KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research / 2022 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Machine Learning-Based Comparative Study For Heart Disease Prediction

Merve GÜLLÜ
M. Ali AKCAYOL
Necaattin BARIŞÇI
Sayfa
51–58
Yayın Tarihi
2022-09-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The experimental results show that the Random Forest algorithm is more successful than Adaboost, Bagging, Logitboost, and Support Vector machine using Cleveland and Statlog datasets.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Heart disease is one of the most common causes of death globally.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The proposed system consists of three components: (1) preprocess of datasets, (2) feature selection with genetic and tabu search algorithm, and (3) classification module.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The experimental results show that the Random Forest algorithm is more successful than Adaboost, Bagging, Logitboost, and Support Vector machine using Cleveland and Statlog datasets.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Classification · optimization · heart disease

Abstract

Heart disease is one of the most common causes of death globally. In this study, machine learning algorithms and models widely used in the literature to predict heart disease have been extensively compared, and a hybrid feature selection based on genetic algorithm and tabu search methods have been developed. The proposed system consists of three components: (1) preprocess of datasets, (2) feature selection with genetic and tabu search algorithm, and (3) classification module. The models have been tested using different datasets, and detailed comparisons and analysis were presented. The experimental results show that the Random Forest algorithm is more successful than Adaboost, Bagging, Logitboost, and Support Vector machine using Cleveland and Statlog datasets.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜLLÜ, M., AKCAYOL, M. A., BARIŞÇI, N. (2022). Machine Learning-Based Comparative Study For Heart Disease Prediction. Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 51–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/728994

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Zhao X, Liu X, Su Q, Zhang M, Zhu Y, Wang Q, Wang Q. “A Hybrid Classification System for Heart Disease Diagnosis Based on the RFRS Method”, Hindawi Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2017, doi: 10.1155/2017/8272091
  2. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Das SR, et al.; on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019.
  3. Kochanek K D, Xu J, Murphy S L, Miniño A M and Kung H C. “Deaths: final data for 2009,” National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1–116, 2011.
  4. Puntmann V O, Carerj M L, Wieters I. “Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)”. JAMA Cardiol. 2020,5(11),1265–1273.
  5. Wiharto W, Kusnanto H, and Herianto H. “Hybrid system of tiered multivariate analysis and artificial neural network for coronary heart disease diagnosis.” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 7(2), (2017). 1023. Amin M S, Chiam YK, and Varathan KD. “Identification of significant features and data mining techniques in predicting heart disease.” Telematics and Informatics, 36, (2019), 82-93.
  6. Magesh G and Swarnalatha P. “Optimal feature selection through a cluster-based DT learning (CDTL) in heart disease prediction”, Evolutionary Intelligence, (2020), 1-11. Uyar K, and İlhan A. “Diagnosis of heart disease using genetic algorithm based trained recurrent fuzzy neural networks”, Procedia computer science, 120, (2017). 588-593.
  7. Latha CBC and Jeeva SC. “Improving the accuracy of prediction of heart disease risk based on ensemble classification techniques”, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 16, (2019).
  8. Bataineh AA, Manacek S. “MLP-PSO Hybrid Algorithm for Heart Disease Prediction”, J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1208. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081208
  9. Hassan D, Hussein HI, Hassan MM. “Heart disease prediction based on pre-trained deep neural networks combined with principal component analysis”, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104019. Ahmed H, Eman MG, Younis, Hendawi A, Abdelmgeid AA, “Heart disease identification from patients’ social posts, machine learning solution on Spark”, Future Generation Computer Systems, 111, 2020, 714-722, https://doi.org/10.