Dergiler / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 169 - Sayı: 169

Assessment of crustal thinning and tectonic stress distribution of Gülbahçe fault zone and its surroundings (İzmir, West Türkiye) using gravity and magnetic anomalies

Sayfa
105–119
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The deviatoric stress values were between -0.2-0.1 MPa.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Gülbahçe Fault Zone (GFZ) is a significant tectonic structure and seismic source for İzmir city and its surroundings.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The major earthquakes occurred at the surroundings of GFZ are 2005 Seferihisar, 2020 Samos Island-Aegean Sea and 2021 Seferihisar earthquakes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The deviatoric stress values were between -0.2-0.1 MPa.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2005 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Bouguer Gravity Anomaly · Gülbahçe Fault Zone (GFZ) · Magnetic

Abstract

Gülbahçe Fault Zone (GFZ) is a significant tectonic structure and seismic source for İzmir city and its surroundings. The major earthquakes occurred at the surroundings of GFZ are 2005 Seferihisar, 2020 Samos Island-Aegean Sea and 2021 Seferihisar earthquakes. In this study, the crustal thinning and tectonic stress distribution of GFZ and its surroundings were analyzed by using the new gravity and magnetic data. The correspondence analysis was applied by appraising together the magnetic and free-air anomaly data. Moreover, the average density of the subsurface structure was calculated by applying the Parasnis method. The deviatoric stress calculation was executed and the change of the physical properties that controls the gravity and magnetic anomaly of the crustal structure of the GFZ and its surroundings from north to south was investigated. Therefore, the average density values, which were obtained from gravity anomalies, were computed as 2.59 gr / cm3 in the north of the study region and it decreased to 2.06, 1.8 and 1.49 gr / cm3 towards to the south. The freeair gravity anomaly values were between 0-70 mGal and the magnetic anomalies were between -450-150 nT. The deviatoric stress values were between -0.2-0.1 MPa.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PAMUKÇU, O., ÇIRMIK, A., DOĞRU, F., ÜNLÜ, E., MALALİÇİ, B. C. (2022). Assessment of crustal thinning and tectonic stress distribution of Gülbahçe fault zone and its surroundings (İzmir, West Türkiye) using gravity and magnetic anomalies. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 169 - Sayı: 169, 105–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/861039

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Aadnoy, B., Looyeh, R. 2019. Petroleum Rock Mechanics: Drilling Operations and Well Design. Gulf Professional Publishing. 460. Akıncı, A., Eyidoğan, H., Göktürkler, G., Akyol, N., Ankaya, O. 2000. İzmir ili çevresinin depremselliği ve deprem tehlikesinin incelenmesi. Batı Anadolu’nun Depremselliği Sempozyumu (BADSEM 2000)
  2. İzmir, Bildiri Kitabı, 231-238 (in Turkish). Aktuğ, B., Kılıçoğlu, A. 2006.
  3. Recent crustal deformation of Izmir, Western Anatolia and surrounding regions as deduced from repeated GPS measurements and strain field. Journal of Geodynamics 41, 471-484.
  4. Ambraseys, N. N. 1988. Engineering seismology. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamical 17, 1–105.
  5. Arslan, S., Akın, U., Alaca, A. 2010. Gravite verileri ile Türkiye' nin kabuk yapısının incelenmesi. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 140, 57-73.
  6. Baba, A, Şaroğlu, F., Akkuş, I., Özel, N., Yeşilnacar, M. İ., Nalbantçılar, M. T., Demir, M. M., Gökçen, G., Arslan, Ş., Dursun, N., Uzelli, T., Yazdani, H. 2019. Geological and hydrogeochemical properties of geothermal systems in the southeastern region of Turkey. Geothermics 78, 255-271.
  7. Barka, A. A., Kadinsky Cade, K. 1988. Strike‐ slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity. Tectonics 7, 663-684.
  8. Bozkurt, E. 2001. Neotectonics of Turkey- a synthesis. Geodinamica Acta 14, 3-30.
  9. Çetiner, M. 2012. İzmir ve çevresindeki mikrogravite verilerinin değerlendirilmesi. MSc Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, The Graduate School of Nature and Applied Sciences, 78, İzmir.
  10. Çırmık, A., Ozdag, O. C., Doğru, F., Pamuk, E., Gonenc, T., Pamukcu, O., Akgün, M., Arslan, A. T. 2016. The soil behaviours of the GNSS station. Earth Sciences 5(5), 70-81.
  11. Çırmık, A., Pamukçu, O. 2017. Clarifying the interplate main tectonic elements of Western Anatolia, Turkey by using GNSS velocities and Bouguer gravity anomalies. Journal of Asian Earth Science 148, 294-304.
  12. Çırmık, A., Doğru, F., Gönenç, T., Pamukçu, O. 2017a. The stress / strain analysis of kinematic structure at Gülbahçe Fault and Uzunkuyu Intrusive (İzmir, Turkey). Pure and Applied Geophysics 174(3), 1425-1440.
  13. Çırmık, A., Pamukçu, O., Gönenç, T., Kahveci, M., Şalk, M., Herring, T. 2017b. Examination of the kinematic structures in İzmir (Western Anatolia) with repeated GPS observations (2009, 2010 and 2011). Journal of African Earth Sciences 126, 1-12.
  14. De Ritis, R., Ventura, G., Chiappini, M., Carluccio, R., Von Frese, R. 2010. Regional magnetic and gravity anomaly correlations