Dergiler / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4/AC nanoparticles and its application for the removal of gas-phase toluene by adsorption process

Sayfa
146–155
Yayın Tarihi
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study indicated that magnetic Fe3O4/AC could be applied as an adsorbent for the removal of gas-phase toluene.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, we present the first application of magnetic Fe3O4 functionalized with activated carbon (Fe3O4/AC) as nano-adsorbent for the removal of gas-phase toluene by adsorption process.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Magnetic Fe3O4/AC was synthesized via co-precipitation method within the framework of nanotechnology principles.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study indicated that magnetic Fe3O4/AC could be applied as an adsorbent for the removal of gas-phase toluene.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Nanotechnology · magnetic nano-adsorbents · response surface methodology

Abstract

In this study, we present the first application of magnetic Fe3O4 functionalized with activated carbon (Fe3O4/AC) as nano-adsorbent for the removal of gas-phase toluene by adsorption process. Magnetic Fe3O4/AC was synthesized via co-precipitation method within the framework of nanotechnology principles. Then, the effects of process conditions such as contact time, initial toluene concentration, and temperature on the adsorption capacity of toluene by the magnetic Fe3O4/AC were investigated using the response surface methodology (RSM). The obtained magnetic Fe3O4/AC was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and thermogravimetric (TG) analysis. The maximum adsorption capacity of the magnetic Fe3O4/AC for the adsorption of the toluene was determined as 312.99 mg g-1 under optimal process conditions such as 59.48 min contact time, 17.21 mg l-1 initial toluene concentration, and 26.01°C temperature. The adsorption by the magnetic Fe3O4/AC indicated the best fit with the Langmuir isotherm model, and obeyed the pseudo-second-order (PSO) kinetic model. This study indicated that magnetic Fe3O4/AC could be applied as an adsorbent for the removal of gas-phase toluene.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KUTLUAY, S., ECE, M. Ş., ŞAHİN, Ö. (2020). Synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4/AC nanoparticles and its application for the removal of gas-phase toluene by adsorption process. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 146–155. https://ajindex.com/articles/765669

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (21)

  1. Kumar, M.; Giri, B. S.; Kim, K.-H.; Singh, R. P.; Rene, E. R.; López, M. E.; Rai, B. N.; Singh, H.; Prasad, D.; Singh, R. S. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 285, 121317
  2. Kutluay, S.; Baytar, O.; Şahin, Ö. Res. Eng. Struct. Mater. 2019, 5 (3), 279-298
  3. Ryu, H. W.; Song, M. Y.; Park, J. S.; Kim, J. M.; Jung, S. C.; Song, J.; Kim, B. J.; Park, Y. K. Environ. Res. 2019, 172, 649-657
  4. Xu, P.; Wei, Y.; Cheng, N.; Li, S.; Li, W.; Guo, T.; Wang, X. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 366, 105-113
  5. Temel, F.; Kutluay, S. New J. Chem. 2020, 44 (30), 12949-12961
  6. Temel, F.; Tabakci, M. Talanta 2016, 153, 221-227
  7. Şahin, Ö.; Saka, C.; Kutluay, S. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2013, 19 (5), 1617-1623
  8. Saka, C.; Şahin, Ö.; Kutluay, S. Energ. Source. Part A 2016, 38 (3), 339-346
  9. Tor, A.; Aydin, M. E.; Aydin, S.; Tabakci, M.; Beduk, F. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 656-663
  10. Connie, Z. Y.; Ariya, P. A. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2015, 31, 164-174
  11. Bhatia, D.; Datta, D.; Joshi, A.; Gupta, S.; Gote, Y. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 63 (2), 436-445
  12. Kutluay, S.; Baytar, O.; Şahin, Ö. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7 (2), 102947
  13. Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; Yang, Y.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Li, Z. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 259, 79-89
  14. Juang, R. S.; Yei, Y. C.; Liao, C. S.; Lin, K. S.; Lu, H. C.; Wang, S. F.; Sun, A. C. J. Taiwan. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2018, 90, 51-60
  15. Kutluay, S.; Baytar, O.; Şahin, Ö.; Arran, A. Eur. J. Tech. 2020, 10 (1), 131-142
  16. Baytar, O.; Şahin, Ö.; Horoz, S.; Kutluay, S. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 26191–26210
  17. Vohra, M. S. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2015, 40 (11), 3007-3017
  18. Ali, R. M.; Hamad, H. A.; Hussein, M. M.; Malash, G. F. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 91, 317-332
  19. Dada, A.; Olalekan, A.; Olatunya, A.; Dada, O. IOSR J. Appl. Chem. 2012, 3 (1), 38-45
  20. Hu, Q.; Zhang, Z. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 277, 646-648
  21. Sadeghalvad, B.; Azadmehr, A.; Hezarkhani, A. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (72), 67630-67642.