Dergiler / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Designing Port Services Via Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment

Sayfa
283–300
Yayın Tarihi
2020-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

FQFD was concluded that the quality of the equipment, facilities, and technological infrastructure have to be improved for increasing the service quality of P1 port.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The objective of this study is to develop a proposal for developing port services that can improve the service quality by accurately satisfying the customer requirements.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Further, FQFD was used for designing of P1 port’s service.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:FQFD was concluded that the quality of the equipment, facilities, and technological infrastructure have to be improved for increasing the service quality of P1 port.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process · Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment · Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop a proposal for developing port services that can improve the service quality by accurately satisfying the customer requirements. In this study, a four-stage process was identified. In the first stage, data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used for measuring the efficiency of the container terminals. In the second stage, the requirements of the port customers were identified, and confirmatory factor analysis was applied for satisfying these requirements. Further, in the third stage, the consistency of the binary comparison matrices which consist of customer requirements was evaluated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In the final stage, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and fuzzy quality function deployment (FQFD) were jointly used for designing the port services. According to results, the resources requirement is considered to the most important criterion among the main criteria to improve the service quality of the port. Further, FQFD was used for designing of P1 port’s service. FQFD was concluded that the quality of the equipment, facilities, and technological infrastructure have to be improved for increasing the service quality of P1 port.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DOĞAN, H., ULUDAĞ, A. S., YAZAR, E. E. (2020). Designing Port Services Via Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 283–300. https://ajindex.com/articles/751865

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Akbaba, A., 2005. The quality function deployment (QFD) approach in customer focused service production: An application study for hospitality industry”, Anatolia, Journal of tourism Research, 16,1, 59-81.
  2. Baird, A.J., 1995. Privatisation of trust ports in The United Kingdom: Review and analysis of the first sales. Transport Policy. 2, 2, 135-143.
  3. Bakirci, F., 2006. Üretimde etkinlik ve verimlilik ölçümü, veri zarflama analizi teori ve uygulama. İstanbul: Atlas Yayınları, 1. Baskı.
  4. Becker, A., Inoue, S., Fischer, M., Schwegler, B., 2011. Considering climate change: A survey of global seaport administrators. CIFE Working Paper WP128, Stanford University, 1-69.
  5. Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E., Marchhetti, B., 2012. Development and test of a new fuzzy- QFD approach for characterizing customers rating of extra virgin olive oil. Food Quality and Preference. 24, 75- 84. Bottani, E., Rizzi, A., 2006. Strategic management of logistics service: A fuzzy QFD approach. International Journal of Production Economics. 103, 585-599.
  6. Branch, A. E., 1986. Elements of port operation and management. London, Chapman and Hall. Buyukozkan, G., Feyzioglu, O., Ruan, D., 2007. Fuzzy group decision-making to multiple preference formats in Quality Function Deployment. Computers in Industry. 58, 392- 402. Byrne, B.M., 2010. Structural equation modeling with AMOS, basic concepts, applications and programming. Taylor Francis Group, 2. Edition,
  7. LLC. Chamzini, A.Y., Yakhchali, S.H., 2012. Tunnel boring machine (TBM) selection using fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 30, 194-204.
  8. Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N., 2007. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended ahp-based approach. Omega The International Journal of Management Science. 35, 417-431.
  9. Chang, D.Y., 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research. 95, 649-655.
  10. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y., Seiford, L.M., 1994. Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and application. Springer Science +Business Media, LLC. Cooper, W.W., Li, S., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K., Thrall, R.M., Zhu, J., 2001. Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA: Some recent developments. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 15, 217-246.
  11. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L., M., Tone, K., 2007.
  12. Data envelopment analysis, A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Springer Science, Business Media, L