KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Examination of the ınfluence of leadership Characteristics of Volleyball Coaches on Their Self-Efficacy

Enes ÖZDEMİR
Abdurrahman KEPOĞLU
İlker GÜNEL
Sayfa
11–23
Yayın Tarihi
2021-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

With these long years of work, a lot of emphasis has been placed on this issue today, and new ideas have emerged.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to examine the effect of the leadership characteristics of volleyball trainers on their self-efficacy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sample of the study, which was determined with the convenience sampling technique, one of the improbable sampling methods, consists of 60 male trainers working in the first league, second league and third league.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:With these long years of work, a lot of emphasis has been placed on this issue today, and new ideas have emerged.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2002 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Volleyball Coaches · leadership · Self-Efficacy

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of the leadership characteristics of volleyball trainers on their self-efficacy. The target population of this study, which is carried out with general screening management, one of the quantitative research designs, consists of trainers working in the first league, second league and third league. The sample of the study, which was determined with the convenience sampling technique, one of the improbable sampling methods, consists of 60 male trainers working in the first league, second league and third league. The "Self-Efficacy Scale" developed by Riggs, Warka, Babasa, Betancourt and Hooker (1994) and adapted into Turkish by Öcel (2002) and "Sports Leadership Scale" developed by Chelladurai and Saleh (1980) and adapted into Turkish by Tiryaki and Toros (2001) were used. One way Anova, correlation and regression analyzes were performed by using average values in analyzing the data for determining the leadership and self-efficacy levels of the trainers. Leadership and self-efficacy concepts were explained in detail and the effects of this concept on trainers were examined. As a result, it has been determined that there is a relationship between the leadership styles of the trainers and their self-efficacy. Currently, leadership is quite prominent. The issue of leadership has started to be studied and examined a lot in recent years with the desire of individuals to be leaders in the group, and a lot of studies have been done on this subject. As a result of the studies about leadership, many definitions and assumptions have emerged. With these long years of work, a lot of emphasis has been placed on this issue today, and new ideas have emerged.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZDEMİR, E., KEPOĞLU, A., GÜNEL, İ. (2021). Examination of the ınfluence of leadership Characteristics of Volleyball Coaches on Their Self-Efficacy. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 11–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/806997

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Eren, E. (2000). Organizational Behavior and Management Psychology. İstanbul:
  2. Beta Publications. Genç D.A. (1998)
  3. Sports Law, Alfa Publications, İstanbul.
  4. Bass, B.M., (1990). Bass&Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership, Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, 3.Edition,
  5. The Free Press,
  6. New York Karadağ, E., Başaran, A. ve Korkmaz, T. (2009). The Relationship between the Leadership Styles and Job Satisfaction As Perceived By Teachers in Turkish Elementary Schools, Balıkesır University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 12 (21), 32- 4 Turan, S., Karadağ, E., Bektaş, F. ve Yalçın, M. (2014). Knowledge Production in Educational Administration in Turkey: An Overview of Researches in Journal of Educational Administration: Theory and Practice -2003 to 2013- Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 20 (1), 93-119. Demi̇rel, E, Yatkın, A, Düşükcan, M, Deri̇n, N, Çakınberk, A, Güven, M. (2012). A Study on the Adaptation of A Servant Leadership Scale For The Leaders in Local Politics, the Mayors. Journal of Academic ApproacHES, 3(2), 67-83.
  7. Eraslan, L. (2004). A post-modern paradigm in leadership: transformational leadership Journal Of Human Science,1(1), 1-32.
  8. Erdoğan, İ. (1991). Business Behavior, istanbul university business faculty Dönmezer, S. (1994). Sociology. Beta Publishing Distribution. Wadsworth, Walter J., (1999). Leadership Guide of the Attack Manager. (Translated by: E. Sabri Yarmalı), Istanbul: Hayat Publishing. Erdoğan, İ. (2004). School Management and Instructional Leadership. İstanbul: Sistem Publishing, 5th Edition.
  9. Bandura A. (1997) Self Efficacy: Theexercise of Control. New York: Freeman, 45-48.
  10. Gibbs, Colin, (2002). “Effective Teaching: Exercising Self-Efficacy and Thought Controlof Action”, at theAnnual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, England. Hoy, A. Woolfolk, Tschannen- Moran, M. K. Hoy, W. (1998), “Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning And Measure” Review of Educational Research, S: 68, No. 2, ss. 202-248,
  11. The Ohio State Universitesi Bıkmaz, H. F., (2006).
  12. Self-Efficacy Belief. Kuzgun, Y. &Deryakulu, D. (Ed.), Individual Differences in Education. Ankara: Nobel Publishing Distribution. Karasar, N. (2005). Scientific Research Method. Nobel Publishing Distribution. Ankara.
  13. Öcel H. (2002). Relationships Between Collective Competence, Self-Efficacy and Embarrassment and Perception and Expectations of Achievement in Tea