KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY

Volkan KUKUL
Şahin GÖKÇEARSLAN
Mustafa Serkan GÜNBATAR
Sayfa
158–179
Yayın Tarihi
2017-01-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

For the construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were applied and the result showed that the scale isvalid and reliable.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Computer programming has been included in the curriculum of K12 education around the world and this has necessitated a tool for the assessment of the computer programming self-efficacy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Following the expert review, the item pool was conducted with 233 students in a public secondary school which provides education to the age group of 12-14.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:For the construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were applied and the result showed that the scale isvalid and reliable.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Computer programming has been included in the curriculum of K12 education around the world and this has necessitated a tool for the assessment of the computer programming self-efficacy. Thus, this study aims to suggest the necessary scale for the field. In the scale development, the steps of classical measurement theory were applied. Following the expert review, the item pool was conducted with 233 students in a public secondary school which provides education to the age group of 12-14. As a result of the study, a unidimensional 5-point Likert scale of 31 items was obtained. The factor loads varied between 0.47 and 0.71 and the explained variance rate was 41.15%. In the analysis of the internal consistency, sufficient values were found; the Cronbach alpha as 0.95 and the equivalent halves method result as 0.96. For the construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were applied and the result showed that the scale isvalid and reliable.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KUKUL, V., GÖKÇEARSLAN, Ş., GÜNBATAR, M. S. (2017). COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 158–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/67930

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Anastasiadou, S.D., & Karakos, A.S. (2011). The beliefs of electrical and computer engineering students regarding computer programming. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 7(1), 37-51.
  2. Armoni, M. (2011). The nature of CS in K-12 curricula: the roots of confusion. ACM Inroads, 2(4), 19-20. doi:10.1145/2038876.2038883 Askar, P., & Davenport, D. (2009).An investigation of factors related to self-efficacy for java Programming among engineering students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology TOJET, 8(1): 26-32.
  3. Austin, H.S. (1987). Predictors of pascal programming achievement for community college students. Proceedings of the eighteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, Missouri, United States, 161-164. doi: 10.1145/31726.31752 Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54. doi:10.1145/1929887.1929905 Black, T.R. (2006). Helping novice programming students succeed. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22(2), 109–114.
  5. Booth, S. (1992). Learning to program: A phenomenographic perspective. University of Gothenburg Publication, http://hdl.handle.net/2077/16224
  6. Brichacek, A. (2014). Computational thinking boosts students’ higher-order skills. Retrieved May 21, 2015 from https://www.iste.org/explore/articleDetail?articleid=232&category=Featured-videos&article=Computational%20thinking%20boosts%20students%E2%80%99%20higher-order%20skills.
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for the social sciences], Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with lisrel, prelis and simplis: basic concepts, applications, and programmings. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocatiates, Publishers.
  9. Caspersen, M. E., & Kolling M. (2009). STREAM: A first programming process. ACT Transaction on Computing Education, 9, 1-29. doi:10.1145/1513593.1513597 Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189-211, http://www.jstor.org/