Dergiler / Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

Implementation of Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Origami-Based Lessons and Their Views about Student Learning

Sayfa
154–171
Yayın Tarihi
2019-12-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings of the study illustrated that the existence of learning types represented by students in the origami-based lessons differentiated based on the teachers’ levels of constructivist-based teaching.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In the case study, the occurrence of student learning types in the origami-based mathematics classrooms was investigated based on teachers’ teaching.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the quantitative part of the study, the teaching of middle school mathematics teachers (MSMT) were observed to compare the different learning types based on their levels of constructivist-based teaching performances.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings of the study illustrated that the existence of learning types represented by students in the origami-based lessons differentiated based on the teachers’ levels of constructivist-based teaching.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:constructivist-based teaching · learning types · middle school mathematics teachers

Özet

In the case study, the occurrence of student learning types in the origami-based mathematics classrooms was investigated based on teachers’ teaching. In the quantitative part of the study, the teaching of middle school mathematics teachers (MSMT) were observed to compare the different learning types based on their levels of constructivist-based teaching performances. Qualitative data were collected through interviews, observations, and field notes in origami-based mathematics lessons and then analyzed. The findings of the study illustrated that the existence of learning types represented by students in the origami-based lessons differentiated based on the teachers’ levels of constructivist-based teaching.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UYGUN, T. (2019). Implementation of Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Origami-Based Lessons and Their Views about Student Learning. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 154–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/66244

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Arıcı, S. & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2015). The effect of origami-based instruction on spatial visualization, geometry achievement, and geometric reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 179-200.
  2. Boakes, N. J. (2006). The effects of origami lessons on students’ spatial visualization skills and achievement levels in a seventh-grade mathematics classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University. Boakes, N. J. (2008). Origami-mathematics lessons: Paper folding as a teaching tool. Mathitudes, 1(1), 1-9.
  3. Boakes, N. J. (2009). Origami instruction in the middle school mathematics classroom: Its impact on spatial visualization and geometry knowledge of students. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 32(7), 1-12.
  4. Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research. New York: Longman. Boulter, D. R. (1992). The effects of instruction on spatial ability and geometry performance. Unpublished master’s thesis. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Boyraz, S. (2008). The effects of computer based instruction on seventh grade students’ spatial ability, attitudes toward geometry, mathematics and technology. Unpublished master’s thesis. Middle East Technical University,Ankara,
  5. Turkey. Chen, K. (2006). Math in motion: origami math for students who are deaf and hard of hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(2), 262-266.
  6. Cipra, B. A. (2001). In the Fold: Origami Meets Mathematics. SIAM News, 34 (8), 1-4.
  7. Coad, L. (2006). Paper folding in the middle school classroom and beyond. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 62(1), 6-13.
  8. Cakmak, S, Isiksal, M. & Koc, Y. (2014). Investigating effect of origami-based instruction on elementary students’ spatial skills and perceptions. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(1), 59-68.
  9. Demaine, E. (2004). Folding and Unfolding in Computational Geometry. http://courses.csail.mit.edu/6.885/fall04. Accessed at 24 March 2018.
  10. Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In: Grouws DA (ed.). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillian/NCTM. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  11. Graham, J. K. & Fennell, F. S. (2001). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics and Teacher Education: Preparing and Empowering Teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 101 (6), 319-327.
  12. Jones, A. (2010). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views of manipula