor A, Koren O, Jin Z, Tringe SG, Dangl JL, Buckler ES, Ley RE. (2013). Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110:6548–6553. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302837110 Ricci M, Tilbury L, Daridon B, Sukalac K. (2019). General principles to justify plant biostimulant claims. Front Plant Sci. 10:494. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00494 Rieder S, Conen F, Krauss M. (2025). Microbial inoculant has little effect on greenhouse gas emissions following cover crop incorporation. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 379:109332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109332
  36. Rouphael Y, Colla G. (2018). Synergistic biostimulatory action: Designing the next generation of plant biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 9:1655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01655
  37. Schütz L, Gattinger A, Meier M, Müller A, Boller T, Mäder P, Mathimaran N. (2018). Improving crop yield and nutrient use efficiency via biofertilization: A global meta-analysis. Front Plant Sci. 8:2204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02204
  38. Shukla PS, Mantin EG, Adil M, Bajpai S, Critchley AT, Prithiviraj B. (2019). Ascophyllum nodosum-based biostimulants: Sustainable applications in agriculture for the stimulation of plant growth, stress tolerance, and disease management. Front Plant Sci. 10:655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00655
  39. Sible CN, Seebauer JR, Below FE. (2021). Plant biostimulants: A categorical review, their implications for row crop production, and relation to soil health indicators. Agronomy. 11:1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071297
  40. Steen AD, Crits-Christoph A, Carini P, DeAngelis KM, Fierer N, Lloyd KG, Thrash JC. (2019). High proportions of bacteria and archaea across most biomes remain uncultured. ISME J. 13:3126–3130. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0484-y
  41. Sundara B, Natarajan V, Hari K. (2002). Influence of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on the changes in soil available phosphorus and sugarcane and sugar yields. Field Crops Res. 77:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00048-5
  42. Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sá T, Singh BK. 2020. Plant-microbiome interactions: From community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 18:607–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1
  43. Van Oosten MJ, Pepe O, De Pascale S, Silletti S, Maggio A. (2017). The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 4:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-017-0089-5
  44. Vasconcelos JCS, Arantes CS, Gomes EA, Oliveira-Paiva CA, de Sousa SM, Speranza EA, Antunes JFG, Lana UGP, Cançado GMA. (2025). Bacillus-based inoculants enhance drought resilience in soybean: Agronomic performance and remote sensing analysis from multi-location trials in Brazil. Front Plant Sci. 16:1630127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1630127
  45. Vurukonda SSKP, Vardharajula S, Shrivastava M, SkZ A. (2016). Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res. 184:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.12.003
  46. Walters WA, Jin Z, Youngblut N, Wallace JG, Sutter J, Zhang W, González-Peña A, Peiffer J, Koren O, Shi Q, Knight R, del Rio TG, Tringe SG, Buckler ES, Dangl JL, Ley RE. (2018). Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 115:7368–7373. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800918115
  47. Zhang P, Guo Z, Ullah S, Melagraki G, Afantitis A, Lynch I. (2021). Nanotechnology and artificial intelligence to enable sustainable and precision agriculture. Nat Plants. 7:864–876. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-00946-6
  48. Zirak- Qoturbulagh, M. A., Mehri, S., Soleimanzadeh, H., & Ansari, M. H. (2025). Co-Inoculation of Bradyrhizobium and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Alleviates the Effects of Drought Stress in Soybean (Glycine max L.). Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, 30(1), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1519684