KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Information Systems and Management Research / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Yazılım Süreç Geliştirme Modellerinin KOBİ’lerde Kabulü için Model Geliştirilmesi: Ön Bulgular

Suna DURMUŞ
Sevgi ÖZKAN YILDIRIM
Özden ÖZCAN TOP
Sayfa
51–60
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A pilot survey study was conducted to analyze the model with 20 participants who work in a CMMI Level 3 company.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The software industry is playing a significant role in development of economies all over the world.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:These companies aim to benefit from Software Process Improvements (SPI) to increase product quality and productivity in a competitive environment.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A pilot survey study was conducted to analyze the model with 20 participants who work in a CMMI Level 3 company.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Software Process Improvement · Technology Acceptance Model · Small and Medium Enterprise

Özet

The software industry is playing a significant role in development of economies all over the world. It is mainly made up of small and medium software enterprises (SMEs). These companies aim to benefit from Software Process Improvements (SPI) to increase product quality and productivity in a competitive environment. Several SPI models and frameworks have been developed to improve software quality in SMEs. As SPI require organizational change and adaptation to new tools, techniques and work practices; organizations have to handle with several challenges emerged from the change. In this study, we present the factors that influence the success and adoption of the SPI models and/or standards used in SMEs. We also present the preliminary findings of the SPI acceptance model that we developed based on an established behavioral theory for SMEs. A pilot survey study was conducted to analyze the model with 20 participants who work in a CMMI Level 3 company.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DURMUŞ, S., YILDIRIM, S. Ö., TOP, Ö. Ö. (2021). Yazılım Süreç Geliştirme Modellerinin KOBİ’lerde Kabulü için Model Geliştirilmesi: Ön Bulgular. Journal of Information Systems and Management Research, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 51–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/777209

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Systems characteristics, user perceptions and behaviroal impacts,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475-487. doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1022 M. Zarour, A. Abran and J. M. Desharnais, “Software Process Improvement for Small and Very Small Enterprises,” In Software Process Improvement and Management: Approaches and Tools for Practical Development (pp. 183-204).
  2. IGI Global. “CMMI® Development Version 1.3,” cmmiinstitute.com, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://cmmiinstitute.com/cmmi. [Accessed: Sept, 20, 2019]. “International Organization for Standardization”, iso.org, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standards.html. [Accessed: Sept, 20, 2019].
  3. A. R. C. da Rocha, M. Montoni, K. C. Weberand E. E. R. de Araujo, E. E. R, “A nationwide program for software process improvement in Brazil,” In Quality of Information and Communications Technology, 2007. QUATIC 2007. 6th International Conference on the (pp. 167-176).
  4. IEEE M. Habib, S. Ahmed, A. Rehmat, M. J. Khan and S. Shamail, “Blending six sigma and CMMI-an approach to accelerate process improvement in SMEs,” In Multitopic Conference, INMIC 2008, IEEE International (pp. 386-391).
  5. S. Kar, S. Das, A. K. Rath and S. K. Kar, “Self-assessment model and review technique for SPICE: SMART SPICE,” In International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (pp. 222-232).
  6. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. T. J. Bilan and S. A. McCord, “A process improvement framework for information technology management in small to medium enterprises (PI4IT),” in Proceedings of the Conference for Information Systems Applied Research ISSN (Vol. 2167, p. 1508). M. Khalifa and J. M. Verner, “Drivers for software development method usage,” IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 47(3), 360-369. I. Azjen, “The theory of planned behavior: Some unresolved issues,” Organize Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, pp. 179–211, 1991. C. H. Triandis, “Values, attitudes and interpersonal behavior,” presented at the Nebraska Symp. Motivation, 1979:
  7. Beliefs, Attitudes and Values, Lincoln, NE, 1980, pp. 159–295.
  8. S. Bibi, V. C. Gerogiannis, G. Kakarontzas and I. Stamelos, “Ontology based bayesian software process improvenent” In Software Engineering and Applications (ICSOFT-EA), 2014 9th International Conference on (pp. 568-575).
  9. IEEE. D. Chevers, A. M. Mills, E. Duggan and S. Moore, “An evaluation of software development practices amo