KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bartın Üniversitesi Uluslararası Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SOLUTION OF PHYLOGENETIC PROBLEM IN FABALES

Deniz AYGÖREN ULUER
Rahma ALSHAMRANI
Sayfa
195–206
Yayın Tarihi
2019-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, this study sounds a note of caution, with respect to interpreting the results of the “more data” approach, because the results have shown that large datasets can easily support an arbitrary root of Fabales.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Fabales is a cosmopolitan angiosperm order which consists of four families, Leguminosae (Fabaceae), Polygalaceae, Surianaceae and Quillajaceae.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The results of our simulation analyses have shown that Fabales phylogeny can be solved and the 5,000 bp fast-evolving data type may be sufficient to resolve the Fabales phylogeny question.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, this study sounds a note of caution, with respect to interpreting the results of the “more data” approach, because the results have shown that large datasets can easily support an arbitrary root of Fabales.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Data type · Fabales · phylogeny

Abstract

Fabales is a cosmopolitan angiosperm order which consists of four families, Leguminosae (Fabaceae), Polygalaceae, Surianaceae and Quillajaceae. The monophyly of the order is supported strongly by several studies, although interfamilial relationships are still poorly resolved and vary between studies; a situation common in higher level phylogenetic studies of ancient, rapid radiations. In this study, we carried out simulation analyses with previously published matK and rbcL regions. The results of our simulation analyses have shown that Fabales phylogeny can be solved and the 5,000 bp fast-evolving data type may be sufficient to resolve the Fabales phylogeny question. In our simulation analyses, while support increased as the sequence length did (up until a certain point), resolution showed mixed results. Interestingly, the accuracy of the phylogenetic trees did not improve with the increase in sequence length. Therefore, this study sounds a note of caution, with respect to interpreting the results of the “more data” approach, because the results have shown that large datasets can easily support an arbitrary root of Fabales.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ULUER, D. A., ALSHAMRANI, R. (2019). CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SOLUTION OF PHYLOGENETIC PROBLEM IN FABALES. Bartın Üniversitesi Uluslararası Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 195–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/740546

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. A.P.G. (2016). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. J. Linn. Soc. Bot., 181, 1-20
  2. Baas P., Wheeler E. & Chase M. (2000). Dicotyledonous wood anatomy and the APG system of angiosperm classification. J. Linn. Soc., Bot., 134, 3-17
  3. Bello M. A., Bruneau A., Forest F. & Hawkins J. A. (2009). Elusive relationships within order Fabales: phylogenetic analyses using matK and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot., 34, 102-114
  4. Bello M. A., Hawkins, J. A. & Rudall P. J. (2010). Floral ontogeny in Polygalaceae and its bearing on the homologies of keeled flowers in Fabales. ‎Int. J. Plant Sc.i, 171, 482-498
  5. Bello M. A., Rudall P. J. & Hawkins J. A. (2012). Combined phylogenetic analyses reveal interfamilial relationships and patterns of floral evolution in the eudicot order Fabales. Cladistics, 28, 393-421
  6. Bruneau A., Mercure M., Lewis G. P. & Herendeen P. S. (2008). Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes. Botany, 86, 697-718
  7. Cannon S. B., Mckain M. R., Harkess A., Nelson M.N., Dash S., Deyholos M. K., Peng, Y. Joyce, B. Stewart Jr C. N., Rolf M. & Kutchan, T. (2014). Multiple polyploidy events in the early radiation of nodulating and nonnodulating legumes. Mol. Biol. Evol., 32(1), 193-210
  8. CBOL Plant Working Group. (2009). A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106(31), 12794-12797.Chodat, R. 1896. Polygalaceae novae vel parum cognitae. Bulletin de l'Herbier Boissier, 4, 233-237
  9. Chodat R. (1896). Polygalaceae novae vel parum cognitae. Bulletin de l'Herbier Boissier, 4, 233-237
  10. Cotton J. A. & Page R. D. (2002). Going nuclear: gene family evolution and vertebrate phylogeny reconciled. Proc. R. Soc. B., 269, 1555-61
  11. Darriba D., Taboada G. L., Doallo R. & Posada D. (2012). jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods, 9, 772-772
  12. Dong W., Liu J., Yu J., Wang L. & Zhou S. (2012). Highly variable chloroplast markers for evaluating plant phylogeny at low taxonomic levels and for DNA barcoding. PloS One, 7(4), e35071
  13. Eriksen, B. (1993). Phylogeny of the Polygalaceae and its taxonomic implications. Plant Syst. Evol., 186, 33-55
  14. Eriksen B. & Persson C. (2007). Polygalaceae, Families and genera of flowering plants. In: K. Kubitski, editors. Springer, Berlin
  15. Felsenstein J. (1978). Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. S