KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Examination of the Relationship between the Technology Competencies of Special Education Undergraduate Students and Their Views on Distance Education

Cem ASLAN
Sayfa
276–283
Yayın Tarihi
2023-07-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There was no statistical significance for other sub-dimensions

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aimed to examine the relationship between the technology competencies of special education undergraduate students and their views on distance education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study group is consists of 212 students who study at the special education department in various universities in Turkey during the academic year of 2020-2021.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There was no statistical significance for other sub-dimensions
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2020-2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:s: Technology competency · distance education · special education

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the relationship between the technology competencies of special education undergraduate students and their views on distance education. This study employed the correlational research model. The study group is consists of 212 students who study at the special education department in various universities in Turkey during the academic year of 2020-2021. The study used the "Basic Technology Competencies for Educators Inventory" and the "The Distance Education Evaluation Scale." Pearson correlation coefficient was computed to determine the relationships among the dependent and independent variables. We implemented standard multiple regression analysis to predict distance education's views by the dimensions of technology competencies. Technology competencies inventory's word processing sub-dimension significantly and positively indicated the distance education scale's technical sub-dimension. There was no statistical significance for other sub-dimensions. Technology competencies inventory's basic computer operation skills and media communication sub-dimensions significantly and positively; networking sub-dimension significantly and negatively predicted the distance education scale's learning process sub-dimension. There was no statistical significance for other sub-dimensions

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ASLAN, C. (2023). Examination of the Relationship between the Technology Competencies of Special Education Undergraduate Students and Their Views on Distance Education. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 276–283. https://ajindex.com/articles/950053

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları: Sık kullanılan istatiksel analizler ve açıklamalı SPSS çözümleri [SPSS applications in social sciences: Frequently used statistical analyzes and annotated SPSS solutions]. İdeal Kültür. Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A. C., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. (2020). Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.018
  2. Algozzine, B., Lonnie, R., Flowers, C. P., Gretes, J. A., Hughes, C. D., & Lambert, R. (1999). Developing technology competencies in a college of education. Current Issues in Education, 2(3), 1-12. https://www.proquest.com/openview/49529bf9387854cb09449c369edf119c/1?cbl=41688&pqorigsite=gscholar
  3. Almerich, G., Orellana, N., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., & Díaz-García, I. (2016). Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers & Education, 100, 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.002
  4. Bakia, M., Murphy, R., Anderson, J., & Trinidad, G. E. (2011). International experiences with technology in education: Final report. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology and the Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. https://www.oerknowledgecloud.org/archive/iete-full-report.pdf
  5. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L.,.& Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379
  6. Botero, G. G., Questier, F., Cincinnato, S., He, T., & Zhu, C. (2018). Acceptance and usage of mobile assisted language learning by higher education students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 426-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9177-1
  7. Bower, M. (2019). Technology‐mediated learning theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1035-1048. https://doi:10.1111/bjet.12771
  8. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136-155. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1084227
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör an