KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age / 2016 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of the Relationship Between Learning Approaches and Academic Engagement of Teacher Candidates

Yusuf Ziya OLPAK
Agah Tugrul KORUCU
Sayfa
55–62
Yayın Tarihi
2016-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There is no significant relationship between the scores gathered from surface learning of study process questionnaire and academic engagement scale.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this research, the relationship between learning approaches and academic engagement of teachers aimed to be examined.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The research carried out as survey model is executed by the data obtained from 194 students who responded the questions in data collection tools appropriately.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There is no significant relationship between the scores gathered from surface learning of study process questionnaire and academic engagement scale.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:learning approach · deep approach · surface approach

Abstract

In this research, the relationship between learning approaches and academic engagement of teachers aimed to be examined. The research carried out as survey model is executed by the data obtained from 194 students who responded the questions in data collection tools appropriately. The data is collected via the study process questionnaire adapted into Turkish by Yılmaz and Orhan 2011 , academic engagement scale developed by Korucu 2013 and the personal information form established by the authors. According to the study process questionnaire, 137 out of 194 students have deep approach while 57 students have surface approach. In addition, the scores received from academic engagement scale by students are demonstrated a significant difference by gender. According to the findings, there is a significant relationship between the scores gathered from deep learning of study process questionnaire and academic engagement scale at intermediate level in positive direction. There is no significant relationship between the scores gathered from surface learning of study process questionnaire and academic engagement scale.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OLPAK, Y. Z., KORUCU, A. T. (2016). Investigation of the Relationship Between Learning Approaches and Academic Engagement of Teacher Candidates. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 55–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/681348

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445.
  2. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college. Liberal Education, 79(4), 4-12.
  3. Baeten, M., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2008). Students’ approaches to learning and assessment preferences in a portfolio-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 36(5-6), 359–374.
  4. Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260.
  5. Batı, A. H., Tetik, C., & Gürpınar, E. (2010). Öğrenme yaklaşımları ölçeği yeni şeklini Türkçeye uyarlama ve geçerlilik güvenirlilik çalışması. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 30(5), 1639–1646.
  6. Berberoğlu, G., & Hei, L. M. (2003). A comparison of university students’ approaches to learning across Taiwan and Turkey. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 173–187.
  7. Beşoluk, Ş., & Önder, İ. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme yaklaşımları, öğrenme stilleri ve eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerinin incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 9(2), 679–693.
  8. Biggs, J. B. (1988). Assessing student approaches to learning. Australian Psychologist, 23(2), 197–206.
  9. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133–149.
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2008). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık (9th ed.). Ankara:
  11. PegemA. Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 203–21.
  12. Chavous, T. M., Rivas-Drake, D., Smalls, C., Griffin, T., & Cogburn, C. (2008). Gender matters, too: The influences of school racial discrimination and racial identity on academic engagement outcomes among African American adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 637. Çuhadar, C., Gündüz, Ş., & Tanyeri, T. (2013). Bilgisayar ve öğretim teknolojileri eğitimi bölümü öğrencilerinin ders çalışma yaklaşımları ve akademik öz-yeterlik algıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 251–259.
  13. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). Scho