KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2012 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Effect of the composite curing light mode on polymerization shrinkage of resin composites

Ozden BEKTAŞ OZEL
Feridun HÜRMÜZLÜ
Diğdem EREN
Sayfa
1–6
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was also foundout that some of the curing units affected the shrinkage positively in soft-start mode.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of light curing method on the polymerizationshrinkage of composite resins.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: Eight methods of four different light curing units were tested by forming 16 groupsusing two different composite types.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was also foundout that some of the curing units affected the shrinkage positively in soft-start mode.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of light curing method on the polymerizationshrinkage of composite resins. Materials and Methods: Eight methods of four different light curing units were tested by forming 16 groupsusing two different composite types. Resin composite specimens weights were determined with an analyticalelectronic hydrostatic balance in the air and in water before and after curing. Then specific gravity values weredetermined. Volumetric polymerization shrinkage was calculated using mathematical formulas.Results: According to the results of this in-vitro study, polymerization shrinkage differed significantly amongthe light curing units. Conclusions: When the amount of polymerization shrinkage was compared, it was determined that the curingmethod, which has the greatest total energy density, caused the greatest amount of shrinkage. It was also foundout that some of the curing units affected the shrinkage positively in soft-start mode.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OZEL, O. B., HÜRMÜZLÜ, F., EREN, D. (2022). Effect of the composite curing light mode on polymerization shrinkage of resin composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/649402

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Tolidis K, Nobecourt A, Randall R. Effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on volumetric polymerization shrinkage of various composites. Dent Mater 1998;14(6):417-423. [CrossRef] 2. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125(6):687-701. 3. Yap AU, Tan CH, Chung SM. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2004;29(3):269-274. 4. Yap AU, Lim LY, Yang TY, Ali A, Chung SM. Influence of dietary solvents on strength of nanofill and Ormocer composites. Oper Dent 2005;30(1):129-133. 5. Braga RR, Ferracane JL. Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004;15(3):176- 184. [CrossRef] 6. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: The monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105(2):97-116. [CrossRef] 7. Sakaguchi RL, Berge HX. Reduced light energy density decreases post- gel contraction while maintaining the degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 1998;26(8):695-700. [CrossRef] 8. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials. 2002;
  2. Mosby, St. Louis. 9. Nomoto R, Uchida K, Hirasawa T. Effect of light intensity on polymerization of light cured composite resins. Dent Mater J 1994;13(2):198-205. 10. Soh MS, Yap AUJ. Influence of curing modes on crosslink density in polymer structures. J Dent 2004;32(4):321-326. [CrossRef] 11. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without “soft-start polymerization” J Dent 1997;25(3- 4):321- 330. 12. Kanca J, Suh BI. Pulse activation: Reducing resin-based composite contraction at the enamel cavosurface margins. Am J Dent 1999;12(3):107-112. 13. Friedl KH, Schmaltz G, Hiller KA, Markl A. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations with and without “softstart” polymerization. Oper Dent 2000;25(1):26-32. 14. Oberholzer TG, Pameijer CH, Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ. The effect of different power densities and method of exposure on the marginal adaptation of four light-cured dental restorative materials. Biomater 2003;24(20):3593-3598. [CrossRef] 15. Yap AUJ, Soh MS, Han VTS, Siow KS. Influence of curing lights and modes on cross-link density of dental composites. Oper Dent 2004;29(4):410-415. 16. Puckett AD, Smith R. Method to measure the polymerization shrinkage of light-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68(1):56-58. [CrossRef] 17. Ilie N, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to t