KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Design Studio / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Insight into a Personalized Procedure of Design in Concept Generation by the Students in Architecture Thesis Projects

Rahman TAFAHOMİ
Sayfa
5–18
Yayın Tarihi
2021-07-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, the results revealed that the students adopted a personal procedure under the influences of the supervisors to design a concept that is closely aligned with a subjective approach, rather than a structured research process.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper analyses the predominant trend between the students to follow, frame, and develop a concept in the architectural thesis design.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The research targets to question how the students derive their inspiration from diverse sources and influencers into the architectural design concept.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, the results revealed that the students adopted a personal procedure under the influences of the supervisors to design a concept that is closely aligned with a subjective approach, rather than a structured research process.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Concept Generation · Personal Procedure · Research Process

Abstract

This paper analyses the predominant trend between the students to follow, frame, and develop a concept in the architectural thesis design. The research targets to question how the students derive their inspiration from diverse sources and influencers into the architectural design concept. The research methodology was based on semi-structured questionnaires with Likert scale questions to analyse and interpret data through the Chi-Square test in SPSS software. The findings revealed that first, the students preferred to employ more symbolic and poetic elements for the design than real projects, second, to create their concepts under influences of supervisors and juries than research, third, to follow personal procedure than the structured process of the course. In conclusion, the results revealed that the students adopted a personal procedure under the influences of the supervisors to design a concept that is closely aligned with a subjective approach, rather than a structured research process.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAFAHOMİ, R. (2021). Insight into a Personalized Procedure of Design in Concept Generation by the Students in Architecture Thesis Projects. Journal of Design Studio, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 5–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/775841

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Alerby, E. (2000). A Way of Visualising Children’s and Young People’s Thoughts about the Environment: a study of drawings. Environmental Education Research, 6(3), 205-222.
  2. Anderson, N. M. (2014). Public Interest Design as Praxis. Journal of Architectural Education, 68(1),16-27. doi:10.1080/10464883.2014.864896 Bakare, T. V. (2012). Effect of seating arrangement on methodology in adult education classes in Lagos, Nigeria: implication for knowledge creation and capacity building. Journal of Educational Review, 5(3), 307-314.
  3. Borden, I., & Ray, K. R. (2006). The Dissertation: An Architecture Student’s Handbook. (Second, Ed.) New York: Architectural Press,
  4. Elsevier. Carey, S. (2000). The Origin of Concepts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 37-41.
  5. Ching, F. D. (1996).
  6. Architecture, Form, Space, Order. New York: Architectural Press.
  7. Ching, F. D. (2015). Architectural Graphic (6 ed.). New York: Willy. Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E.-H. (2014). Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences. The Qualitative Report 2014 Volume 19, Article 64, 1-20, 64, 1-20.
  8. Cikis, S., & Ek, F. I. (2010). Conceptualization by Visual and Verbal Representations: An Experience in an Architectural Design Studio. The Design Journal, 13(3), 329–354. doi:10.2752/146069210X12766130824975 Crowe, N., & Laseau, P. (2011). Visual Notes for Architects and Designers (2 ed.). New York: John & Sons Publisher. D’Souza, N. (2007). Design Intelligences: A Case for Multiple Intelligences in Architectural Design. International Journal of Architectural Research, 1(2), 15-43.
  9. De Campos, C. I., Pitombo, C. S., Delhomme, P., & Quintanilha, J. A. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Data Reduction Techniques for Questionnaire Validation Using Self- reported Driver Behaviors. Journal of Safety Research, 73, 133-142.
  10. DoF. (2014). Architecture Program Specification. Kigali: the University of Rwanda. Dutton, T. A. (1991). Voices in architectural education: Cultural politics and pedagogy. New York, London: Bergin and Garvey. Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 2(1), 1-10.
  11. Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. Sydney: Allen & Unwin. Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Nachmias, D., & DeWaard, J. (2014). Research Methods in the Social Sciences (8 ed.). New York: SAGE Publisher Ink. Frayling, C. (1993). Research in Art and Design. Ro