KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Motives Behind Preference of Internet Communication Tools Among University Students

Abdulmalik Lawan AHMAD
Nadire CAVUS
Sayfa
41–45
Yayın Tarihi
2019-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

To make this research significant to future studies, the finding was discussed in-line with previous researches.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Researches on internet communication tool ICT patronage among university students are of paramount importance owing to the fact that ICT enriched students with communication skills and prepare them for future jobs as communication accounts for the major time spent at work by managers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This research was conducted at Near East University, Cyprus during 2015 spring semester. 99 students voluntarily responded to the questionnaire that was developed by the authors.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:To make this research significant to future studies, the finding was discussed in-line with previous researches.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Social media · ICT · Internet Communication Tools

Abstract

Researches on internet communication tool ICT patronage among university students are of paramount importance owing to the fact that ICT enriched students with communication skills and prepare them for future jobs as communication accounts for the major time spent at work by managers. The aim of the study is to determine factors that affect university students’ preference while choosing ICT. This research was conducted at Near East University, Cyprus during 2015 spring semester. 99 students voluntarily responded to the questionnaire that was developed by the authors. The data collected was analyzed based on mean, frequency, percentage and one-sample t-test techniques. It was found that students’ perceived usefulness, public influence, cost-effectiveness and ease of use are the key factors toward the preference of one ICT over another. To make this research significant to future studies, the finding was discussed in-line with previous researches.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AHMAD, A. L., CAVUS, N. (2019). Motives Behind Preference of Internet Communication Tools Among University Students. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 41–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/681311

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Bright, L. F., Kleiser, S. B., & Grau, S. L. (2015). Too much Facebook? An exploratory examination of social media fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.048
  2. Cavus, N., & Bicen, H. (2009). A study to find out the preferred free e-mail services used by university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.075
  3. Church, K., & de Oliveira, R. (2013). What’s up with WhatsApp?: comparing mobile instant messaging behaviours with traditional SMS. 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’13), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493190.2493225
  4. Forbes. (2012). WhatsApp - The Biggest Social Network You’ve Never Heard Of. Retrieved April 24, 2015, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/benedictevans/2012/10/19/whatsapp-the-biggest-social-network-youve-never-heard-of/
  5. Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Liu Sheng, O. R., & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247
  6. Khomh, F., Yuan, H., & Zou, Y. (2012). Adapting Linux for mobile platforms: An empirical study of Android. IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM, 629–632. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2012.6405339
  7. Lehr, W., & McKnight, L. W. (2003). Wireless Internet access: 3G vs. WiFi? Telecommunications Policy, 27(5–6), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(03)00004-1
  8. Ngai, E. W. T., Tao, S. S. C., & Moon, K. K. L. (2015). Social media research: Theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.09.004
  9. Osiceanu, M.-E. (2015). Psychological Implications of Modern Technologies: “Technophobia” versus “Technophilia.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180(November 2014), 1137–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.229
  10. Sheikh, A. A., Ganai, P. T., Malik, N. A., & Dar, K. A. (2013). Smartphone: Android Vs IOS. The SIJ Transactions on Computer Science Engineering & Its Applications (CSEA), 1(4), 141–148.
  11. Skierkowski, D., & Wood, R. M. (2012). To text or not to text? the importance of text messaging among college-aged youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 744–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.023
  12. Sprecher, S. (2014). Initial interactions on