Dergiler / Afro Eurasian Studies / 2012 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Education and Consumption Differentials: Evidence from an Emerging Country

Sayfa
69–75
Yayın Tarihi
2012-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Regression analysis shows that one extra year of schooling increases consumption by 10.2 percent on average and people with a graduate degree consume about 201.6 percent more than illiterate people in Turkey

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper investigates the effects of education level on consumption in an emerging country by using the 2004 Turkish Household Budget Survey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:There is no person with a graduate degree found in the poorest twenty percent and only 0.18 percent of poorest quintile consists of people with a bachelor degree.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Regression analysis shows that one extra year of schooling increases consumption by 10.2 percent on average and people with a graduate degree consume about 201.6 percent more than illiterate people in Turkey
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2004 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Education level · Consumption · Turkish Household Budget Survey.

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of education level on consumption in an emerging country by using the 2004 Turkish Household Budget Survey. Education level is very important in determining consumption quintiles. There is no person with a graduate degree found in the poorest twenty percent and only 0.18 percent of poorest quintile consists of people with a bachelor degree. Regression analysis shows that one extra year of schooling increases consumption by 10.2 percent on average and people with a graduate degree consume about 201.6 percent more than illiterate people in Turkey

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ODUNCU, A. (2012). Education and Consumption Differentials: Evidence from an Emerging Country. Afro Eurasian Studies, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 69–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/823805

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Card D. (1999) “The casual effect of education on earnings.” In: Handbook of Labour Economics, O.Ashenfelter and D.Card (eds.), Amsterdam: North Holland Cohn, E., and J.T. Addison. (1998), “The economic returns to lifelong learning.” Education Economics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 253–308.
  2. Cutler, D., and L. Katz. (1992). “Rising inequality? Changes in the distribution of income and consumption in the 1980’s.” American Economic Review, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 546–551.
  3. Deaton, A. and C. Paxson. (1994). “Intertemporal choice and inequality.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 437–467.
  4. Duygan, B. and N. Guner. (2006) “Income and consumption inequality in Turkey: What role does education play?” In: The Turkish Economy: The Real Economy, Corporate Governance and Reform and Stabilization Policy. S. Altuğ and A. Filiztekin (eds.), Chapter 2, Oxon, OX: Routledge Curzon Studies in Middle Eastern Economies. Krueger, D., and F. Perri. (2002). “Does income inequality lead to consumption inequality.” NBER Working Paper no. 9202. Mayer, S. and C. Jencks. (1993). “Recent trends in economic inequality in the United States: Income versus expenditures versus well-being.” In: Poverty and Prosperity in the USA in the Late Twentieth Century, Papadimitriou, D and E. Wol. (eds.), Chapter 27, New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
  5. Mincer, J. (1974). “Schooling, experience, and earnings”, New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research. Psacharopoulos, G. (1985). “Returns to education: A further international update and implications”, Journal of Human Resources, vol. 20, no.4, pp. 583-604.
  6. Psacharopoulos, G. (1994). “Returns to investment in education: A global update”, World Development, vol. 22, no.9, pp. 1325–1343.