Dergiler / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Characteristics of Anisometropic Patients with and without Strabismus

Sayfa
23–26
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition,depth of amblyopia was greater in anisometropic patients with strabismus.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: To evaluate the risk factors for strabismus in patients with anisometropia by comparing degree of anisometropia, depth ofamblyopia, and binocular visual function in anisometropic patients with and without strabismus.Materials and Methods: Sixty-five anisometropic patients older than 5 years with amblyopia in one eye who were followed in theAnkara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Unit between May2009 and April 2010 were included in this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:There were 27 cases of strabismus.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition,depth of amblyopia was greater in anisometropic patients with strabismus.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the risk factors for strabismus in patients with anisometropia by comparing degree of anisometropia, depth ofamblyopia, and binocular visual function in anisometropic patients with and without strabismus.Materials and Methods: Sixty-five anisometropic patients older than 5 years with amblyopia in one eye who were followed in theAnkara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Unit between May2009 and April 2010 were included in this study. There were 27 cases of strabismus. The depth of amblyopia, degree of anisometropia,and binocular visual function were assessed in anisometropic cases with and without strabismus.Results: The 65 patients with anisometropia were divided into two groups: 27 patients with strabismus (group 1) and 38 patientswithout (group 2). Depth of amblyopia was greater in patients with strabismus compared to those without (p=0.006). In patientswith strabismus, there was no correlation between angle of deviation and depth of amblyopia (p=0.453). In anisometropic amblyopiapatients without strabismus, there was a positive correlation between depth of anisometropia and depth of amblyopia (p=0.35, Pearson’scorrelation coefficient=0.343). Comparison in terms of anisometropia showed that patients with strabismus had significantly largerspherical difference between the two eyes than in patients without strabismus (p=0.000, Mann-Whitney U test). There was no significantdifference in terms of cylindrical values (p=0.146, Mann-Whitney U test). There was no statistically significant difference in the presenceof fusion between anisometropic patients with and without strabismus.Conclusion: The risk of developing strabismus increased as degree of anisometropia increased in anisometropic cases. In addition,depth of amblyopia was greater in anisometropic patients with strabismus.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATİLLA, H., ÇATAK, E., DUMAN, R. (2022). Characteristics of Anisometropic Patients with and without Strabismus. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 23–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/637781

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Chen BB, Song FW, Sun ZH, Yang Y. Anisometropia magnitude and visual deficits in previously untreated anisometropic amblyopia. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013;18;6:606-610.
  2. Levi DM, Knill DC, Bavelier D. Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review. Vision Res. 2015;114:17-30. Burian HM. Pathophysiology of exodeviations. In Manley DR, ed. Symposium on Horizontal Ocular Deviations. St Louis, Mosby; Year Book; 1971:119. Cooper J, Medow N. Major review: Intermitent Exotropia, Basic and Divergence Excess Type. Binocular Vision. 1993;8:185-216.
  3. Schlossman A, Boruchoff SA. Correlation between physiologic and clinical aspects of exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1965;40:53-64. von Noorden GK. Binoküler vision and ocular motility; Theory and management of strabismus. St. Louis; Mosby; 1996:341-354. Sapkota K. A retrospective analysis of children with anisometropic amblyopia in Nepal. Strabismus. 2014;22:47-51.
  4. Townshend AM, Holmes JM, Evans LS. Depth of anisometropic amblyopia and difference in refraction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116:431-436. Sen DK. Anisometropic amblyopia. J Pediatric Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1980;17:180-184. Helveston EM. Relationship between degree of anisometropia and depth of ambliyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;62;757-759.
  5. Öztürk F, Kurt E, Emiroğlu L. Strabismik ve anizometropik ambliyopide füzyon ve stereopsis karşılştırılması. MN Oftalmoloji. 1999;63:69-71.
  6. Çalık G, Arda KG, Suphi A. Anizometropik ambliyopi ve şaşılık ambliyopisinde füzyon ve stereopsis. Türkiye Klinikleri J Opht. 2004;13:117- 123 Tolun H, Arslan OS, Devranoğlu K ve ark, Anizometropik ambliyopide klinik özellikler. TOD XXVII Ulusal Kongre Bülteni. Yeniyol Matbaası İzmir;1994:92-98.
  7. Woodruff G, Hiscox F, Thompson JR, Smith LK. The presentation of children with amblyopia. Eye (Lond). 1994;8:623-626.
  8. Abrahamsson M, Fabian G, Sjostrand J. Refraction changes in children developing convergent or divergent strabismus. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:723-727.
  9. Otsuka J, Sato Y. Comparison of refraction in orthophoric hyperopic eyes and accommodative esotropic eyes. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;88:58-64.
  10. Aurell E, Norrsell K. A longitudinal study of children with a family history of strabismus: factors determining the incidence of strabismus. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:589-594. Phillips CI. Strabismus, anisometropia, and amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1959;43:449-460. J de Vries J. Anisometropia in children: analysis of a hospital population. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69:504-507.
  11. Kiorpes L, Wallman J. Does experimental