Dergiler / Türk Onkoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Cochlear Sparing for Brain Tumor Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Study Comparing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Sayfa
266–273
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The choice of plan for the treatment of brain tumorsappears to base on the clinical experience, especially for patients who may experience hearing loss.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVERadiation-induced hearing loss is a common complication of radiotherapy in patients with brain tumors.This retrospective study aims to compare Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with VolumetricModulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for the patients with brain tumor concerning the sparing effecton the cochlea by comparing dosimetric parameters.METHODSIn this study, 20 patients with pathological grade IV brain tumors were selected to have planning withVMAT and IMRT for dosimetric comparison concerning organs at risk.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The dose to receive 95%(D95%) of planning target volume (PTV) and the minimum dose received 46 Gy (Dmin) were significantlylower with IMRT compared with VMAT (p=0.01 and 0.001, respectively), but the volume receiving 46Gy (V46Gy) and 60 Gy (V60Gy), and D95%, Dmean, Dmax, Dmin received 60 Gy were not different between twomethods.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The choice of plan for the treatment of brain tumorsappears to base on the clinical experience, especially for patients who may experience hearing loss.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

OBJECTIVERadiation-induced hearing loss is a common complication of radiotherapy in patients with brain tumors.This retrospective study aims to compare Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with VolumetricModulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for the patients with brain tumor concerning the sparing effecton the cochlea by comparing dosimetric parameters.METHODSIn this study, 20 patients with pathological grade IV brain tumors were selected to have planning withVMAT and IMRT for dosimetric comparison concerning organs at risk. Target coverage and dose homogeneitywere evaluated by calculating the conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) values.The treatment plans were accepted only if they met the set of planning objectives defined in the protocol.RESULTSThe homogeneity and conformity of the two plans were statistically similar. The dose to receive 95%(D95%) of planning target volume (PTV) and the minimum dose received 46 Gy (Dmin) were significantlylower with IMRT compared with VMAT (p=0.01 and 0.001, respectively), but the volume receiving 46Gy (V46Gy) and 60 Gy (V60Gy), and D95%, Dmean, Dmax, Dmin received 60 Gy were not different between twomethods. There was no significant difference in D95%, Dmean, and Dmax for total and contralateral cochleaeamong groups.CONCLUSIONSince VMAT and IMRT planning have the same effect on sparing the cochlea; no superiority can be suggestedamong these two plans during radiotherapy. The choice of plan for the treatment of brain tumorsappears to base on the clinical experience, especially for patients who may experience hearing loss.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZER, E. E., GÖÇER, G. P. S. (2022). Cochlear Sparing for Brain Tumor Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Study Comparing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 266–273. https://ajindex.com/articles/639181

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Khuntia D, Brown P, Li J, Mehta MP. Whole-brain radiotherapy in the management of brain metastasis. J Clin Oncol 2006;24(8):1295–304
  2. Diaz AZ, Choi M. Radiation-associated toxicities in the treatment of high-grade gliomas. Semin Oncol 2014;41(4):532–40
  3. Bhandare N, Antonelli PJ, Morris CG, Malayapa RS, Mendenhall WM. Ototoxicity after radiotherapy for head and neck tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;67(2):469–79
  4. Hua C, Bass JK, Khan R, Kun LE, Merchant TE. Hearing loss after radiotherapy for pediatric brain tumors: effect of cochlear dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72(3):892–9
  5. Pan CC, Eisbruch A, Lee JS, Snorrason RM, Ten Haken RK, Kileny PR. Prospective study of inner ear radiation dose and hearing loss in head-and-neck cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61(5):1393–402
  6. Cha J, Suh CO, Park K, Chang JH, Lee KS, Kim SH, et al. Feasibility and outcomes of hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy for malignant gliomas: a preliminary report. Yonsei Med J 2014;55(1):70–7
  7. Nakamatsu K, Suzuki M, Nishimura Y, Kanamori S, Koike R, Shibata T, et al. Treatment outcomes and dose-volume histogram analysis of simultaneous integrated boost method for malignant gliomas using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 2008;13(1):48–53
  8. Woods K, Lee P, Kaprealian T, Yang I, Sheng K. Cochlea-sparing acoustic neuroma treatment with 4π radiation therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018;3(2):100–7
  9. Veldeman L, Madani I, Hulstaert F, De Meerleer G, Mareel M, De Neve W. Evidence behind use of intensity- modulated radiotherapy: a systematic review of comparative clinical studies. Lancet Oncol 2008;9(4):367–75
  10. Teoh M, Clark CH, Wood K, Whitaker S, Nisbet A. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice. Br J Radiol 2011;84(1007):967–96
  11. Gao J, Qian TL, Tao CZ, Zhang YH, Zhou Y, Yang J, et al. SmartArc-based volumetric modulated arc therapy can improve the middle ear, vestibule and cochlea sparing for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with step-andshoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2015;88(1053):20150052
  12. Fippel M. Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm. Med Phys 1999;26(8):1466–75
  13. Mehta MP, Tsao MN, Whelan TJ, Morris DE, Hayman JA, Flickinger JC, et al. The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTR