KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Are scoring systems detecting acute appendicitis reliable? a prospective clinical study

Mustafa Taner BOSTANCI
İbrahim YILMAZ
Sanem CİMEN
Koray KOŞMAZ
Aysun GÖKCE
Mehmet Alperen AVCI
Sayfa
167–172
Yayın Tarihi
2022-01-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

After the admission and deciding the operation via experienced general surgeon, the probability of acute appendicitis was calculated using via 6 different scoring systems: Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohmann, Lintula, RIPASA, Fenyo, respectively, and results were analyzed statistically. p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is still challenging.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Negative appendectomy rate is reported as 20-30%.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:After the admission and deciding the operation via experienced general surgeon, the probability of acute appendicitis was calculated using via 6 different scoring systems: Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohmann, Lintula, RIPASA, Fenyo, respectively, and results were analyzed statistically. p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Acute Appendicitis · Scoring Systems · Appendectomy

Abstract

Aim: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is still challenging. Negative appendectomy rate is reported as 20-30%. Therefore, various scoring systems have been developed to prevent unnecessary appendectomies. The aim of our study is to analyze the diagnostic value of different scoring systems in acute appendicitis. Material and Method: The study conducted with 200 consecutive patients who were operated with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. After the admission and deciding the operation via experienced general surgeon, the probability of acute appendicitis was calculated using via 6 different scoring systems: Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohmann, Lintula, RIPASA, Fenyo, respectively, and results were analyzed statistically. p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOSTANCI, M. T., YILMAZ, İ., CİMEN, S., KOŞMAZ, K., GÖKCE, A., AVCI, M. A. (2022). Are scoring systems detecting acute appendicitis reliable? a prospective clinical study. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 167–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/776666

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Rathod S, Ali I, Bawa AP, Singh G, Mishra S, Nongmaithem M. Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 2010; 51: 220–5. Horzić M, Salamon A, Kopljar M, Skupnjak M, Cupurdija K, Vanjak D. Analysis of scores in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women.Coll Antropol 2005; 1: 133-8.
  2. Escriba A, Gamell AM, Fernandez Y, Quintilla JM, Cubells CL. Prospective validation of two systems of classification for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011; 27: 165-9. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15: 557-64.
  3. Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. A computer based diagnostic score to aid in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain. Theor Surg 1992; 7: 86-90.
  4. Ohmann C, Yang Q, Franke C. Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study Group. Eur J Surg 1995; 161: 273-81.
  5. Lintula H, Kokki H, Pulkkinen J, Kettunen R, Gröhn O, Eskelinen M. Diagnostic score in acute appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Lintula score) for adults with suspected appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395: 495-500.
  6. Chong CF, Adi MI, Thien A, et al.Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 2010; 51: 220-5.
  7. Fenyo G, Lindberg G, Blind P, Enochsson L, Oberg A. Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of a simplified scoring system. Eur J Surg 1997; 163: 831–8.
  8. Sitter H, Hoffmann S, Hassan I, Zielke A. Diagnostic score in appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Eskelinen score) in patients in whom acute appendicitis is suspected. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004; 389: 213-8.
  9. Toorenvliet BR, Wiersma F, Bakker RF, Merkus JW, Breslau PJ, Hamming JF. Routine ultrasound and limited computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Surg 2010; 34: 2278–85.
  10. Erdem H, Çetinkünar S, Daş K, et al. Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohhmann and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scores for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 9057-62.
  11. Pinto F, Pinto A, Russo A, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adult patients: review of the literature. Crit Ultrasound J 2013; 5: 1-3.
  12. Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ. Systematic review: Computed tomography and ultrasonography to detec