Dergiler / International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

Photosynthetic performance responses in different phyiological development stages of some Brassica juncea genotypes in field condition

Sayfa
400–405
Yayın Tarihi
2020-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance were associated with seed yield in B. juncea genotypes and the selection of genotypes with high gas exchange may provide development of mustard (B. juncea) genotypes with high yield.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study Brassica juncea genotypes were planted as fall sowing at the experimental fields located at Yenimahalle-Ankara location based on randomized block design.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In order to investigate photosynthetic performances of three B. juncea genotypes; net photosynthetic rate = PN [μmol(CO2) m-2s-1], transpiration = E (mmol m-2s-1), stomatal conductance = gs (mmol m-2s-1), intercellular/ambient CO2 air= Ci [μmol (CO2) mol-1(hava)], mesophyll conductance= gm [mmol(CO2)/m2s1] and photosynthetic water use efficiency = PWUE [μmol(CO2)/mol(H2O)] parameters (model LCi Photosynthesis System, ADC Bioscientific Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK) were measured and phenological aspects were recorded at different physiological stages as booting, anthesis and grain filling during experiment.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance were associated with seed yield in B. juncea genotypes and the selection of genotypes with high gas exchange may provide development of mustard (B. juncea) genotypes with high yield.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Brassica juncea · Gas exchange · Stomatal conductance

Abstract

In this study Brassica juncea genotypes were planted as fall sowing at the experimental fields located at Yenimahalle-Ankara location based on randomized block design. In order to investigate photosynthetic performances of three B. juncea genotypes; net photosynthetic rate = PN [μmol(CO2) m-2s-1], transpiration = E (mmol m-2s-1), stomatal conductance = gs (mmol m-2s-1), intercellular/ambient CO2 air= Ci [μmol (CO2) mol-1(hava)], mesophyll conductance= gm [mmol(CO2)/m2s1] and photosynthetic water use efficiency = PWUE [μmol(CO2)/mol(H2O)] parameters (model LCi Photosynthesis System, ADC Bioscientific Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK) were measured and phenological aspects were recorded at different physiological stages as booting, anthesis and grain filling during experiment. Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance were associated with seed yield in B. juncea genotypes and the selection of genotypes with high gas exchange may provide development of mustard (B. juncea) genotypes with high yield.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYAÇETİN, F., EFEOĞLU, B., AYDIN, O. (2020). Photosynthetic performance responses in different phyiological development stages of some Brassica juncea genotypes in field condition. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 400–405. https://ajindex.com/articles/765271

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Abbate P E, Dardanelli J L, Cantarero M G, Maturano M, Melchiori J R M and Suero E E (2004). Climatic and water availability effects on water use efficiency in wheat. Crop Science. 44(2):474-483.
  2. Acatrinei L (2010). Photosynthesis rate, transpiration and stomatal conductance of vegetable species in protected organic crops. Lucrari Stiintifice sera Agronomie. 53(1): 32-35.
  3. Ahmadi A and Siosemardeh A (2005). Investigation on the physiological basis of grain yield and drought resistance in wheat: leaf photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and non stomatal limitation. International journal of agriculture and biology. 7(5): 807-811.
  4. Azizian A and Sepaskhah A R (2014). Maize response to different water, salinity and nitrogen levels: agronomic behavior. International Journal of Plant Production. 8(1): 107-130.
  5. Babac M T (2004). Possibility of an information system on plants of South–West Asia with particular reference to the Turkish Plants Data Service (TUBIVES). Turkish Journal of Botany. 28: 119–127.
  6. CFIA (1999). List of Varieties Which Are Registered in Canada. Variety Section. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canada, Ottawa Farquhal G D, Buckley T N and Miller J M (2002). Optimal Stomatal Control in Relation to Leaf Area and Nitrogen. Silva Fennica. 36(3): 625-637.
  7. Fischer R A, Rees D, Sayre K D, Lu Z M, Condon A G and Larqué Saavedra A (1998).Wheat yield progress is associated with higher stomatal conductance, higher photosynthetic rate and cooler canopies. Crop Science. 38:1467–1475.
  8. Guner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M and Babac M T (2012). Turkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarli Bitkiler). Nezahat Gokyigit Botanik Bahcesi Yayinlari Flora Dizisi I, ISBN: 978– 605–60425–7–7, Istanbul (in Turkish). Kayacetin F (2019). Morphological characterization and relationship among some important wild and domestic Turkish mustard genotypes (Brassica spp.). Turkish Journal of Botany. 43 (4): 499–515.
  9. Li P, Zhang S, Li F, Zhang S and Zhang H (2017). A phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes elucidates the relationships of the six economically important Brassica species comprising the triangle of U. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 111. Mulligan G A and Bailey L G (1975). The biology of Canadian weeds. 8. Sinapis arvensis L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55: 171–183.
  10. Nagaharu U (1935). Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Journal of Japanese Botany 7: 389–452. Orange M J and Ebad