Dergiler / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

The use of autologous epidermal grafts for diabetic foot ulcer emergencies: A clinical study

Sayfa
262–267
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The age, gender, pre-post appli- cation wound area (cm2), time of healing, ASA, and VAS variables were compared each other and analyzed statistically.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:BACKGROUND: There are various surgical and invasive treatment systems such as conservative skin grafts and autologous epider- mal grafting (AEG) for diabetic foot ulcers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was conducted with 15 diabetic foot ulcer patients, and after written and signed consent forms were taken, AEG system was applied to all patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The age, gender, pre-post appli- cation wound area (cm2), time of healing, ASA, and VAS variables were compared each other and analyzed statistically.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are various surgical and invasive treatment systems such as conservative skin grafts and autologous epider- mal grafting (AEG) for diabetic foot ulcers. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using a novel epidermal graft harvesting system in diabetic foot ulcer emergencies. METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was conducted with 15 diabetic foot ulcer patients, and after written and signed consent forms were taken, AEG system was applied to all patients. All of the clinical data of the patients such as their American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System scores, size of pre-application wound area (cm 2), time to complete re-epithelization of the wound, pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS) for both donor and recipient sites, changes in size of wound, complete dermal response time, and patients’ demographics, comorbidities were recorded. The age, gender, pre-post appli- cation wound area (cm2), time of healing, ASA, and VAS variables were compared each other and analyzed statistically. P

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Saydam, M., Yilmaz, K. B., Bostanci, M. T., Turan, M., Akıncı, M., Yılmaz, İ., Oztas, M., Guven, H. E. (2022). The use of autologous epidermal grafts for diabetic foot ulcer emergencies: A clinical study. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 262–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/644056

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. George H, Roger C. Chronic wound healing: A review of current man- agement and treatments. Adv Ther 2017;34:599–610
  2. Harold B, Olivera S, Robert FD, Hyacinth E, Brian L, Irena P, et al. Molecular markers in patients with chronic wounds to guide surgical de- bridement. Mol Med 2007;13:30–9
  3. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, Jude E, Piaggesi A, Bakker K, et al. High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia 2007;50:18–25
  4. Chung KC, Ghori AK. Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dress- ings. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:307–8
  5. Demirtas Y, Yagmur C, Soylemez F, Ozturk N, Demir A. Management of split-thickness skin graft donor site: A prospective clinical trial for com- parison of five different dressing materials. Burns 2010;36:999–1005
  6. Kiistala U, Mustakallio KK. In vivo separation of epidermis by produc- tion of suction blisters. Lancet 1964;2:1444–5
  7. Osborne SN, Schmidt MA, Derrick K, Harper JR. Epidermal micro- grafts produced via an automated and minimally invasive tool form at the dermal/epidermal junction and contain proliferative cells that secrete wound healing growth factors. Adv Skin Wound Care 2015;28:397–405
  8. Serena T, Francius A, Taylor C, MacDonald J. Use of a novel epidermal harvesting system in resource-poor countries. Adv Skin Wound Care 2015;28:107–12
  9. World Health Organization. Non-communicable Diseases Country Pro- files 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014
  10. Costanzo U, Streit M, Braathen LR. Autologous suction blister grafting for chronic leg ulcers. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008;22:7–10
  11. Jung KE, Kim MH, Kim JY, Park BC. Comparison of modified Korean cupping method and conventional respiratory suction unit for epidermal graft. Int J Dermatol 2014;53:e384–6
  12. Nadine H-H, Nicola B, Muholan K, Oliver S, Keith H, Ash M, et al. A prospective, multicentre study on the use of epidermal grafts to optimise outpatient wound management. Int Wound J 2017;14:241–9
  13. Gupta S, Ajith C, Kanwar AJ, Kumar B. Surgical pearl: Standardized suc- tion syringe for epidermal grafting. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;52:348–50
  14. Awad SS. Chinese cupping: A simple method to obtain epithelial grafts for the management of resistant localized vitiligo. Dermatol Surg 2008;34:1186–92; discussion 1192–3
  15. Gabriel A, Sobota RV, Champaneria M. Initial experience with a new epi