Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 169 - Sayı: 169

Assessment of crustal thinning and tectonic stress distribution of Gülbahçe fault zone and its surroundings (İzmir, West Türkiye) using gravity and magnetic anomalies

Pages
105–119
Publication Date
2022-12-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The deviatoric stress values were between -0.2-0.1 MPa.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gülbahçe Fault Zone (GFZ) is a significant tectonic structure and seismic source for İzmir city and its surroundings.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The major earthquakes occurred at the surroundings of GFZ are 2005 Seferihisar, 2020 Samos Island-Aegean Sea and 2021 Seferihisar earthquakes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The deviatoric stress values were between -0.2-0.1 MPa.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bouguer Gravity Anomaly · Gülbahçe Fault Zone (GFZ) · Magnetic

Abstract

Gülbahçe Fault Zone (GFZ) is a significant tectonic structure and seismic source for İzmir city and its surroundings. The major earthquakes occurred at the surroundings of GFZ are 2005 Seferihisar, 2020 Samos Island-Aegean Sea and 2021 Seferihisar earthquakes. In this study, the crustal thinning and tectonic stress distribution of GFZ and its surroundings were analyzed by using the new gravity and magnetic data. The correspondence analysis was applied by appraising together the magnetic and free-air anomaly data. Moreover, the average density of the subsurface structure was calculated by applying the Parasnis method. The deviatoric stress calculation was executed and the change of the physical properties that controls the gravity and magnetic anomaly of the crustal structure of the GFZ and its surroundings from north to south was investigated. Therefore, the average density values, which were obtained from gravity anomalies, were computed as 2.59 gr / cm3 in the north of the study region and it decreased to 2.06, 1.8 and 1.49 gr / cm3 towards to the south. The freeair gravity anomaly values were between 0-70 mGal and the magnetic anomalies were between -450-150 nT. The deviatoric stress values were between -0.2-0.1 MPa.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAMUKÇU, O., ÇIRMIK, A., DOĞRU, F., ÜNLÜ, E., MALALİÇİ, B. C. (2022). Assessment of crustal thinning and tectonic stress distribution of Gülbahçe fault zone and its surroundings (İzmir, West Türkiye) using gravity and magnetic anomalies. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 169 - Sayı: 169, 105–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/861039

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aadnoy, B., Looyeh, R. 2019. Petroleum Rock Mechanics: Drilling Operations and Well Design. Gulf Professional Publishing. 460. Akıncı, A., Eyidoğan, H., Göktürkler, G., Akyol, N., Ankaya, O. 2000. İzmir ili çevresinin depremselliği ve deprem tehlikesinin incelenmesi. Batı Anadolu’nun Depremselliği Sempozyumu (BADSEM 2000)
  2. İzmir, Bildiri Kitabı, 231-238 (in Turkish). Aktuğ, B., Kılıçoğlu, A. 2006.
  3. Recent crustal deformation of Izmir, Western Anatolia and surrounding regions as deduced from repeated GPS measurements and strain field. Journal of Geodynamics 41, 471-484.
  4. Ambraseys, N. N. 1988. Engineering seismology. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamical 17, 1–105.
  5. Arslan, S., Akın, U., Alaca, A. 2010. Gravite verileri ile Türkiye' nin kabuk yapısının incelenmesi. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 140, 57-73.
  6. Baba, A, Şaroğlu, F., Akkuş, I., Özel, N., Yeşilnacar, M. İ., Nalbantçılar, M. T., Demir, M. M., Gökçen, G., Arslan, Ş., Dursun, N., Uzelli, T., Yazdani, H. 2019. Geological and hydrogeochemical properties of geothermal systems in the southeastern region of Turkey. Geothermics 78, 255-271.
  7. Barka, A. A., Kadinsky Cade, K. 1988. Strike‐ slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity. Tectonics 7, 663-684.
  8. Bozkurt, E. 2001. Neotectonics of Turkey- a synthesis. Geodinamica Acta 14, 3-30.
  9. Çetiner, M. 2012. İzmir ve çevresindeki mikrogravite verilerinin değerlendirilmesi. MSc Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, The Graduate School of Nature and Applied Sciences, 78, İzmir.
  10. Çırmık, A., Ozdag, O. C., Doğru, F., Pamuk, E., Gonenc, T., Pamukcu, O., Akgün, M., Arslan, A. T. 2016. The soil behaviours of the GNSS station. Earth Sciences 5(5), 70-81.
  11. Çırmık, A., Pamukçu, O. 2017. Clarifying the interplate main tectonic elements of Western Anatolia, Turkey by using GNSS velocities and Bouguer gravity anomalies. Journal of Asian Earth Science 148, 294-304.
  12. Çırmık, A., Doğru, F., Gönenç, T., Pamukçu, O. 2017a. The stress / strain analysis of kinematic structure at Gülbahçe Fault and Uzunkuyu Intrusive (İzmir, Turkey). Pure and Applied Geophysics 174(3), 1425-1440.
  13. Çırmık, A., Pamukçu, O., Gönenç, T., Kahveci, M., Şalk, M., Herring, T. 2017b. Examination of the kinematic structures in İzmir (Western Anatolia) with repeated GPS observations (2009, 2010 and 2011). Journal of African Earth Sciences 126, 1-12.
  14. De Ritis, R., Ventura, G., Chiappini, M., Carluccio, R., Von Frese, R. 2010. Regional magnetic and gravity anomaly correlations