Dergiler / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 6

Single-center experience of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma treated without radiotherapy

Sayfa
853–857
Yayın Tarihi
2021-09-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Acceptable good results obtained without radiotherapy are satisfactory and the chance of curative success will increase with the addition of new target agents to the treatment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) constitutes 40% of childhood lymphomas and approximately 6% of all childhood cancers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and Method: The patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Pediatrics Hematology-Oncology Center at Erciyes University between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in the study and the data of the patients were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Acceptable good results obtained without radiotherapy are satisfactory and the chance of curative success will increase with the addition of new target agents to the treatment.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Hodgkin lymphoma · children · radiotherapy

Abstract

Aim: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) constitutes 40% of childhood lymphomas and approximately 6% of all childhood cancers. It is tried to achieve cure with combined treatment modalities consisting of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, and new treatment agents such as nivolumab. Radiotherapy-related infertility, secondary cancer, thyroid dysfunction, cardiovascular diseases, pulmonary fibrosis, and local skin reactions can be seen in the pediatric age group with a long life expectancy. In this article, pediatric patients diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma without the use of radiotherapy in the treatment were evaluated retrospectively and the survival results were reported as a single-center experience. Material and Method: The patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Pediatrics Hematology-Oncology Center at Erciyes University between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in the study and the data of the patients were evaluated retrospectively. Results: In 68 pediatric patients with a mean age of 10.7 (±4.6) years, the male/female ratio was 1.3. The most detected finding at the time of diagnosis was cervical lymphadenopathy (83.8%). The most common mixed cellular subtype was identified (48.5%). Stage I-II disease was observed in 38.3% of the patients, and stage III-IV disease was observed in 61.7% of the patients. The median follow-up period of the patients was 61 (range, 8.3-161.6) months. Disease-free survival and overall survival were 85.3% and 94.1%, respectively. Treatment modalities to be used in this disease group, which has a high chance of cure after cytotoxic treatment, should be selected considering treatment-related long-term complications. Conclusion: Acceptable good results obtained without radiotherapy are satisfactory and the chance of curative success will increase with the addition of new target agents to the treatment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, E., ARSLAN, M., AKYOL, Ş., ÖZCAN, A., ZARARSIZ, G., ABDULREZZAK, Ü., KONTAŞ, O., CANÖZ, Ö., ÜNAL, E., KARAKÜKÇÜ, M. (2021). Single-center experience of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma treated without radiotherapy. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 6, 853–857. https://ajindex.com/articles/776738

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Zupanec S. Lymphoma. In: Tomlinson D, Kline NE, eds. Pediatric Oncology Nursing. Advanced Clinical Handbook. New York: Springer; 2010: 33–57. Friedman D. Hodgkin Lymphoma. In: Lanzkowsky P, Lipton JM, Fish JD. Lanzkowsky's manual of pediatric hematology and oncology: Academic Press; 2016: 429-41.
  2. Ashraf MS, Naz F, Yakoob MY. Characteristics and survival outcomes of children with Hodgkin lymphoma treated primarily with chemotherapy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2019; 41: 452-6.
  3. Cuccaro A, Bartolomei F, Cupelli E, Galli E, Giachelia M, Hohaus S. Prognostic factors in hodgkin lymphoma. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2014; 6: e2014053. Dores GM, Metayer C, Curtis RE, et al. Second malignant neoplasms among long-term survivors of Hodgkin's disease: a population-based evaluation over 25 years. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3484-94.
  4. Hancock SL, Donaldson SS, Hoppe RT. Cardiac disease following treatment of Hodgkin's disease in children and adolescents. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 1208-15.
  5. Hancock SL, Cox RS, McDougall IR. Thyroid diseases after treatment of Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 599-605.
  6. Patiroglu T, Haluk Akar H, Gilmour K, et al. A case of XMEN syndrome presented with severe auto-immune disorders mimicking autoimmune lymphoproliferative disease. Clin Immunol 2015; 159: 58-62.
  7. Somekh I, Marquardt B, Liu Y, et al. Novel mutations in RASGRP1 are associated with immunodeficiency, immune dysregulation, and EBV-induced lymphoma. J Clin Immunol 2018; 38: 699-710.
  8. Cansever M, Zietara N, Chiang SCC, et al. A rare case of activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta syndrome (APDS) presenting with hemophagocytosis complicated with hodgkin lymphoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2020; 42: 156-9.
  9. Trehan A, Singla S, Marwaha RK, Bansal D, Srinivasan R. Hodgkin lymphoma in children: experience in a tertiary care centre in India. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2013; 35: 174-9.
  10. Sherief LM, Elsafy UR, Abdelkhalek ER, et al. Hodgkin lymphoma in childhood: clinicopathological features and therapy outcome at 2 centers from a developing country. Medicine 2015; 94: 15. Stoneham S, Ashley S, Pinkerton R, Hewitt M, Wallace W, Shankar AJEJoC. Hodgkin’s lymphoma in children aged 5 years or less–The United Kingdom experience. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43: 1415-21.
  11. Hsu SC, Metzger ML, Hudson MM, et al. Comparison of treatment outcomes of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma in two US centers and a center in Recife, Brazil. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007; 49: 139-44.
  12. Faizan M, Taj MM, Anwar S, et al. Comparison of presentat