Dergiler / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Opening the Black-box of Bank Efficiency in Turkey with Two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis: A Study on Capital Adequacy Ratio

Sayfa
75–91
Yayın Tarihi
2022-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We also conclude that the minimum capital adequacy of 10.5% set by Basel III is not high to guide the commercial banks in Turkey to the efficient frontier.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Banks constitute approximately 90% of the Turkish financial system, so an efficiently operating banking sector is essential for financial consolidation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Additionally, the production process of banks fits into a typical two-stage system, thus opening the black-box on bank efficiency is necessary for an accurate efficiency measurement.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We also conclude that the minimum capital adequacy of 10.5% set by Basel III is not high to guide the commercial banks in Turkey to the efficient frontier.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis · Capital Adequacy Ratio · Bank Efficiency.

Abstract

Banks constitute approximately 90% of the Turkish financial system, so an efficiently operating banking sector is essential for financial consolidation. To ensure the efficient functioning of the banking production process, capital adequacy ratio (CAR), which is a basic indicator in controlling financial risk, should be managed properly. Additionally, the production process of banks fits into a typical two-stage system, thus opening the black-box on bank efficiency is necessary for an accurate efficiency measurement. By focusing on the link between efficiency, risk and return, this study aims to present a two-stage efficiency evaluation of the commercial banks in Turkey for the year 2018. In addition to the efficiency scores, frontier projections are determined, and an examination is made on the CAR targets. The empirical findings indicate that the inefficiency in the Turkish banking sector mainly stems from the operational performance and the average efficiency score of the state-owned banks is the highest. According to the target values, a pattern is detected between the efficiency scores and CAR. We also conclude that the minimum capital adequacy of 10.5% set by Basel III is not high to guide the commercial banks in Turkey to the efficient frontier.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKSOY, E. E. A., DİRİK, C., GÖKER, İ. E. K. (2022). Opening the Black-box of Bank Efficiency in Turkey with Two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis: A Study on Capital Adequacy Ratio. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 75–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/751833

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Abreu, M., and Mendes, V. (2002). Commercial bank interest margins and profitability: Evidence from E.U. countries. University of Porto Working Paper Series, 122. BRSA. (2010). Sorularla Basel III. Retrieved from https:// www.bddk.org.tr/ContentBddk/dokuman/duyuru_basel_ 0001_53.pdf BRSA. (2018). 2018 annual report. Retrieved from https://www. bddk.org.tr/ContentBddk/dokuman/hakkinda_0013_06. pdf BRSA. (2019). Turkish banking sector main indicators June 2019. Retrieved from https://www.bddk.org.tr/ContentBddk/ dokuman/veri_0023_08.pdf Berger, A. N. (1995). The profit-structure relationship in banking-- tests of market-power and efficient-structure hypotheses. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 27(2), 404-431.
  2. Besanko, D., and Kanatas, G. (1996) The regulation of bank capital: Do capital standards promote bank safety?. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 5(2), 160–183.
  3. Bhattacharya, H. (2013). Capital regulation and rising risk of banking industry: A financial accounting perspective. Academy of Banking Studies Journal, 12(1), 31-59.
  4. Bhattacharyya, A., Lovell, C. A. K., and Sahay, P. (1997). The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 332-345.
  5. Bialas, M., and Solek, A. (2010). Evolution of capital adequacy ratio. Economics & Sociology, 3(2), 48-57.
  6. Bouheni, F. B., and Rachdi, H. (2015). Bank capital adequacy requirements and risk-taking behavior in Tunisia: A simultaneous equations framework. Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(1), 231-238.
  7. Buyuksalvarci, A., and Abdioglu, H. (2011). Determinants of capital adequacy ratio in Turkish Banks: A panel data analysis. African Journal of Business Management, 5(27), 11199-11209.
  8. Cai, M., and Huang, Z. (2014). Analysis of non performing loan and capital adequacy ratio among Chinese banks in the post-reform period in China. Journal of Advanced Studies in Finance, 5(2), 133-144.
  9. Cecchetti, S. G., and Li, L. (2008). Do capital adequacy requirements matter for monetary policy?. Economic Inquiry, 46(4), 643-659.
  10. Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N., and Zhu, J. (2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1170-1176.
  11. Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., and Zhu, J. (2010). Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 138-142.
  12. Dagher, J., Dell’Ariccia, G., Laeven, L., Ratnovski, L., and Tong, H. (2016). Benefits and costs of ban