Dergiler / E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Diffusion-weighted Imaging Versus Doppler Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Calf Deep Vein Thrombosis

Sayfa
57–63
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Restricted diffusion was defined significantly more often in patients with acute DVT (11/13 vs. 2/21, p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Doppler ultrasound (DUS) is the primary diagnostic tool used in lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, its accuracy may decrease in the calf-located DVT.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Restricted diffusion was defined significantly more often in patients with acute DVT (11/13 vs. 2/21, p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: Doppler ultrasound (DUS) is the primary diagnostic tool used in lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, its accuracy may decrease in the calf-located DVT. This study aims to examine the contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to the diagnosis of acute calf DVT (CDVT). Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of acute onset CDVT, referred to our department between January 1, 2018 and September 1, 2018, were recruited. Patients were initially evaluated with DUS. Same day magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [axial T1 and T2-weighted, gradient echo, diffusion, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences with 1.5 T MRI] were performed for comparison. The ADC value was measured independently by two radiologists. Second-look DUS was performed as a confirmatory diagnostic method for patients with incompatible MRI and initial DUS findings. Results: Thirty-four patients were recruited during the study period. Restricted diffusion was defined significantly more often in patients with acute DVT (11/13 vs. 2/21, p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TEKİN, Z. N., TÜRK, A., BİLGİ, Z., BARUTÇU, Ö. (2022). Diffusion-weighted Imaging Versus Doppler Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Calf Deep Vein Thrombosis. E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 57–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/498197

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Michiels JJ, Michiels JM, Moossdorff W, Lao M, Maasland H, Palareti G. Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, and prevention of deep vein thrombosis recurrence and the post-thrombotic syndrome in the primary care medicine setting anno 2014. World J Crit Care Med 2015;4:29-39.
  2. Bendick PJ, Glover JL, Holden RW, Dilley RS. Pitfalls of the Doppler examination for venous thrombosis. Am Surg 1983;49:320-3.
  3. Goodacre S, Sampson F, Thomas S, van Beek E, Sutton A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis. BMC Med Imaging 2005;5:6. Fraser DG, Moody AR, Morgan PS, Martel AL, Davidson I. Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:89- 98. Kelly J, Hunt BJ, Moody A. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging: a novel technique for imaging venous thromboemboli. Thromb Haemost 2003;89:773-82
  4. Tan M, Mol GC, van Rooden CJ, et al. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging differentiates acute recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis from residual thrombosis. Blood 2014;124:623-7.
  5. Dronkers CEA, Klok FA, van Langevelde K, et al. Diagnosing Recurrent DVT of the leg by two different non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging techniques: a pilot study. TH Open 2019;3:e37-e44. van Dam LF, Dronkers CEA, Gautam G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis. Blood 2020;135:1377-85.
  6. Duncan DP, Taddonio M, Chang EY, Huang BK. Characterization of intramuscular calf vein thrombosis on routine knee MRI. Skeletal Radiol 2019;48:1573-80.
  7. Kwee TC, Takahara T, Ochiai R, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2009;70:409-17.
  8. Spritzer CE, Arata MA, Freed KS. Isolated pelvic deep venous thrombosis: relative frequency as detected with mr imaging. Radiology 2001;219:521- 5. Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, Yasuda S, Nasu S, Van Cauteren M. Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiat Med 2004;22:275-82.
  9. Gi T, Kuroiwa Y, Yamashita A, et al. High signal intensity on diffusionweighted images reflects acute phase of deep vein thrombus. Thromb Haemost 2020;120:1463-73.
  10. Nakahashi M, Sato N, Tsushima Y, Amanuma M, Endo K. Diffusionweighted magnetic resonance imaging of the body in venous thrombosis: a