KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2013 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Can Er:YAG laser be an alternative to conventional methods for repairing composite resins?

Ozden BEKTAŞ OZEL
Seyda SİSO HERGUNER
Didem EREN
Sayfa
125–132
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results: There were no significant differences between all groups (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of four different surface treatments on the repair bond strength of aged composite resin by employing the micro-shear test.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All samples were thermocycled for 1000 cycles between (5±2) and (55±2) ◦ C with a dwell time of 30 s and a transfer time of 5 s.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results: There were no significant differences between all groups (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of four different surface treatments on the repair bond strength of aged composite resin by employing the micro-shear test. Material and Methods: Forty-eight composite blocks were prepared. All samples were thermocycled for 1000 cycles between (5±2) and (55±2) ◦ C with a dwell time of 30 s and a transfer time of 5 s. The samples were randomly divided into four groups and were subjected to the following treatments (n=12): Group 1 - phosphoric acid; Group 2 - diamond bur ; Group 3 - diamond bur+ phosphoric acid; Group 4 - Er:YAG Laser. After the aging procedure, fresh microhybrid resin composite was bonded to the treated surfaces with an etch and rinse adhesive resin. The repair bond strength of each sample was determined using a micro-shear bond strength test. All data were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis test. Results: There were no significant differences between all groups (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OZEL, O. B., HERGUNER, S. S., EREN, D. (2022). Can Er:YAG laser be an alternative to conventional methods for repairing composite resins?. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 125–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/477209

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Foitzik M, Attin T. Korrekturfüllung—Möglichkeiten und Durchführung. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2004;114:1003–1011
  2. Padipatvuthikul P, Mair LH. Bonding of composite to water aged composite with surface treatments. Dent Mater 2007;23:519–525
  3. Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Composite–composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent 2003;31:521–525
  4. Vanckerckoven H, Lambrechts P, Van Beylen M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surfaces of composite resins. J Dent Res 1982;61:791–795
  5. Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite–composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Invest 2009;13:317–323
  6. Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Composite-to- composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of microfilled hybrid resin; effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent 2007;9: 25-31
  7. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo JJr, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:41-49
  8. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent 2008;36:969-976
  9. Cesar PF, Meyer Faara PM, Miwa Caldart R, Gastaldoni Jaeger R, da Cunha Ribeiro F. Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on Artglass using different surface treatments. Am J Dent 2001;14:373- 377
  10. Passos SP, Ozcan M, Vanderlei AD, Leite FP, Kimpara ET, Bottino MA. Bond strength durability of direct and indirect composite systems following surface conditioning for repair. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:443- 447
  11. Rossato DM, Bandéca MC, Saade EG, Lizarelli RFZ, Bagnato VS, Saad JRC. Influence of Er:YAG laser on surface treatment of aged composite resin to repair restoration. Laser Physics 2009;19:2144-2149
  12. Bader C, Krejci I. Indications and limitations of Er:YAG laser applications in dentistry. Am J Dent 2006;19:178-186
  13. Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:358–360
  14. Kupiec KA, Barkmeier WW. Laboratory evaluation of surface treatments for composite repair. Oper Dent 1996;21:59–62
  15. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging condi