Dergiler / Journal of Design Studio / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Developing a Design Framework to Methodize the Architecture Thesis Projects with Emphasis on Programming and Conceptualization Processes

Sayfa
139–161
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The application of a design framework could create a logical process for the students to develop the thesis project based on systematic inquiries, activities, and outputs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research advocates a design framework as an analytical tool for programming-conceptualization in architecture education in design studios.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The architecture thesis students apply for programs and conceptual design in different ways a significant part of them prefer to use precedent projects.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The application of a design framework could create a logical process for the students to develop the thesis project based on systematic inquiries, activities, and outputs.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Architecture · Studio · Thesis

Abstract

This research advocates a design framework as an analytical tool for programming-conceptualization in architecture education in design studios. The architecture thesis students apply for programs and conceptual design in different ways a significant part of them prefer to use precedent projects. Although architecture thesis projects are contracted on the studies, methods, and analysis, the relationships between the programming-conceptualization and the rest of the thesis project were observed so weakly. To cover this gap a design framework was designed to link the architecture findings and the design objective and strategies. The methodology of the research was designed based on the qualitative method with the application of structured observation, content and graphical analysis. The data of the research was combined from the drawing boards of the thesis students in the final exam. The findings of the research identified that the design framework links the architecture problem to the architectural design decision for the appropriate programming and conceptualization. However, the students apply the design framework in different ways to adapt it to their own personal understanding of programming-conceptualization. In conclusion, the design framework is a tool to use in design studios to create alternatives for the programming-conceptualization activities by the students. The application of a design framework could create a logical process for the students to develop the thesis project based on systematic inquiries, activities, and outputs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAFAHOMİ, R. (2022). Developing a Design Framework to Methodize the Architecture Thesis Projects with Emphasis on Programming and Conceptualization Processes. Journal of Design Studio, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 139–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/869194

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. AIA, A. (2009). AIA Document B202™–2009. New York: AIA. Bakel, V. A. (1995). Styles of architectural designing: empirical research on working styles and personality dispositions. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. doi:10.6100/IR437596 Bonnes, M., & Bonaiuto, M. (2002). Environmental psychology: From spatial-physical environment to sustainable development. In R. B. Bechtel, & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environment psychology (pp. 28-54). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Boradkar, P. (2010). Design as problem solving. In R. Frodeman, The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinary (pp. 273–287).
  2. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  3. Borden, I., & Ray, K. R. (2006). The dissertation: An architecture student’s handbook. (Second, Ed.) New York: Architectural Press,
  4. Elsevier. Ching, F. D. (2010). Design drawing (2th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Ching, F. D. (2015). Architectural graphic (6 ed.). New York: Willy. Cross, N. (2005). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Crowe, N., & Laseau, P. (2011). Visual notes for architects and designers (2 ed.). Wiley. DoA. (2012). Architecture program specification. Kigali: Department of Architecture, The University of Rwanda. Dorst, K. (2006). Design Problems and Design Paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4-17. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25224059
  5. Draper, J. (1977). The Ecole des Beaux-Arts and the architectural profession in the United States: The case of John Galen Howard. In S. Kostof, The architect (pp. 209–238). New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Drexler, A. (1975). The architecture of the Ecole des Beaux Arts. New York: The Museum of Modern Art. Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Duerk, D. P. (1993). Architectural programming: Information management for design. New York: Wiley. FAED, F. (2009). Program specification of architecture. Kigali: The University of Rwanda. Franz, J. M. (1994). A critical framework for methodological research in architecture. Design Studies, 15(4), 433-447.
  8. Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Paper, 1(1), 1-5.
  9. Garric, J.‐P. (2017). The French Beaux‐Arts. In M. Bressani, & C. Contandriopoulos, The companions to the history of architecture, volume III, nineteenth century architecture, part I: Historicism, the Beaux‐Arts, and the Gothic (pp. 1-15). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Ghonim, M., & Eweda, N. (2019)