KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Ekim 2019 Özel Sayısı

Borsa İstanbul’da Kayıtlı Türk Firmaların Firmaya Özgü Sermaye Yapısı Belirleyicileri: Bir Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Yaklaşımı

The Firm Specific Capital Structure Determinants of Turkish Firms Listed in Istanbul Stock Exchange: A Structural Equation Approach

Ali Sait ALBAYRAK
Sayfa
530–559
Yayın Tarihi
2019-10-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, liquidity and asset structure were found to affect short-term debt structure negatively, and long-term debt structure positively.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study tests the explanatory power of the most important capital structure theories.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The empirical results show that liquidity, asset structure, size, profitability, growth and volatility are the statistically significant factors and tax level, non-debt tax shield are the insignificant factors in all models.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, liquidity and asset structure were found to affect short-term debt structure negatively, and long-term debt structure positively.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:: Capital Structure · Trade-off Theory · Pecking Order Theory

Özet

This study tests the explanatory power of the most important capital structure theories. The study extends empirical studies in three ways. First, it tests a much broader set of theories, many of which have not previously been evaluated empirically. Second, since the capital structure theories have different empirical implications in respect to different types of debt structures, this study analyzes measures of short-term, long-term and short-term with long-term debt structure rather than an aggregate measure of total debt structure. The empirical results show that liquidity, asset structure, size, profitability, growth and volatility are the statistically significant factors and tax level, non-debt tax shield are the insignificant factors in all models. Firm size and growth are positive; volatility and profitability are the factors that are effective in the negative direction in all models. However, liquidity and asset structure were found to affect short-term debt structure negatively, and long-term debt structure positively.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALBAYRAK, A. S. (2019). Borsa İstanbul’da Kayıtlı Türk Firmaların Firmaya Özgü Sermaye Yapısı Belirleyicileri: Bir Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Yaklaşımı. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Ekim 2019 Özel Sayısı, 530–559. https://ajindex.com/articles/764315

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Anderson, R. W., & Carverhill, A. (2012). Corporate liquidity and capital structure. Review of Financial Studies, 25(3), 797-837.Baker, K. H., & Martin, G. S. (2011). Capital Structure and Corporate Decision: Theory, Evidence, and Practice. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.Bhole, L. M., & Mahakud, J. (2004). Trends and Determinants of Corporate Capital Structure in India. The Quarterly Journal of Indian Institute of Finance, 18, 37-55.Bradley, M., Jarrell, G. A., & Kim, E. H. (1984). On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 39, 857–878.Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. In K. A. Long, & J. S. Long, Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136–162).
  2. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Carmines, E., & Mclver, J. (1995). Strtegies in Testing for an Invariant Second Order Factor Structure: A Comparison of EQS and LISREL. Structural Equation Modeling, 2(1), 53-72.Chang, C., Lee, A. C., & Lee, C. F. (2009). Determinants of capital structure choice: A structural equation modeling approach. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49, 197-213.Chang, X., & Sudipto, D. (2009). Target Behavior and Financing: How Conclusive Is the Evidence? Journal of Finance, 64(4), 1767–1796.Chaplinsky, S., & Niehaus, G. (1993). Do Inside Ownership and Leverage Share Common Determinants? Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 32(4), 51-65.Cole, R. A. (2013, Winter). What Do We Know about the Capital Structure of Privately Held US Firms? Evidence from the Surveys of Small Business Finance. Financial Management, Winter, 777-813.De Haan, L., & Hinloopen, J. (2003). Preference hierarchies for internal finance, bank loans, bond and share issues: evidence for Dutch firms. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10(5), 661-681.De Jong, A., & Van Dijk, R. (2007). Determinants of leverage and agency problems: A regression approach with survey data. The European Journal of Finance, 13(6), 565-593.De Jong, A., & Veld, C. (2001). An empirical analysis of incremental capital structure decisions under managerial entrenchment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(10), 1857-1895.Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: which factors are reliably important? Financial Management, 38(1), 1-37.Grossman, S., & Hart, G. (1982). Corporate Financial Struct