Dergiler / Uluslararası Spor Egzersiz ve Antrenman Bilimi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

The effect of high-intensity functional exercises on anthropometric and physiological characteristics in sedantery

Sayfa
64–69
Yayın Tarihi
2018-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: As a result, it can be said that these high-intensity exercises that were applied has positive contribution to anthropometric and physiological characteristics in sedanteries.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Group-based training through Crossfit has recently exploded in popularity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Their age averages are 23.62±5.39 (year), height averages are 177±0.06 (cm) and body weight averages are 79.88±12.14 (kg).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: As a result, it can be said that these high-intensity exercises that were applied has positive contribution to anthropometric and physiological characteristics in sedanteries.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Physical fitness · Crossfit · High-intensity exercise

Abstract

Aim: Group-based training through Crossfit has recently exploded in popularity. When the effects of Crossfit trainings on many basic component are considered, the aim of this study is to investigate the effects of high-intensity functional trainings on anthropometric and physiological characteristics of sedentary individuals. Methods: Their age averages are 23.62±5.39 (year), height averages are 177±0.06 (cm) and body weight averages are 79.88±12.14 (kg). Crossfit training system was applied during high-intensity functional exercise planning at four days a week, for twelve weeks. Body weight, body fat percentage, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, resting heart rate, hand grip strength, back strength, leg strength measurements were taken from the participants. Statistical analyses were done with SPSS 15.00 statistical package program.Results: In pre-test and post-test measurements, it was found that there are statistically significant differences between the participants’ body fat percentage, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, left and right hand grip, back strength and leg strength values (p<0.05). Conclusion: As a result, it can be said that these high-intensity exercises that were applied has positive contribution to anthropometric and physiological characteristics in sedanteries.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DİLBER, A. O., DOĞRU, Y. (2018). The effect of high-intensity functional exercises on anthropometric and physiological characteristics in sedantery. Uluslararası Spor Egzersiz ve Antrenman Bilimi Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 64–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/818978

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Aslan, C. S., Büyükdere, C., Köklü, Y., Özkan, A., & Özdemir, F. N. Ş. (2011). Elit altı sporcularda vücut kompozisyonu, anaerobik performans ve sırt kuvveti arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8, 1612-1628.
  2. Babiash, P., Porcari, J., Steffen, J., Doberstein, S., & Foster, C. (2013). CrossFit: New research puts popular workout to the test. Ace ProSource (November), 4. Barfield, J., Channell, B., Pugh, C., Tuck, M., & Pendel, D. (2012). Format of basic instruction program resistance training classes: effect on fitness change in college students. Physical Educator, 69(4), 325. Bergeron, M. F., Nindl, B. C., Deuster, P. A., Baumgartner, N., Kane, S. F., Kraemer, W. J., & O'connor, F. G. (2011). Consortium for Health and Military Performance and American College of Sports Medicine consensus paper on extreme conditioning programs in military personnel. Current sports medicine reports, 10(6), 383-389.
  3. Butcher, S. J., Neyedly, T. J., Horvey, K. J., & Benko, C. R. (2015). Do physiological measures predict selected crossFit® benchmark performance? Open access journal of sports medicine, 6, 241. Claudino, J. G., Gabbett, T. J., Bourgeois, F., de Sá Souza, H., Miranda, R. C., Mezêncio, B & Hernandez, A. J. (2018). CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports medicine-open, 4(1), 11. Eather, N., Morgan, P. J., & Lubans, D. R. (2016). Improving health-related fitness in adolescents: the CrossFit Teens™ randomised controlled trial. Journal of sports sciences, 34(3), 209-223.
  4. Gerhart, D., & Pasternostro Bayles, M. (2014). A Comparison of CrossFit Training to Traditional Anaerobic Resistance Training in Terms of Selected Fitness Domains Representative of Overall Athletic Performance. Paper presented at the International Journal of Exercise Science: Conference Proceedings. Glassman, G. (2002). What is fitness? CrossFit Journal, 1(3), 1-11.
  5. Glassman, G. (2006). Validity of crossfit tested. The CrossFit Journal, 41. Glassman, G. (2010). The crossfit training guide. CrossFit Journal, 1-115.
  6. Glassman, G. (2010). CrossFit Training Guide Level 1. Goins, J. M. (2014). Physiological and Performance effects of CrossFit: The University of Alabama. Gregory, R. M., Hamdan, H., Torisky, D., & Akers, J. (2017). A low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet combined with 6-weeks of crossfit training improves body composition and performance. Int. J. Sports Exer. Med, 3, 1-10.
  7. Güllü, A., & Güllü, E. (2001). Genel Antrenman Bilgisi. Umut Matbaacılı