SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Relationship between SSN, F107 and Z component of EMF during the 24th Solar Cycle

Murat CANYILMAZ
Esat GUZEL
Emrah YALCIN
Pages
39–43
Publication Date
2021-08-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Low level of correlations with high significance were found between the variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study inquires the statistical relationship between Solar activity indices SSN, F10.7 and Earth’s Magnetic Field (EMF) Z component which were measured in Iznik Magnetic Observatory, for the 24th Solar Cycle.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pearson, Spearman and Kendall Tau-b correlation analysis were made according to the normality analysis of the values which was determined in accordance with skewness and kurtosis values.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Low level of correlations with high significance were found between the variables.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:SSN · F10.7 · Earth’s Magnetic Field

Abstract

The study inquires the statistical relationship between Solar activity indices SSN, F10.7 and Earth’s Magnetic Field (EMF) Z component which were measured in Iznik Magnetic Observatory, for the 24th Solar Cycle. Pearson, Spearman and Kendall Tau-b correlation analysis were made according to the normality analysis of the values which was determined in accordance with skewness and kurtosis values. Low level of correlations with high significance were found between the variables.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANYILMAZ, M., GUZEL, E., YALCIN, E. (2021). Relationship between SSN, F107 and Z component of EMF during the 24th Solar Cycle. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 39–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/778294

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. J. J. Love, “Magnetic monitoring of earth and space,” Phys. Today, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 31–37, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1063/1.2883907
  2. O. Ozcan, S. Sağır and R. Atıcı “The Relationship between TEC and Earth's Magentic Field during Quiet and Disturbed days over Istanbul,Turkey” Advances in Space Research., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 2167–2171, 2020, doi: 10.16/j.asr.2020.01.35 [3] L. B. Liu, W. X. Wan, Y. D. Chen, and H. J. Le, “Solar activity effects of the ionosphere: A brief review,” Chinese Sci. Bull., vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 1202–1211, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-4226-9
  3. M. Mandea and A. Chambodut, “Geomagnetic Field Processes and Their Implications for Space Weather,” Surv. Geophys., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1611–1627, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10712-020-09598-1
  4. G. Hulot, T. J. Sabaka, N. Olsen, and A. Fournier, “The Present and Future Geomagnetic Field,” in Treatise on Geophysics, vol. 5, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 33–78
  5. C. C. Finlay, A. Jackson, N. Gillet, and N. Olsen, “Core surface magnetic field evolution 2000-2010,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 761–781, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05395.x
  6. U. R. Christensen, J. Aubert, and G. Hulot, “Conditions for Earth-like geodynamo models,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., vol. 296, no. 3–4, pp. 487–496, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.06.009
  7. V. Lesur, S. Macmillan, and A. Thomson, “A magnetic field model with daily variations of the magnetospheric field and its induced counterpart in 2001,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 79–88, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02479.x
  8. R. A. Langel, T. J. Sabaka, R. T. Baldwin, and J. A. Conrad, “The near-Earth magnetic field from magnetospheric and quiet-day ionospheric sources and how it is modeled,” Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., vol. 98, no. 3-4 SPEC. ISS., pp. 235–267, 1996, doi: 10.1016/s0031-9201(96)03190-1
  9. G. Hulot, C. C. Finlay, C. G. Constable, N. Olsen, and M. Mandea, “The magnetic field of planet earth,” Space Sci. Rev., vol. 152, no. 1–4, pp. 159–222, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11214-010-9644-0
  10. A. Conway, K. Macpherson, and J. Brown, “Predicting the maximum of solar cycle 23,” Astron. Geophys., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 222–224, 1998, doi: 10.1093/astrog/39.2.2.22
  11. M. O. F. Science, “Forecasting Solar Cycle 24 Using Neural Networks,” 2008
  12. P. Charbonneau, Dynamo models of the solar cycle, vol. 17, no
  13. Springer International Publishing, 2020
  14. David H. Hathaway, “The solar cycle,” Living Rev. Sol. Phys., vol. 12, no. 1, 2015,