KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Marmara Medical Journal / 2002 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

BEING IN THE TRANSITION PERIOD IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: TURKEY EXPERIENCE

Sibel KALAÇA
Çağrı KALAÇA
Sayfa
201–205
Yayın Tarihi
2016-12-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the Undergraduate Medical Education Report of the Turkish Medical Association (1), 23 out of 39 schools named their educational system as “integrated”, 9 as “classical", 5 as “integrated + active” and 2 schools as “active”.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:There are 47 medical schools in Turkey, 39 of which currently have undergraduate medical education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All these schools run their own programs independently.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the Undergraduate Medical Education Report of the Turkish Medical Association (1), 23 out of 39 schools named their educational system as “integrated”, 9 as “classical", 5 as “integrated + active” and 2 schools as “active”.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

There are 47 medical schools in Turkey, 39 of which currently have undergraduate medical education. All these schools run their own programs independently. According to the Undergraduate Medical Education Report of the Turkish Medical Association (1), 23 out of 39 schools named their educational system as “integrated”, 9 as “classical", 5 as “integrated + active” and 2 schools as “active”.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KALAÇA, S., KALAÇA, Ç. (2016). BEING IN THE TRANSITION PERIOD IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: TURKEY EXPERIENCE. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 201–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/688684

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Turkish Medical Association. Undergraduate Medical Education Report. 2000. www. ttb.org.tr/MOTER. Moore G, Block SD, Style CB, Mithcell R. The influence of the new pathway curriculum on Harvard medical students. Acad. Med. 69 (12) Dec 1994;69:983-989.
  2. Elçi ÖÇ, Aksakoğlu G. Dokuz Eylül joins the family: active medical education. Letter to the Editor. Med. Educ. 1998;32:222-223.
  3. Ralaça S, Ran B, Güney I, Çakın A, Tözün Ti. Students' perception about medical education at Marmara University School of Medicine. Marmara Med. J. 2000; 13:131 -136. Einucanc P, Ti ¡cholas T, Prideaux D. The new medical curriculum at Flinders University, South Australia: from concept to reality. Med. Teach, 2001;23:76-79.
  4. Bernier GM, Adler S, Ranter S, Meyer WJ. On changing curricula: Lessons learned at two dissimilar medical schools. Acad. Med. 2000;75:595-601. Van Damme W. Change in undergraduate medical education. Annales de la Société belge de medecine tropicale 1995; 75 Suppl 1:57-66. Turkish Parliament Research Commission. Medical Education in Turkey. Volume I: Student Aspect. Ankara. 1991; 125-126. Huppatz C. The Essential role of the student in curriculum planning. Med. Educ. 1996:30:9- 13. Cankur Ti Turan S. Medical education from students' perspective: I- Educational Aspect. Bulletin of Uludag University Medical School. Bursa. Vol. 26 (1-2-3) (1-2): 13-17, 1999-2000
  5. Akgigek F, Sagaklioglu F, Sozmen E, Randiloglu G, Demirgdren S, Saymer A. Improvement process of the Medical Education in Ege University Medical School. Bulletin of Ege Medicine, 1999 Feb; Ho: 13, 2-3. Vermunt JD. Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: /l phenomenographic analysis. High Educ 1996;31:25-50. Albenese M. Problem based learning: why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and skills. Med. Edu. 2000:34: 729-738. Evaluation methods: A resource handbook. Me Master University. Program for Educational Development, Program for Faculty Development and Educating Future Physicians of Ontario (EFPO) Project. 1995:1-10.