KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 66

Turkish Adaptation of Basic Psychological Needs For Energy Conservation: Reliability and Validity Study

Birgül ÇAKIR YILDIRIM
Özgül YILMAZ TÜZÜN
Sayfa
405–417
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

All of the validity and reliability analysis revealed that Turkish version of Basic Psychological Needs for Energy Conservation Scale is valid and reliable, and it can be used for further studies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study the Basic Psychological Needs for Energy Conservation Scale developed by Sweeney, Webb, Mazzarol and Sautar (2014) was adapted to Turkish by ensuring its validity and reliability.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Pilot study consists of 172 preservice science teachers and main study consists of 1136 preservice science teachers.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:All of the validity and reliability analysis revealed that Turkish version of Basic Psychological Needs for Energy Conservation Scale is valid and reliable, and it can be used for further studies.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Basic Psychological Needs · Energy Conservartion · Instrument Adaptation

Abstract

In this study the Basic Psychological Needs for Energy Conservation Scale developed by Sweeney, Webb, Mazzarol and Sautar (2014) was adapted to Turkish by ensuring its validity and reliability. Pilot study and main study were conducted with two different samples. Pilot study consists of 172 preservice science teachers and main study consists of 1136 preservice science teachers. While adapting the scale to Turkish, content and construct validity along with back-to-back translation were achieved. In terms of construct validity exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were applied to different samples to test the structure of the scale. Both analyses revealed that the scale has two factors: autonomy/competence and relatedness. The desired goodness of fit values was attained for CFA. In order to address the reliability of the scale, item analysis, Cronbach Alpha reliability and item-total correlation analysis were conducted. All these analyses confirmed the reliability of the scale. All of the validity and reliability analysis revealed that Turkish version of Basic Psychological Needs for Energy Conservation Scale is valid and reliable, and it can be used for further studies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILDIRIM, B. Ç., TÜZÜN, Ö. Y. (2022). Turkish Adaptation of Basic Psychological Needs For Energy Conservation: Reliability and Validity Study. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 66, 405–417. https://ajindex.com/articles/641954

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). IBM SPSS Amos 21 User’s Guide. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/ibm-spss-21-amos-documentation
  2. Baxter, D., & Pelletier, L. G. (2020). The roles of motivation and goals on sustainable behaviour in a resource dilemma: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69(May 2018), 101437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101437
  3. Cooke, A. N., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2015). Environmentally active people: the role of autonomy, relatedness, competence and self-determined motivation. Environmental Education Research, 22(5) 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1054262
  4. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education. (7th Ed). New York: Routledge. Darner, R. (2012). An empirical test of self-determination theory as a guide to fostering environmental motivation. Environmental Education Research, 18(4), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.638739
  5. Darner, R. (2014). Self-determination theory as a guide to forstering environmental motivation. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.2.39-49
  6. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating Internalization: The Self‐Determination Theory Perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
  7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
  8. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. M. (1990). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation, ed. R. Dienstbier, pp. 237–88. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  10. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. Huang, J., Zhang, G., Zhang, Y., Guan, X., Wei, Y., & Guo, R. (2020). Global desertification vulnerability to climate change and human activities. Land Degradation & Development, 31(11), 1380-1391. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3556
  11. IPCC (2014). Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2014:
  12. Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. C