KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

How do we say NO in Turkish?: A corpus-based analysis of hayır and cık in Turkish

-

Betül Bal-Gezegin
Sayfa
53–73
Yayın Tarihi
2013-11-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Keywords: Pragmatic markers, Turkish, hayır, cık, Pragmatic function, Spoken Turkish Corpus (STC)

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to investigate the use of two pragmatic markers in Turkish language: hayır and cık.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To examine these markers recordings of naturally occurring conversations among people whose L1 is Turkish are obtained from Spoken Turkish Corpus (STC).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Keywords: Pragmatic markers, Turkish, hayır, cık, Pragmatic function, Spoken Turkish Corpus (STC)
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Edimbilimsel belirleyici · Türkçe · hayır

Özet

This study aims to investigate the use of two pragmatic markers in Turkish language: hayır and cık. Hayır is a word meaning no, whereas cık stands as a representation of a sound uttered with the intention of saying no. These two markers, which can be traditionally accepted as no in English, are analyzed in terms of their distributions and pragmatic functions as pragmatic markers. To examine these markers recordings of naturally occurring conversations among people whose L1 is Turkish are obtained from Spoken Turkish Corpus (STC). The results show that there are similarities and differences in the use of hayır and cık in terms of their syntactic properties and pragmatic functions. Keywords: Pragmatic markers, Turkish, hayır, cık, Pragmatic function, Spoken Turkish Corpus (STC)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the use of two pragmatic markers in Turkish language: hayır and cık. Hayır is a word meaning no, whereas cık stands as a representation of a sound uttered with the intention of saying no. These two markers, which can be traditionally accepted as no in English, are analyzed in terms of their distributions and pragmatic functions as pragmatic markers. To examine these markers recordings of naturally occurring conversations among people whose L1 is Turkish are obtained from Spoken Turkish Corpus (STC). The results show that there are similarities and differences in the use of hayır and cık in terms of their syntactic properties and pragmatic functions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Bal-Gezegin, B. (2013). How do we say NO in Turkish?: A corpus-based analysis of hayır and cık in Turkish. Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 53–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/828348

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Aijmer, K. (2002). English discourse particles. Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Aijmer, K. & Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (2004). A model and a methodology for the study of pragmatic markers: The semantic field of expectation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1781-1805. André, V. (2005). Oui-non: Une pratique discursive sous influence. Marges Linguistiques, 9, 195-213.
  2. Arndt, W. (1960). Modal particles in Russian and German. Word, 16, 323–336.
  3. Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum. Bazzanella, C. (1990). Phatic connective as interactional cues in contemporary spoken Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 629-647.
  4. Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell. Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Burridge, K. & Florey, M. (2002). ‘Yeah-no He’s a Good Kid’: A discourse analysis of Yeah-no in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 149-171.
  6. Büyükkantarcıoğlu, N. (2006). An analysis of Turkish interjections in the context of reactive idea framing. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (1), 19Crystal, D. (1988). Another look at well, you know … English Today 13, 47-49.
  7. Çubukçu, H. (2005). Karşılıklı konuşmada destekleyici geri bildirim. XVIII. Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri, (pp. 289-304).
  8. Ankara.
  9. Drummond, K. & Hopper, R. (1993). Some uses of yeah. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26, 203–212.
  10. Feng, G. (2006). A theory of conventional implicature and pragmatic markers in Chinese. Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Reading. Fischer, K. (2000). Discourse particles, turn-taking, and the semantics-pragmatics interface. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique, 8, 111-137.
  11. Fraser, B. (1996). Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 6 (2), 167-90.
  12. Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 931-952.
  13. Fuller, J. M. (2003). The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 23-45.
  14. Gülich, E. (1970). Makrosyntax der Gliederungssignale im gesprochenen Französisch. München. Horn, L. (1985). Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language, 61, 121-17
  15. Jefferson, G., (1984). Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens ‘yeah’ and ‘mmhm’. Papers in Linguistics, 17