KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Relationship between SSN, F107 and Z component of EMF during the 24th Solar Cycle

Murat CANYILMAZ
Esat GUZEL
Emrah YALCIN
Sayfa
39–43
Yayın Tarihi
2021-08-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Low level of correlations with high significance were found between the variables.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The study inquires the statistical relationship between Solar activity indices SSN, F10.7 and Earth’s Magnetic Field (EMF) Z component which were measured in Iznik Magnetic Observatory, for the 24th Solar Cycle.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Pearson, Spearman and Kendall Tau-b correlation analysis were made according to the normality analysis of the values which was determined in accordance with skewness and kurtosis values.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Low level of correlations with high significance were found between the variables.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:SSN · F10.7 · Earth’s Magnetic Field

Abstract

The study inquires the statistical relationship between Solar activity indices SSN, F10.7 and Earth’s Magnetic Field (EMF) Z component which were measured in Iznik Magnetic Observatory, for the 24th Solar Cycle. Pearson, Spearman and Kendall Tau-b correlation analysis were made according to the normality analysis of the values which was determined in accordance with skewness and kurtosis values. Low level of correlations with high significance were found between the variables.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CANYILMAZ, M., GUZEL, E., YALCIN, E. (2021). Relationship between SSN, F107 and Z component of EMF during the 24th Solar Cycle. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 39–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/778294

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. J. J. Love, “Magnetic monitoring of earth and space,” Phys. Today, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 31–37, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1063/1.2883907
  2. O. Ozcan, S. Sağır and R. Atıcı “The Relationship between TEC and Earth's Magentic Field during Quiet and Disturbed days over Istanbul,Turkey” Advances in Space Research., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 2167–2171, 2020, doi: 10.16/j.asr.2020.01.35 [3] L. B. Liu, W. X. Wan, Y. D. Chen, and H. J. Le, “Solar activity effects of the ionosphere: A brief review,” Chinese Sci. Bull., vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 1202–1211, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-4226-9
  3. M. Mandea and A. Chambodut, “Geomagnetic Field Processes and Their Implications for Space Weather,” Surv. Geophys., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1611–1627, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10712-020-09598-1
  4. G. Hulot, T. J. Sabaka, N. Olsen, and A. Fournier, “The Present and Future Geomagnetic Field,” in Treatise on Geophysics, vol. 5, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 33–78
  5. C. C. Finlay, A. Jackson, N. Gillet, and N. Olsen, “Core surface magnetic field evolution 2000-2010,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 761–781, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05395.x
  6. U. R. Christensen, J. Aubert, and G. Hulot, “Conditions for Earth-like geodynamo models,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., vol. 296, no. 3–4, pp. 487–496, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.06.009
  7. V. Lesur, S. Macmillan, and A. Thomson, “A magnetic field model with daily variations of the magnetospheric field and its induced counterpart in 2001,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 79–88, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02479.x
  8. R. A. Langel, T. J. Sabaka, R. T. Baldwin, and J. A. Conrad, “The near-Earth magnetic field from magnetospheric and quiet-day ionospheric sources and how it is modeled,” Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., vol. 98, no. 3-4 SPEC. ISS., pp. 235–267, 1996, doi: 10.1016/s0031-9201(96)03190-1
  9. G. Hulot, C. C. Finlay, C. G. Constable, N. Olsen, and M. Mandea, “The magnetic field of planet earth,” Space Sci. Rev., vol. 152, no. 1–4, pp. 159–222, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11214-010-9644-0
  10. A. Conway, K. Macpherson, and J. Brown, “Predicting the maximum of solar cycle 23,” Astron. Geophys., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 222–224, 1998, doi: 10.1093/astrog/39.2.2.22
  11. M. O. F. Science, “Forecasting Solar Cycle 24 Using Neural Networks,” 2008
  12. P. Charbonneau, Dynamo models of the solar cycle, vol. 17, no
  13. Springer International Publishing, 2020
  14. David H. Hathaway, “The solar cycle,” Living Rev. Sol. Phys., vol. 12, no. 1, 2015,