Dergiler / ELT Research Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Using Blog-based Peer Comments to Promote L2 Writing Performance

Sayfa
140–161
Yayın Tarihi
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study provides implications for L2 academic writers and writing instructors concerning the use of blog-based peer comments and their types in the process of an academic writing course, where L2 writers experience blog-based academic writing and peer comment exchange in the light of training they have received.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research aimed to understand to what extent 24 freshmen students registered in an online academic writing course provided peer comments in a blog-based writing setting and whether there was a significant difference in the proportion of L2 writer's peer comment types.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results revealed that L2 writers provided online peer comments more on global areas than those on local areas across writing tasks and between the drafts in all tasks.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study provides implications for L2 academic writers and writing instructors concerning the use of blog-based peer comments and their types in the process of an academic writing course, where L2 writers experience blog-based academic writing and peer comment exchange in the light of training they have received.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Online peer feedback · blogs · L2 writing

Abstract

This research aimed to understand to what extent 24 freshmen students registered in an online academic writing course provided peer comments in a blog-based writing setting and whether there was a significant difference in the proportion of L2 writer's peer comment types. Data included students’ blog-based peer comments on their friends’ written drafts produced in three different writing genres: expository, data-commentary, and argumentative. Frequency analysis and Chi-square test of independence and for goodness-of-fit were used to analyze peer comments. Results revealed that L2 writers provided online peer comments more on global areas than those on local areas across writing tasks and between the drafts in all tasks. There was a significant difference in the proportion of global and local areas of L2 writers identified in the first drafts of three writing tasks and a significant decrease in the provision of global and local comments from the first task to the final. This study provides implications for L2 academic writers and writing instructors concerning the use of blog-based peer comments and their types in the process of an academic writing course, where L2 writers experience blog-based academic writing and peer comment exchange in the light of training they have received.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BİLKİ, Z., IRGİN, P. (2021). Using Blog-based Peer Comments to Promote L2 Writing Performance. ELT Research Journal, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 140–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/753943

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. AbuSeileek, A., & Abualsha’r, A. (2014). Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners’ writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 76–95. doi:10125/44355 Bilki, Z., & Irgin, P. (forthcoming, 2021). Blogging to build collaborative revision in L2 writing. In G. Yangin- Eksi, T. Angay-Crowder, L. Anyango-Kivuva, & S. Akayoglu (Eds.), New directions in using technology for writing instruction and practices for English language learners. Springer. Cao, Z., Yu, S., & Huang, J. (2019). A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates’ learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 102-112. doi:10.1016/ j.stueduc.2019.08.001 Chang, C. K., Chen, G. D., & Hsu, C. K. (2011). Providing adequate interactions in online discussion forums using few teaching assistants. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 193–202.
  2. Chen, C. W. (2010). Graduate students’ self-reported perspectives regarding peer feedback and feedback from writing consultants. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 151-158. doi: 10.1007/s12564-010-9081-5
  3. Ciftci, H., & Kocoglu, Z. (2012). Effects of peer e-feedback on Turkish EFL students’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 61–84. doi:10.2190/EC.46.1.c Council of Europe, (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Elola, G. I., & Oskoz, A. (2017). Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genre, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002 Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online writing. Computers and Competition, 24, 443-461.
  5. Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38, 371– 394. doi: 10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1
  6. Huang, H. Y. C. (2016). Students and the Teacher’s Perceptions on Incorporating the Blog Task and Peer Feedback into EFL Writing Classes through Blogs. English Language Teaching, 9(11), 38. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Jin, L., & Zhu, W. (2010). Dynamic motives in ESL computer-mediated peer response. Computers and Composition, 27, 284–303. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2010.09.00