KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Sport Culture and Science / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on Leg Press One Repetition Maximum Performance

Fırat AKÇA
Ersan ARSLAN
Dicle ARAS
Sayfa
140–149
Yayın Tarihi
2018-06-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, the results of the present study are important for both practical and research environments.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In order to investigate the effects of different warm-up protocols on one repetition maximum (1RM) leg press performance, 23 rowers (age 21.48±3.12 years, height 185.17±8.22 cm, body mass 83.86 ±8.7 kg.) completed 1RM leg press tests after four different general warmup conditions with a standardized specific warm-up.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The duration of the protocols were fixed as 15 minutes (min.) for each participant, but there were differences in the intensity of the warm-up.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, the results of the present study are important for both practical and research environments.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:strength · performance · ergometer

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of different warm-up protocols on one repetition maximum (1RM) leg press performance, 23 rowers (age 21.48±3.12 years, height 185.17±8.22 cm, body mass 83.86 ±8.7 kg.) completed 1RM leg press tests after four different general warmup conditions with a standardized specific warm-up. The workloads of the warm-up protocols were individually designed according to the results of the incremental maximal rowing ergometer test that applied initially. The duration of the protocols were fixed as 15 minutes (min.) for each participant, but there were differences in the intensity of the warm-up. In statistical analysis, warm-up conditions were set as fixed factor while participants as a random factor. Tukey post hoc test was employed whenever a significant difference was found. A probability level of 0.05 was established to determine statistical significance. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPPS version 20. As a conclusion, approximately 4% higher 1 RM results were obtained after low intensity (40% of VO2Max) protocols which contain two intermittent sprints that last 15 seconds in the last 5 min. of the protocol. Thus, the results of the present study are important for both practical and research environments.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKÇA, F., ARSLAN, E., ARAS, D. (2018). Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on Leg Press One Repetition Maximum Performance. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 140–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/768885

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Akca F (2014). Prediction of rowing ergometer performance from functional anaerobic power, strength and anthropometric components. J Hum Kinet 41(1):133-142.
  2. Akca F, Muniroglu S (2008). Anthropometric-somatotype and strength profiles and on-water performance in Turkish elite kayakers. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences 20:22-34.
  3. Bacurau RF, Monteiro GA, Ugrinowitsch C, Tricoli V, Cabral LF, Aoki MS (2009). Acute effect of a ballistic and a static stretching exercise bout on flexibility and maximal strength. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 23(1):304-308.
  4. Baechle TR, Earle RW (2008). Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics-National Strength & Conditioning Association (U.S.). xiv, 641 p. p. Barroso R, Silva-Batista C, Tricoli V, Roschel H, Ugrinowitsch C (2013). The effects of different intensities and durations of the general warm-up on leg press 1RM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 27(4):1009-1013. Bishop D (2003a). Warm up I - Potential mechanisms and the effects of passive warm up on exercise performance. Sports Medicine 33(6):439-454. Bishop D (2003b). Warm up II - Performance changes to structure the warm following active warm up and how up. Sports Medicine 33(7):483-498.
  5. Bishop D, Bonetti D, Spencer M (2003). The effect of an intermittent, high-intensity warm-up on supramaximal kayak ergometer performance. Journal of Sports Sciences 21(1):13-20.
  6. Borg GA (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 14(5):377-381.
  7. Brown LE, Weir JP (2001). ASEP procedures recommendation I: Accurate assessment of muscular strength and power. JEP Online 4:1-21.
  8. Chun-Jung H, Nesser TW, Edwards JE (2007). Strength and Power Determinants of Rowing Performance. JEP Online 10(4):43-50.
  9. Costa PB, Herda TJ, Herda AA, Cramer JT (2014). Effects of dynamic stretching on strength, muscle imbalance, and muscle activation. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 46(3):586-593.
  10. Garcia-Pallares J, Garcia-Fernandez M, Sanchez-Medina L, Izquierdo M (2010). Performance changes in world-class kayakers following two different training periodization models. European Journal of Applied Physiology 110(1):99-107. García-Pallarés J, Sánchez-Medina L, Carrasco L, Díaz A, Izquierdo M (2009). Endurance and neuromuscular changes in world-class level kayakers during a periodized training cycle. European Journal of Applied Physiology 106(4):629-638.
  11. Gee TI, Olsen PD, B