Dergiler / Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Numerical solution of two phase solidification problem using dynamic substructuring based on adaptive error estimation

Sayfa
127–144
Yayın Tarihi
2015-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Numerical solutions are presented and it is shown that the proposed approach has advantages over the alternative methods and, by the virtue of the adaptive error estimation algorithm, significantly decreases the CPU time of numerical solutions while it increases the accuracy of solutions and locates precisely the solidification front and mushy zone

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:N umerical solution of solidification of metals with a sharp front, in particular solidification of lead, is investigated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Following, by the use of an adaptive error estimation algorithm to find the location of solidification front and mushy zone, dynamic substructuring technique is developed to decrease the computational cost and to increase the accuracy of results.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Numerical solutions are presented and it is shown that the proposed approach has advantages over the alternative methods and, by the virtue of the adaptive error estimation algorithm, significantly decreases the CPU time of numerical solutions while it increases the accuracy of solutions and locates precisely the solidification front and mushy zone
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Solidification · Finite Element Methods · Substructuring

Abstract

N umerical solution of solidification of metals with a sharp front, in particular solidification of lead, is investigated. Considering the fact that the associated CPU time and memory requirement may be costly for large domains, alternatives are searched. It is observed that using a substructuring technique with a local mesh refinement is promising. Following, by the use of an adaptive error estimation algorithm to find the location of solidification front and mushy zone, dynamic substructuring technique is developed to decrease the computational cost and to increase the accuracy of results. Superconvergent patch recovery technique is used to obtain the heat fluxes to evaluate the error energy norm of elements at each analysis step. Solidification front, mushy zone and elements having errors above a threshold value are captured with the error estimator. Then, elements having errors above the threshold value are refined by creating a substructure which is independent from the original global mesh. Equations of the global coarse mesh are augmented with the equations of the substructure. Employing the equations of the original coarse mesh help reduce the computational cost. Numerical solutions are presented and it is shown that the proposed approach has advantages over the alternative methods and, by the virtue of the adaptive error estimation algorithm, significantly decreases the CPU time of numerical solutions while it increases the accuracy of solutions and locates precisely the solidification front and mushy zone

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UYAR, O., MUGAN, A. (2015). Numerical solution of two phase solidification problem using dynamic substructuring based on adaptive error estimation. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 127–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/671666

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Franca AS and Haghigi K. Adaptive finite element analysis of transient thermal problems. Numerical Heat Transfer Part B. 26 (1994) 273-292. Juric D and Tryggvason G. A front-tracking method for dendritic solidification. Journal of Computational Physics. 123 (1996) 127-148.
  2. Chen Y, Im Y-T, Yoo J. Finite element analysis of solidification of aluminum with natural convection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 52 (1995) 592-609.
  3. Provatas N, Goldenfeld N and Dantzig J. Adaptive mesh refinement computation of solidification microstructures using dynamic data structures. Journal of Computational Physics. 148 (1999) 265-290. Lewis RW and Ravindran K. Finite element simulation of metal casting. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 47 (2000) 29-59. Merle R and Dolbow J. Solving thermal and phase change problems with the extended finite element method. Computational Mechanics 28 (2002) 339-350.
  4. Chessa J, Smolinski P and Belytschko T. The extended finite element method (xfem) for solidification problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 53 (2002) 1959-1977.
  5. Ji H, Chopp D and Dolbow JE. A hybrid extended finite element/level set method for modeling phase transformations. International Journal For Numerical Methods in Engineering. 54 (2002) 1209-1233.
  6. Zhao P, Venere M, Heinrich JC, Poirier DR. Modeling dendritic growth of a binary alloy. Journal of Computational Physics. 188 (2003) 434-461. Zhang XR and Xu X. Finite element analysis of pulsed laser bending: the effect of melting and solidification. Journal of Applied Mechanics 71 (2004) 321-326.
  7. Takaki T, Fukuoka T, Tomita Y. Directional solidification of a binary alloy using adaptive finite element method. Journal of Crystal Growth. 283 (2005) 263-278.
  8. Zabaras N, Ganapathysubramanian B, Tan L. Modelling dendritic solidification with melt convection using the extended finite element method. Journal of Computational Physics. 218 (2006) 200-227.
  9. Zhang L, Shen H-F, Rong Y, Huang T-Y. Numerical simulation on solidification and thermal stress of continuous casting billet in mold based on meshless methods. Materials and Science Engineering. A466 (2007) 71-78.
  10. Wang H, Li R, Tang T. Efficient computation of dendritic growth with r-adaptive finite element methods. Journal of Computational Physics. 227 (2008) 5984-6000.
  11. Hu X, Li R and Tang T. A multi-mesh adaptive finite element approximation to phase field models. Communications in Computational Physics. 5 (2009) 1012-10