Dergiler / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1

REGIONAL INEQUALITIES IN TURKEY: POST 2001 ERA

Sayfa
125–147
Yayın Tarihi
2015-09-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Additionally results also highlight the non-randomness of this polarization even at NUTS II disaggregation which once more points out that spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity works together in Turkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper examines the path of the regional inequalities in Turkey for the post 2001 period.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:After the financial turmoil and the sharp downturn in the economy in 2001, Turkey managed to sustain 3.6 % real per capita GDP growth between 2002 and 2014.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Additionally results also highlight the non-randomness of this polarization even at NUTS II disaggregation which once more points out that spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity works together in Turkey.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2001 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Eşitsizlik · Mekânsal Sistem · Panel Veri

Özet

This paper examines the path of the regional inequalities in Turkey for the post 2001 period. After the financial turmoil and the sharp downturn in the economy in 2001, Turkey managed to sustain 3.6 % real per capita GDP growth between 2002 and 2014. Even the increase in the GDP is remarkable the way that the growth is distrib- uted at the regional scale is questionable. Originating from the concern on the ability of Turkish regions to equally benefit from the economic growth, regional inequalities are evaluated via regional wage income differences at NUTS II disaggregation for the 2003-2008 period. Even initial set of analysis point out a fall in the regional wage income gaps, a careful interpretation indicate the persistence of the heterogeneous pattern coming from the pre-2001 period. Analysis covering all industries indicates that, out of the 26 sub-regions, 5 of the NUTS II regions in the eastern Turkey move to a group of regions with lower wage income during the 2003-2008 period. Meanwhile neither the high wage region clusters nor the outlier regions acting as geographic transitions do realize a significant movement within the distribution. Results are much or less consistent for manufacturing production as well. In general findings underline a period of ongoing polarization in the wage income at NUTS II level during the post 2001 period in Turkey. Additionally results also highlight the non-randomness of this polarization even at NUTS II disaggregation which once more points out that spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity works together in Turkey.

Abstract

This paper examines the path of the regional inequalities in Turkey for the post 2001 period. After the financial turmoil and the sharp downturn in the economy in 2001, Turkey managed to sustain 3.6 % real per capita GDP growth between 2002 and 2014. Even the increase in the GDP is remarkable the way that the growth is distributed at the regional scale is questionable. Originating from the concern on the ability of Turkish regions to equally benefit from the economic growth, regional inequalities are evaluated via regional wage income differences at NUTS II disaggregation for the 2003-2008 period. Even initial set of analysis point out a fall in the regional wage income gaps, a careful interpretation indicate the persistence of the heterogeneous pattern coming from the pre-2001 period. Analysis covering all industries indicates that, out of the 26 sub-regions, 5 of the NUTS II regions in the eastern Turkey move to a group of regions with lower wage income during the 2003-2008 period. Meanwhile neither the high wage region clusters nor the outlier regions acting as geographic transitions do realize a significant movement within the distribution. Results are much or less consistent for manufacturing production as well. In general findings underline a period of ongoing polarization in the wage income at NUTS II level during the post 2001 period in Turkey. Additionally results also highlight the non-randomness of this polarization even at NUTS II disaggregation which once more points out that spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity works together in Turkey

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARAHASAN, B. (2015). REGIONAL INEQUALITIES IN TURKEY: POST 2001 ERA. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1, 125–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/6466

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. ANSELIN Luc, “Thirty Years of Spatial Econometrics”, Papers in Regional Science, Vol.89, 2010, pp.3-25. ANSELIN Luc, “Local Indicators of Spatial Association-LISA”, Geographical Analysis, Vol. 27, No.2, 1995, pp. 93-115.
  2. BADINGER Harald, MÜLLER Werner and TONDL Gabriele, “Regional Convergence in the European Union, 1985-1999: A Spatial Dynamic Panel Analysis”, Regional Studies, Vol.38, No.3, 2004, pp.241-253. BARRO Robert J. and SALA-I MARTIN Xavier, “Convergence”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.100, No.2, 1992, pp.223-251. BİLGEL Fırat and KARAHASAN Burhan Can, “The Economic Costs of Separatists Terrorism in Turkey”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, DOI: 10.1177/0022002715576572, 2015. BOURGUIGNON Francois, “Decomposable Income Inequality Measures”, Econometrica, Vol.47,No. 4, 1979, 901-920.
  3. COMBES Pierre-Philippe, MAYER Thiery, and THISSE Jacques-François, Economic Geography, The Integration of Regions and Nations, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008.
  4. CUERASMA Jesus Crespo, RITZBERGER-GRUNWALD Doris and SILGONER Maria Antoinette, “Growth, convergence and the EU membership”, Applied Economics, Vol.40, No. 5, 2008, pp.643-656. DOĞRUEL Fatma, “Türkiye’de Bölgesel Politikalar”, Değişen Türkiye Dönüşen Mekan,¸Ed. A. Eraydın, 2006, Dost Kitapevi Yayınları, pp. 164-195.
  5. DOĞRUEL Fatma, Bölgesel Kalkınma ve Kalkınma Ajansları, TÜRKONFED Yayınları, 2012. DOĞRUEL Fatma and DOĞRUEL Suut, “Türkiye’de Bölgesel Gelir Farklılıkları ve Büyüme”, İktisat Üzerine Yazılar I Küresel Düzen: Birikim, Devlet ve Sı- nıflar Korkut Boratav’a Armağan, Eds. A.Köse, F.Şenses, E.Yeldan, 2003. ELVEREN Adem Yavuz, “Wage Inequality in Turkey: Decomposition by Statistical Regions, 1980-2001”, Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Vol.22, 2010, pp.55-72. FİLİZTEKİN Alpay, “Regional Unemployment in Turkey”, Papers in Regional Science, Vol.88, No.4, 2009, pp.863-878.
  6. FOTHERINGHAM A. Stewart, BRUNSDON Chris and CHARLTON Martin, Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships, Wiley, 2002. GEZİCİ Ferhan and HEWINGS Geoffrey J.D., “Regional Convergence and Economic Performance of Peripheral Areas in Turkey”, Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Vol.16, No.2, 2004, pp.113-132. 147 KARAHASAN Burhan Can and UYAR Emrah, “Spatial Distribution of Education and Regional Inequalities in Turkey”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, No.30130, 2009. KARAHASAN Burhan Can, “Türkiye’de Bölgesel Eşitsizlikler: Mekansal Bağlar ve Yerel İstikrarsızlık