KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Dietary element assessment of legumes originated from Tunceli province using different dissolving techniques

Nagihan M. KARAASLAN
Sayfa
953–962
Yayın Tarihi
2017-09-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was observed that in chickpea and haricot bean samples Ca, Cu and Zn concentrations using microwave digestion method were higher than dry ashing method (p<0.01).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The objective of this study was to compare mineral contents of chickpeas and haricot bean using two different analytical digestion method including dry ashing and microwave digestion method.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The levels of micronutrient (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) and macronutrient minerals (Ca, Mg, Na, K) in two different legumes, as chickpea (Cicer arientinum L) and haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) samples that are widely growing and consumed in Tunceli Province-Turkey were evaluated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was observed that in chickpea and haricot bean samples Ca, Cu and Zn concentrations using microwave digestion method were higher than dry ashing method (p<0.01).
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Chickpea · Haricot bean · Mineral content

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare mineral contents of chickpeas and haricot bean using two different analytical digestion method including dry ashing and microwave digestion method. The levels of micronutrient (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) and macronutrient minerals (Ca, Mg, Na, K) in two different legumes, as chickpea (Cicer arientinum L) and haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) samples that are widely growing and consumed in Tunceli Province-Turkey were evaluated. The mineral composition of chickpea and haricot bean were determined by using FAAS after dissolving dry ashing and microwave digestion methods. In this way both the mineral composition of legume samples and the dissolving methods were compared. Results obtained from each group and each method was analyzed statistically using the SPSS statistic program. It was observed that in chickpea and haricot bean samples Ca, Cu and Zn concentrations using microwave digestion method were higher than dry ashing method (p<0.01).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARAASLAN, N. M. (2017). Dietary element assessment of legumes originated from Tunceli province using different dissolving techniques. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 953–962. https://ajindex.com/articles/781536

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Salgueiro MJ, Zubillaga MB, Lysionek AE, Caro RA, Eng RW, Boccio JR, The role of zinc in the growth and development of children. Nutrition. 2002;18:510-519.
  2. Untoro J, Karyadi E, Wibowo L, Erhardt J, Gross R. Multiple micronutrient supplements improve micronutrient status and anemia but not growth and morbidity of Indonesian infants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Journal of Nutrition. 2005;135:639S-645S. Melse-Boonstra A, De Pee S, Martini E, Halati S, Sari M, Kosen S, Muhilal Bloem MW, The potential of various foods to serve as a carrier for micronutrient fortification, data fromremote areas in Indonesia. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition-Nature. 2000;54:822-827.
  3. Chan SSL, Ferguson EL, Bailey K, Fahmida U, Harper TB, Gibson RS. The concentrations of iron, calcium, zinc and phytate in cereals and legumes habitually consumed by infants living in East Lombok, Indonesia. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2007;20, 609-617.
  4. Mamilla RK, Mishra VK. Effect of germination on antioxidant and ACE inhibitory activities of legumes. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2017;75:51-58. Singh U. Antinutritional factors of chickpea and pigeonpea and their removal by processing. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 1988;38:251-261.
  5. Chavan JK, Kadam SS, Salunkhe D. Chickpea. In: Salunkhe DK, Kadam SS (Eds.), CRC Handbook of World Food Legumes: Nutritional Chemistry, Processing Technology and Utilization CRC Press,
  6. Inc, Boca Raton, Florida, USA I. 1989;247-288.
  7. Christodoulou V, Bampidisa VA, Hucko B, Ploumi K, Iliadis C, Robinson PH, Mudrik Z. Nutritional value of chickpeas in rations of lactating ewes and growing lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2005;118:229-241.
  8. Akbaba U, Sahin Y, Urkez H. The element contents in chickpeas grown under organic and conventional farming regimes using WDXRF analysis for human nutrition and health, Turkish Journal of Physics. 2012;36:279-287.
  9. Shimelis EA, Rakshit SK. Antinutritional factors and in vitro protein digestibility of improved haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties grown in Ethiopia, International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2005;56:377-387.
  10. Costa GE, Queiroz-Monici K, Reis S, Oliveira AC. Chemical composition, dietary fiber and resistant starch contents of raw and cooked pea, common bean, chickpea and lentil legumes. Food Chemistry. 2006;94:327-330.
  11. Johnson SE, Lauren JG, Welch RM, Duxbury JM. A comparison of the effects of micronutrient seed priming and soil fertilization on th