KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Technology-Supported Inquiry-Based Learning in Science Education: Action Research

Zeynep KOYUNLU ÜNLÜ
İlbilge DÖKME
Sayfa
120–133
Yayın Tarihi
2020-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is hoped that the results of this research will offer insights for researchers and practitioners.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The general aim of this action research was to offer ways of making science and technology education more effective and solving problems in the related field.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Taking into consideration the literature and the interest areas of the researchers, the inquiry-based 5E instructional model was embedded in a new framework of 4W questions (“What will I learn?”, “Why will I learn?”, “With what will I learn?”, and “What have I learned?”) and supported by instructional technologies involving specific stages with standard applications for solving problems.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is hoped that the results of this research will offer insights for researchers and practitioners.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:action research · inquiry based learning · science education

Abstract

The general aim of this action research was to offer ways of making science and technology education more effective and solving problems in the related field. The specific purpose was to determine how inquiry-based learning supported by instructional technologies improves students’ achievement and develops their scientific inquiry skills. Taking into consideration the literature and the interest areas of the researchers, the inquiry-based 5E instructional model was embedded in a new framework of 4W questions (“What will I learn?”, “Why will I learn?”, “With what will I learn?”, and “What have I learned?”) and supported by instructional technologies involving specific stages with standard applications for solving problems. The implementation was carried out at the seventh-grade level in a Turkish middle school in a semester. The participants were a researcher-teacher and six students (two girls, four boys). According to the results, the students’ science achievement and scientific process skills developed. This implementation effectively addressed students’ affective learning areas, such as their attitudes, motivation, sense of responsibility, and values in relation to the learning environment. It is hoped that the results of this research will offer insights for researchers and practitioners.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÜNLÜ, Z. K., DÖKME, İ. (2020). The Effect of Technology-Supported Inquiry-Based Learning in Science Education: Action Research. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 120–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/775916

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Acar Sesen, B., & Tarhan, L. (2013). Inquiry-based laboratory activities in electrochemistry: high school students’ achievements and attitudes. Research in Science Education 43, 413-435.
  2. Ateş, S. (2004). Araştırma yoluyla öğretim metodunun farklı zihinsel gelişim dönemlerindeki sınıf öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilimsel işlem becerilerinin gelişimlerine etkileri. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 275-290.
  3. Ayas, A. P., Çepni, S., Akdeniz, A. R., Özmen, H., Yiğit, N., & Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2005). Kuramdan uygulamaya fen ve teknoloji öğretimi. Ankara:
  4. Pegem A.Bakır, K. (2006). Pragmatizm ve eğitime yansımaları. KKEFD, 14, 49-68.
  5. Bell, L., Gess-Newsome, J., & Luft, C. (2008). Technology in the secondary science classroom. United States of America: NSTA Press.
  6. Bell, R. L., Maeng, J. L., & Binns, I. C. (2013). Learning in context: technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 348-379.
  7. Bellflower, J. V. (2011). The effectiveness of traditional and 21st century teaching tools on students’ science learning. Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University, Minneapolis. Beishuizen, J., Wilhelm, P., & Schimmel, M. (2004). Computer-supported inquiry learning: effects of training and practice. Computers & Education, 42(4), 389-402.
  8. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Bybee, R. W. (2002). Learning science and the science of learning: science educators' essay collection. National Science Teachers Association. Cabe Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., Christopher, J. E., & Sackes, M. (2010). The effect of guided inquiry based instruction on middle school students’ understanding of lunar concepts. Research in Science Education, 40, 451-478.
  9. Cheung, D. (2011). Teacher beliefs about implementing guided-inquiry laboratory experiments for secondary school chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 1462-1468.
  10. Chinn, C. A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2002). Authentic inquiry: introduction to the special section. Science Education, 86(2), 171-174.
  11. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic reasoning in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
  12. Dede, Y. & Yaman, S. (2008). Fen öğrenmeye yönelik motivasyon ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 2(1), 19-3