Dergiler / Journal of Surgery and Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 12

YouTube as a source of information on the radiologic approach to COVID-19

Sayfa
1174–1178
Yayın Tarihi
2021-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The informative group (n=49) had a higher MICI score (MICI=8) when compared to the other groups (individual experience: 1 (n=3), news update: 1 (n=3), P

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aim: Since YouTube videos do not have accuracy filters, there are concerns about the information content.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:There are no studies specifically addressing the link between “Covid-19" and "radiology" in terms of content, reliability, and efficacy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The informative group (n=49) had a higher MICI score (MICI=8) when compared to the other groups (individual experience: 1 (n=3), news update: 1 (n=3), P
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:COVID-19 · Pandemic · Radiology

Abstract

Background/Aim: Since YouTube videos do not have accuracy filters, there are concerns about the information content. There are no studies specifically addressing the link between “Covid-19" and "radiology" in terms of content, reliability, and efficacy. The study aims to analyze videos posted on YouTube concerning Covid-19 and imaging in English. Methods: The parameters of 120 most viewed videos on YouTube were recorded with the search of keywords "Covid-19 radiology" and "Covid-19 imaging". Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information (DISCERN) and medical information and content index (MICI) scores were used to assess the reliability and medical content quality, respectively. The content was evaluated by types of radiological modalities and the patient groups included. Efficacy classification was conducted to assess "informative," "misleading," "individual experience" and "news update" groups. Video sources and target audience were analyzed. Results: After the exclusion criteria, 55 videos were examined. The informative group (n=49) had a higher MICI score (MICI=8) when compared to the other groups (individual experience: 1 (n=3), news update: 1 (n=3), P

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TEKİN, Z. N., ÖZEL, C. S. (2021). YouTube as a source of information on the radiologic approach to COVID-19. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 12, 1174–1178. https://ajindex.com/articles/779776

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:536-44. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z
  2. World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report (2020), https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update---29-december-2020; [accessed 29 December 2020]
  3. Tofighi S, Najafi S, Johnston SK, Gholamrezanezhad A. Low-dose CT in COVID-19 outbreak: radiation safety, image wisely, and image gently pledge. Emerg Radiol. 2020;27:601-5. doi: 10.1007/s10140-020-01784-3
  4. Long C, Xu H, Shen Q, Zhang X, Fan B, Wang C, et al. Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT? Eur J Radiol. 2020;126:108961. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108961
  5. Lemenager T, Neissner M, Koopmann A, Reinhard I, Georgiadou E, Müller A, et al. COVID-19 Lockdown Restrictions and Online Media Consumption in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:14
  6. Freeman B, Chapman S. Is "YouTube" telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website. Tob Control. 2007;16:207-10. doi:10.1136/tc.2007.020024
  7. Top 15 Most Popular Websites (ebizma website). 2020, http://www. ebizmba.com/articles/most‐popular‐websites; [accessed 15 May 2020]
  8. Basnet B, Bhattarai S, Khanal A, Upadhyay M, Baruwal A. Quality of YouTube patient information on prostate cancer screening. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2019;32:361-3. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1594493
  9. Khatri P, Singh SR, Belani NK, Yeong YL, Lohan R, Lim YW, et al. YouTube as source of information on 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak: a cross sectional study of English and Mandarin content. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;35:101636. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101636
  10. Nagpal SJ, Karimianpour A, Mukhija D, Mohan D, Brateanu A. YouTube videos as a source of medical information during the Ebola hemorrhagic fever epidemic. Springer plus. 2015;4:457. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1251-9
  11. Youtube Policies and Security. (Youtube Website), https://www. Youtube.com/about/policies/#community‐guidelines; [accessed 15 May 2020]
  12. Kocyigit BF, Akaltun MS, Sahin AR. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 and rheumatic disease link. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39:2049-54. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05176-3
  13. Sampson M, Cumber J, Li C, Pound CM, Fuller A, Harrison D. A systematic review of methods for studyi